牧区旅游发展中的人口流动与复合生计——以内蒙古自治区四子王旗脑木更苏木为例
Population Mobility and Composite Livelihoods in the Development of Pastoral Tourism—A Case Study of Naomugeng Sumu, Siziwang Banner, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
DOI: 10.12677/cnc.2026.145170, PDF,   
作者: 包桃林:内蒙古师范大学民族学人类学学院,内蒙古 呼和浩特
关键词: 牧区旅游;人口进入;复合生计;地方嵌入;Pastoral Tourism; Population Access; Composite Livelihood; Local Embeddedness
摘要: 牧区旅游发展不仅带来游客流动,也改变了地方人口进入与家庭生计安排。以内蒙古自治区四子王旗脑木更苏木为个案,本文基于实地访谈资料,考察牧区旅游发展如何创造经营与服务机会。研究发现,旅游发展通过景观开发、线路整合和服务需求扩展,使原本以牧业生产为主的地方空间逐渐具备接待、经营和服务功能;人口进入之后,当地家庭并未由牧业直接转向旅游业,而是在原有牧业基础上叠加旅游接待和配套服务,形成“旅游 + 牧业”的复合生计方式。牧区旅游发展的社会意义,不仅在于促进增收,更在于重新塑造地方人口进入条件和家庭生计组合方式。
Abstract: The development of pastoral tourism not only drives the flow of tourists, but also reshapes the access conditions for local populations and the livelihood arrangement of local households. Taking Naomugeng Sumu in Siziwang Banner of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region as a case study, this paper investigates how the development of pastoral tourism creates business and service opportunities based on field interview data. The research finds that through landscape development, route integration and the expansion of service demand, tourism development endows the local space, which was originally dominated by pastoral production, with functions of reception, operation and service gradually; after the entry of population, local households have not directly shifted from pastoral industry to tourism, but superimposed tourism reception and supporting services on the basis of original pastoral production, forming a composite livelihood mode of “tourism + pastoral industry”. The social significance of pastoral tourism development lies not only in promoting income growth, but also in reshaping the access conditions for local populations and the combination mode of household livelihoods.
文章引用:包桃林. 牧区旅游发展中的人口流动与复合生计——以内蒙古自治区四子王旗脑木更苏木为例[J]. 国学, 2026, 14(5): 1212-1218. https://doi.org/10.12677/cnc.2026.145170

参考文献

[1] 杨德进, 冯雪, 刘丽娟, 等. 新内源式视角下民族地区旅游驱动乡村振兴的路径研究[J]. 旅游研究, 2026, 18(1): 31-43.
[2] 郭景福, 药劲松. 乡村振兴视阈下呼伦贝尔草原旅游业发展[J]. 民族学刊, 2022, 13(6): 37-45+142.
[3] 徐黎丽, 乌日丽格. 边境口岸区域牧民非牧化探析——以新巴尔虎左旗巴音塔拉嘎查为例[J]. 贵州民族研究, 2022, 43(3): 120-127.
[4] 范明明. 牧民分化、牧业生产与传统牧区乡村振兴——内蒙古锡林郭勒盟个案考察[J]. 北方民族大学学报, 2023(5): 97-105.
[5] 龙贺兴, 隋颖. 城镇化进程中边境地区牧民流动定居模式与影响研究——基于内蒙古自治区锡林郭勒盟东乌珠穆沁旗的调研[J]. 南宁师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 45(3): 115-129.
[6] 顾辉. 去还是留?——回乡民工继续外出就业的影响因素分析[J]. 当代青年研究, 2012(1): 33-38.
[7] 孙艺璇. 谁是“闯荡的料”: 高学历小城青年择业决策的文化逻辑——基于对E市40位青年的深度访谈[J]. 当代青年研究, 2025(6): 1-19.
[8] 刘畅. “回县青年”县域体制内就业及其成因[J]. 青年研究, 2024(1): 67-78.
[9] 王惠, 韦陆星, 吴惠芳. 生存为大: 大学生猪倌何以可能? [J]. 当代青年研究, 2025(5): 68-82.
[10] 梁伟, 陈锋. 青年职业农民的乡土嵌入机制与村庄再造——基于D镇返乡创业大学生的案例研究[J]. 中国青年研究, 2022(5): 111-118+110.
[11] 万书润民. 返乡小镇青年社会化的“脱栓”困境及其生成路径[J]. 理论月刊, 2025(1): 106-116.
[12] 闵兢, 黄慧. 返乡青年治村的实践逻辑与空间再生产[J]. 中国青年研究, 2024(8): 50-59.
[13] 储德平, 谢芳, 阙小乙. 跨地方性视角下乡村旅游地治理共同体的生成过程与机制——以陕西省袁家村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2026, 45(8): 2422-2441.
[14] Merton, R.K. (1959) Social Conformity, Deviation, and Opportunity Structures: A Comment on the Contributions of Dubin and Cloward. American Sociological Review, 24, 177-189.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2089428
[15] Bernard, J., Steinführer, A., Klärner, A. and Keim-Klärner, S. (2023) Regional Opportunity Structures: A Research Agenda to Link Spatial and Social Inequalities in Rural Areas. Progress in Human Geography, 47, 103-123.
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221139980