川渝地区泥页岩层段解卡用酸液配方的应用进展
Advances in Acid Formulation Applications for Drillstring Unsticking in Sichuan-Chongqing Shale Reservoirs
摘要: 川渝龙马溪组泥页岩水平井因高硅质(SiO
2 58%~83%)、强脆性、层理与微裂隙发育及长水平段钻进,导致黏附卡钻与坍塌掉块卡钻频发,事故占比15%~20%,时效损失严重。环空间隙狭小的旋转导向工具更易发生“秒杀式”卡死,常规机械震击与“寸提”法成功率低,失败后常致侧钻或井眼报废,且高温缓蚀失效易引发钻具酸蚀断裂等次生风险。现场表明,卡钻呈“压差黏附–剥落坍塌–固相填埋”多机制叠加,单一物理或常规盐酸处理难以高效解卡。酸液解卡技术通过溶蚀泥饼与掉块、降低摩阻恢复管柱活动性,已从常规盐酸体系演进为集“靶向溶蚀–井壁稳定–钻具防护”于一体的协同定制化技术。当前应用以土酸–有机弱酸复合体系与乳化/泡沫酸缓速酸并重,微乳酸等新型缓释体系在复杂工况下潜力突出,泡酸与物理解卡协同工艺日趋成熟。但仍面临高硅硬脆性页岩靶向溶蚀机理不明、120℃以上高温缓蚀长效性衰减、解卡效率与井壁稳定平衡调控困难、区块差异化定制化配方缺失等瓶颈。未来需发展分子设计型功能酸液、智能缓控释体系及“解卡–防塌–缓蚀”一体化集成技术,以突破现有难题,提升川渝复杂地层解卡效率与安全性。
Abstract: Horizontal drilling in Sichuan-Chongqing Longmaxi shale formations (SiO₂ 58%~83%) faces high risks of differential sticking and caving/sloughing accidents (15%~20% of drilling incidents) due to strong brittleness, developed bedding/microfractures, long laterals, and narrow-clearance rotary steerable systems (RSS), often causing severe time losses. Conventional methods (mechanical jarring, incremental lifting) exhibit low efficacy, while high-temperature corrosion inhibitor failures can lead to secondary risks like acid-induced drillstring fractures. Field observations reveal multi-mechanism sticking (differential pressure adhesion + spalling/collapse + solid embedment), rendering traditional HCl treatments ineffective. Recent advances in acid unsticking technology focus on synergistic systems integrating targeted dissolution, wellbore stabilization, and drillstring protection. Key approaches include mud acid-organic acid composites, retarded acids (emulsified/foam acids), and microemulsions for complex conditions, coupled with acid soaking + mechanical unsticking protocols. However, challenges persist: unclear dissolution mechanisms in high-silica shale, limited corrosion inhibitor longevity above 120˚C, balancing unsticking efficiency vs. wellbore integrity, and lack of block-specific formulations. Future research should prioritize molecular-designed acid fluids, intelligent controlled-release systems, and integrated unsticking-anticollapse-corrosion inhibition technologies to enhance efficiency and safety in these formations.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
黎红胜, 温慧芸, 郑振国, 等. 泡酸解卡技术在哥伦比亚G-10ST5井卡钻事故中的应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2022, 42(21): 155-158.
|
|
[2]
|
李榕, 陈宇, 陈振良. 四川海相地层白油基钻井液泡酸解卡技术研究[J]. 石油工业技术监督, 2025, 41(12): 46-50.
|
|
[3]
|
范玉光, 杨恒林, 付利, 等. 川渝地区水平井卡钻类型与防治措施研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2020, 32(3): 87-90+93.
|
|
[4]
|
胡亚男. 超高温碳酸盐岩酸化环境友好型螯合剂体系性能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2024.
|
|
[5]
|
栾晓伟. 复合酸液体系在定向小井眼酸化解卡中的应用[J]. 石化技术, 2026, 33(5): 132-133+113.
|
|
[6]
|
乔东宇, 陈若铭, 郑义平, 等. 高效解卡剂的研究与应用[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2013, 30(6): 24-26+92-93.
|
|
[7]
|
曹华庆, 燕建成, 吴名睿. 页岩油气井旋转导向工具卡钻机理及防卡解卡工艺[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2025, 18(4): 404-411+450.
|
|
[8]
|
陈洁. 川渝典型地区泥页岩地球化学特征及页岩气资源潜力研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012.
|
|
[9]
|
邓鑫, 康志宏, 陈阳阳, 等. 川渝鄂地区龙马溪组页岩沉积环境及储集特征[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2018, 42(2): 80-87+116+121-122.
|
|
[10]
|
戴建全. 裂缝性碳酸盐岩地层解卡酸液体系研究与应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2010, 32(S1): 146-148.
|
|
[11]
|
沈文敏. 泡沫酸酸化技术在曙光油田的应用[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2015, 16(3): 12-14.
|