黑格尔《法哲学原理》对现代个体自由原则的处理
Hegel’s Treatment of the Modern Principle of Individual Freedom in Philosophy of Right
摘要: 现代个体自由既要求主体拥有免受外在强制的独立领域,也要求主体能够通过自我规定实现自身目的。黑格尔《法哲学原理》虽未以这一表述讨论自由,却对上述两项要求进行了系统处理。就前者而言,黑格尔通过人格权、财产权及法律司法制度,使个体自由获得了保障;就后者而言,黑格尔通过道德中的主体性与自我规定,进一步推动自由在家庭、市民社会和国家中完成自我规定,实现自身目的。然而,当共同体被理解为个体自由的现实条件时,如何防止公共权力以普遍性为由忽视个体,成为《法哲学原理》有待解决的内在张力。
Abstract: Modern individual freedom requires both an independent sphere protected from external coercion and the capacity of the subject to realize its own ends through self-determination. Although Hegel does not formulate freedom in these terms in Philosophy of Right, he systematically addresses both requirements. With regard to the former, Hegel safeguards individual freedom through personality rights, property rights, and the institutions of law and the administration of justice. With regard to the latter, through subjectivity and self-determination in morality, he further develops an account of how freedom realizes its own ends through self-determination in the family, civil society, and the state. However, once the community is understood as the condition for the actualization of individual freedom, the question of how to prevent public power from disregarding the individual in the name of universality becomes an unresolved internal tension in Philosophy of Right.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陈浩. 论共同体包容个体自由之限度——以黑格尔的“主观自由”概念为例[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 30(4): 108-118.
|
|
[2]
|
姚大志. 什么的自由? [J]. 哲学研究, 2018(10): 100-108.
|
|
[3]
|
洛克. 政府论下篇[M]. 叶启芳, 瞿菊农, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1996.
|
|
[4]
|
密尔. 论自由[M]. 程崇华, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1969: 10.
|
|
[5]
|
霍耐特. 自由的权利[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2012.
|
|
[6]
|
斯宾诺莎. 伦理学[M]. 贺麟, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2014.
|
|
[7]
|
伍德. 黑格尔的伦理思想[M]. 黄涛, 译. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2016.
|
|
[8]
|
黑格尔. 法哲学原理[M]. 范扬, 张企泰, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2021.
|
|
[9]
|
诺尔斯. 黑格尔与《法哲学原理》[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 2025.
|
|
[10]
|
康德. 康德著作全集第4卷[M]. 李秋零, 主编. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2005.
|
|
[11]
|
阿多诺. 否定辩证法[M]. 王凤才, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2019.
|
|
[12]
|
诺伊豪瑟. 黑格尔社会理论的基础: 积极自由[M]. 张寅, 译. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2020.
|