留学生汉语学习中网络学习资源的应用现状及影响机制研究——基于40位来华留学生的混合研究
A Study on the Application Status and Influencing Mechanism of Online Learning Resources in Chinese Language Learning for International Students—A Blended Study Based on 40 International Students in China
摘要: 随着数字技术的全面渗透,中文教育数字化转型加速推进,网络学习资源已深度融入留学生汉语学习全过程,成为弥补传统课堂教学不足、满足个性化学习需求的关键支撑。本研究采用问卷调查与半结构化访谈相结合的混合研究设计,以华东地区某综合性大学40位来华留学生为研究对象,系统考察其网络学习资源的使用行为特征、群体差异及主观认知体验。研究结果显示,网络学习资源在样本群体中渗透率达75.0%,63.3%的学习者在汉语入门阶段即开始使用,整体呈现“高频短时、碎片化嵌入”的使用特征。资源索引类与社媒交友类资源使用率最高,学习者选择资源时首要考量内容适配性与功能实用性。汉语水平、学习时长与学习阶段是影响资源使用行为的核心变量,不同背景学习者在资源类型偏好、使用深度与学习内容上存在显著分层。信息质量参差不齐、资源筛选成本过高与互动反馈机制缺失是当前制约资源使用效果的主要瓶颈。基于上述发现,本文从资源供给侧改革、教学融合应用与学习者能力培养三个维度提出系统性优化策略,为构建高质量中文教育数字资源体系提供实证依据与实践参考。
Abstract: With the full penetration of digital technologies, the digital transformation of international Chinese education is advancing rapidly. Online learning resources have been deeply embedded in the whole process of Chinese learning for international students, and have become a critical support to offset the deficiencies of traditional classroom teaching and satisfy personalized learning demands. Employing a mixed-methods design integrating questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews, this study selects 40 international students at a comprehensive university in East China as research participants, and systematically explores the behavioral characteristics, group differences and subjective cognitive experiences of their online learning resource utilization. The findings reveal that online learning resources reach a penetration rate of 75.0% among the sample, and 63.3% of learners begin to use them at the entry stage of Chinese learning, generally presenting a usage pattern of “high frequency, short duration and fragmented integration”. Resource indexing resources and social media networking resources enjoy the highest utilization rates, and learners take content adaptability and functional practicality as their primary considerations in resource selection. Chinese proficiency, learning duration and academic stage are core variables influencing resource usage behavior. Learners with different backgrounds demonstrate significant stratification in terms of resource type preference, usage depth and learning content. Uneven information quality, excessive resource screening costs and the absence of interactive feedback mechanisms are currently the major bottlenecks restricting the effectiveness of resource utilization. On the basis of the above findings, this paper puts forward systematic optimization strategies from three dimensions, namely resource supply-side reform, integrated teaching application and learner competence cultivation, so as to provide empirical evidence and practical reference for building a high-quality digital resource system for international Chinese education.
文章引用:Shakirova Liia, 翟涛. 留学生汉语学习中网络学习资源的应用现状及影响机制研究——基于40位来华留学生的混合研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(9): 837-851. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.149750

参考文献

[1] 马箭飞, 梁宇, 吴应辉, 等. 国际中文教育教学资源建设70年: 成就与展望[J]. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2021(6): 15-22.
[2] 刘琉. 数字化转型赋能国际中文教育高质量发展[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2025(50): 49-52.
[3] 郭晶, 刘新阳. 越南网上中文数字教学资源现状、影响因素和开发策略[J]. 昆明学院学报, 2025, 47(1): 82-91.
[4] 马宁. 国际中文数字化教学资源的应用成效比较刍议[J]. 办公自动化, 2023, 28(5): 29-32, 25.
[5] 丁琳. AI驱动下高校国际留学生汉语听说能力提升策略[J]. 郑州师范教育, 2025, 14(6): 79-81.
[6] 黄玉洁. 人工智能支持下汉语国际教育的个性化学习创新路径探究[J]. 大学, 2025(32): 11-14.
[7] 张寒冰, 王颜. 国际中文教育“线上 + 本土线下”教学模式探索——以越南学习者为例[J]. 广西教育学院学报, 2026, 46(1): 85-93.
[8] 孟润田. 国际学生线上共建课堂汉语教学互动模式探索[J]. 大理大学学报, 2026, 11(3): 115-121.
[9] 徐上. 基于建构主义学习理论的现代汉语课程智慧教学探索[J]. 汉字文化, 2026(2): 110-112.
[10] 李澎钥. 学习共同体视角下国际中文教育教学研究——以留学生汉语口语训练课程为例[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2025, 39(6): 88-91.
[11] 苏晓敏, 黄文静, 刘静雯, 等. 佛统皇家大学泰国学生的汉语学习App文化体验维度研究[J]. 文化创新比较研究, 2026, 10(7): 32-35.
[12] 李清园, 刘建国. 基于学习者视角的《工业汉语》数字化资源文化传播优化路径[J]. 哈尔滨职业技术学院学报, 2025(6): 26-28.
[13] 李琦, 史金生. 产出导向法对留学生汉语学习焦虑影响的个案研究[J]. 外语教育研究前沿, 2025, 8(5): 24-36.
[14] 田晓蕾, 戴一鸾. 跨文化视角下国外汉语学习者中国文化习得特征研究[J]. 西安外国语大学学报, 2025, 33(4): 30-35.
[15] 杜芳, 侯晓霞. 论国际中文教育数字文化资源的应用策略[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025(2): 154-159.
[16] Lantolf, J.P. (1994) Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 418-420.
[17] Yakar, U., Soylu, A. and Çaliş, N. (2020) From Constructivist Educational Technology to Mobile Constructivism: How Mobile Learning Serves Constructivism? International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 6, 56-75.
[18] Krashen, S.D. (1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Longman.
[19] Swain, M. (1985) Communicative Competence: Some Roles of Comprehensible Input and Comprehensible Output in Its Development. In: Gass, S. and Madden, C., Eds., Input in Second Language Acquisition, Newbury House, 235-253.