现象学视域下的海德格尔美学——艺术作品中的真理显现与主客二分的超越
Heidegger’s Aesthetics from a Phenomenological Perspective —The Manifestation of Truth in the Work of Art and the Transcendence of the Subject-Object Dichotomy
摘要: 本文旨在通过现象学方法探讨海德格尔的美学思想,核心聚焦于其著作《艺术作品的本源》。文章论述了艺术作品如何作为“真理发生”的场域,从而超越传统哲学中主客二分的思维模式。通过与柏拉图的模仿论美学进行对比,文章突出了海德格尔思想的独特性及其在艺术与真理关系上的革新。本文亦梳理了围绕梵高《农鞋》的学术争论,指出海德格尔阐释农鞋画的关键不在于鞋的归属认定,而在于艺术作品让真理发生的本体论价值。最后,论文探讨了海德格尔美学对当代艺术、技术批判的启示,并对未来的研究方向进行了展望。文章的核心论点是:在海德格尔看来,艺术的本质并非模仿或主观表达,而是存在之真理的自行显现与解蔽(aletheia)。
Abstract: This paper aims to explore Heidegger’s aesthetic thought through a phenomenological approach, focusing primarily on his work The Origin of the Work of Art. It discusses how the artwork serves as a site for the “happening of truth,” thereby transcending the subject-object dichotomy characteristic of traditional philosophical thinking. By contrasting Heidegger’s views with Plato’s aesthetic theory of mimesis, the paper highlights the uniqueness of Heidegger’s thought and his innovative perspective on the relationship between art and truth. The paper also reviews the scholarly debates surrounding Van Gogh’s A Pair of Shoes, arguing that the significance of Heidegger’s interpretation lies not in identifying the shoes’ owner, but in the ontological value of the artwork as a locus where truth occurs. Finally, the paper examines the implications of Heidegger’s aesthetics for contemporary art and the critique of technology, while offering an outlook on future research directions. The central argument is that, for Heidegger, the essence of art lies neither in mimesis nor in subjective expression, but in the self-manifestation and unconcealment (aletheia) of the truth of Being.
文章引用:邢赞. 现象学视域下的海德格尔美学——艺术作品中的真理显现与主客二分的超越[J]. 哲学进展, 2026, 15(10): 69-75. https://doi.org/10.12677/acpp.2026.1510460

参考文献

[1] 海德格尔. 艺术作品的本源[M]. 孙周兴, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2022.
[2] 倪梁康. 现象学美学的起步——胡塞尔与盖格尔的思想关联[J]. 同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 28(3): 1-15.
[3] 海德格尔. 存在与时间[M]. 陈嘉映, 王庆节, 译. 熊伟, 校. 陈嘉映, 修订. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
[4] 杨春时. 审美的现象性与建立审美现象学之可能[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 39(4): 40-46.
[5] 张云鹏. 从艺术作品感性结构的“生发-显现”看海德格尔的“凡·高阐释” [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2018, 38(1): 177-183.
[6] 席铭状. 海德格尔艺术真理观重探——从凡高的《农鞋》说起[J]. 宜宾学院学报, 2018, 18(1): 99-106.
[7] 张世英. 艺术哲学的新方向[J]. 文艺研究, 1999(4): 70-77.
[8] 张世英. 超越在场的东西——兼论想象[J]. 江海学刊, 1996(4): 69-74.
[9] Schapiro, M. (1994) The Still Life as a Personal Object—A Note on Heidegger and van Gogh, Further Notes on Heidegger and van Gogh. In: Schapiro, M., Ed., Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society, George Braziller, 135-142.
[10] Wrathall, M.A. (2025) Heidegger and van Gogh’s Shoes. Word & Image, 41, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.2024.2412352
[11] 海德格尔. 林中路[M]. 孙周兴, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2018.