贸易政策不确定性对中国自动数据处理设备出口的影响研究——基于双重差分法的实证分析
The Impact of Trade Policy Uncertainty on China’s Exports of Automatic Data Processing Equipment—An Empirical Analysis Based on the Difference-in-Differences Method
摘要: 在全球产业链重构的背景下,本文以2015~2025年月度数据为样本,采用双重差分法(DID)系统考察美国贸易政策不确定性(TPU)对中国自动数据处理设备(ADP)出口的冲击。研究创新性地聚焦ADP细分产品,构建“预期调整–冲击兑现”两阶段分析框架,并选取德、日作为对照组有效分离政策特异性效应。研究发现:第一,美国TPU显著抑制中国对美ADP出口,降幅达59.52%,该结论经多重稳健性检验依然可靠;第二,政策冲击呈非线性动态特征,市场在预期调整期已出现7.67%的提前下降,冲击兑现期降幅进一步扩大,证实了显著的前瞻性预期效应;第三,TPU冲击主要引发出口市场转移而非总量收缩。本文为理解TPU对高科技产品贸易的传导机制提供了新视角,对优化出口结构、完善风险预警机制具有重要政策启示。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of global supply chain restructuring, this paper utilizes monthly data from 2015 to 2025 and employs the Difference-in-Differences (DID) method to systematically investigate the impact of U.S. trade policy uncertainty (TPU) on China’s exports of automatic data processing (ADP) equipment. Innovatively focusing on disaggregated ADP products, this study constructs a two-stage analytical framework comprising “expectation adjustment” and “shock realization,” and selects Germany and Japan as a control group to effectively isolate policy-specific effects. The findings reveal that: First, U.S. TPU significantly reduces China’s ADP exports to the U.S. by 59.52%, a conclusion that remains robust across multiple robustness checks. Second, the policy shock exhibits non-linear dynamic characteristics. The market experienced a pre-emptive decline of 7.67% during the expectation adjustment stage, and the decline further deepened during the shock realization stage, confirming a significant forward-looking expectation effect. Third, the TPU shock primarily triggers export market diversion rather than an aggregate contraction in export volume. This paper provides a novel perspective for understanding the transmission mechanism of TPU on high-tech product trade, offering important policy implications for optimizing export structures and enhancing risk early-warning mechanisms.
文章引用:吴豪, 吴欣遥, 徐瑞, 汪湘泽, 汪友林. 贸易政策不确定性对中国自动数据处理设备出口的影响研究——基于双重差分法的实证分析[J]. 商业全球化, 2026, 14(4): 241-254. https://doi.org/10.12677/bglo.2026.144025

参考文献

[1] 赵逖. 贸易政策不确定性与高技术产业出口竞争力——理论机制与实证检验[J]. 现代管理科学, 2023(5): 31-39.
[2] 陈玉, 林董林, 张燕. 关税威胁下的“抢进口”效应——基于中美贸易摩擦的自然实验[J]. 国际商务研究, 2026, 47(3): 13-26.
[3] Baker, S.R., Bloom, N. and Davis, S.J. (2016) Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 1593-1636.
https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
[4] Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M., Molligo, P., Prestipino, A. and Raffo, A. (2020) The Economic Effects of Trade Policy Uncertainty. Journal of Monetary Economics, 109, 38-59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.11.002
[5] 余东升, 李小平, 余娟娟. 贸易政策不确定性与新质生产力——基于企业绿色全要素生产率视角[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2025, 45(9): 2859-2881.
[6] 李敬子, 刘月. 贸易政策不确定性与研发投资: 来自中国企业的经验证据[J]. 产业经济研究, 2019(6): 1-13.
[7] 赵君丽, 张雨欣. 贸易政策不确定性对出口韧性的影响研究[J]. 商业经济, 2025(6): 78-81+140.
[8] 黑爱娟. 国际贸易政策变化对企业出口行为的影响研究[J]. 中国商论, 2026, 35(8): 165-168.
[9] 许锐翔, 许祥云, 施宇. 经济政策不确定性与全球贸易低速增长——基于引力模型的分析[J]. 财经研究, 2018, 44(7): 60-72.
[10] 刘晨阳, 赵子宜. 贸易政策不确定性感知与企业供应链非对称性配置: 集中化和多元化视角[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2026, 28(1): 51-65+112.
[11] 梁桐. 贸易政策不确定性扰乱全球价值链[N]. 经济日报, 2025-09-06(004).
[12] 丁浩员, 董文娟, 余心玎. 贸易政策冲击下的跨国供应链断裂与重构研究[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(8): 95-113.
[13] 余淼杰, 肖泽文, 钟雪. 美国“友岸外包”: 测算、成因与对策[J]. 长安大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(5): 40-60.
[14] 杨子晖, 周学伟, 戴志颖. 贸易政策不确定性、供应链暴露网络与全球违约风险——来自异质性空间自回归模型的新证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2026(4): 5-27.
[15] 田雅洁, 季捷, 汪寿阳, 等. 特朗普再执政对中国出口的影响: 基于合成控制法的动态分析[J]. 计量经济学报, 2025, 5(1): 197-217.