高外水压力现场测试技术研究现状综述
A Review of Current Research on Field Testing Technologies for High External Water Pressure
摘要: 高外水压力是深埋水工隧洞、海底隧道及富水山岭隧道设计和施工中的关键控制因素,其现场测试结果直接影响衬砌水荷载取值、排水系统设计、注浆圈参数优化以及突涌水风险评估。近十年研究表明,外水压力现场测试已由单点水压观测逐步发展为孔内分层监测、洞内衬砌背后水压监测、光纤传感、水力层析反演、排水系统性能监测和数值反馈分析相结合的综合技术体系。本文在梳理近十年国内外文献的基础上,归纳高外水压力测试对象、测试方法、传感装备、模型试验与工程应用的研究进展,比较不同技术的适用条件和局限性,并讨论复杂地质体表征、多场耦合监测、传感器长期可靠性和监测数据深度利用等共性问题。综述认为,未来高外水压力现场测试将向多源感知、三维反演、实时反馈和智能预警方向发展,其核心不再是单纯获得水压力数值,而是构建能够服务于设计校核、施工调整和运营安全管理的全过程测试–分析闭环。
Abstract: High external water pressure is a key controlling factor in the design and construction of deep-buried hydraulic tunnels, subsea tunnels, and water-rich mountain tunnels. Its field test results directly affect the determination of lining water loads, drainage system design, optimization of grouting ring parameters, and water-inrush risk assessment. Studies over the past decade show that field testing of external water pressure has gradually evolved from single-point water pressure observation into an integrated technical system combining multi-level borehole monitoring, measurement of water pressure behind the tunnel lining, fiber-optic sensing, hydraulic tomography inversion, drainage system performance monitoring, and numerical feedback analysis. Based on a review of domestic and international literature over the past decade, this paper summarizes research progress in testing objects, testing methods, sensing equipment, model tests, and engineering applications for high external water pressure, compares the applicability and limitations of different technologies, and discusses common issues such as the characterization of complex geological bodies, multi-field coupling monitoring, long-term sensor reliability, and in-depth utilization of monitoring data. This review concludes that future field testing of high external water pressure will develop toward multi-source sensing, three-dimensional inversion, real-time feedback, and intelligent early warning. Its core objective is no longer merely to obtain water pressure values, but to establish a full-process testing-analysis closed loop that can serve design verification, construction adjustment, and operational safety management.
文章引用:刘云谦. 高外水压力现场测试技术研究现状综述[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(10): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.1510232

参考文献

[1] 黄威, 孙云, 张建平, 等. 深埋隧洞高外水压力研究进展[J]. 三峡大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(5): 1-11.
[2] 刘立鹏, 汪小刚, 段庆伟, 付睿智, 姜龙. 高压富水地层水工隧洞衬砌外水压力确定与应对措施[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(8): 1549-1557.
[3] 张振杰. 高外水压作用下大埋深隧洞围岩稳定分析方法及工程应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(11): 2858-2872.
[4] 张志恩. 高压富水隧道衬砌外水压力折减规律及施工缝抗水压能力研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2023.
[5] 王志杰, 雷飞亚, 侯伟名, 等. 富水大断面公路隧道水压模型试验及衬砌结构力学行为研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(8): 108-118.
[6] He, B.G., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z.Q., Feng, X.T. and Sun, Z.J. (2021) Model Test on the Behavior of Tunnel Linings under Earth Pressure Conditions and External Water Pressure. Transportation Geotechnics, 26, Article 100457.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100457
[7] Duan, S.Q., Jiang, X.Q., Jiang, Q., et al. (2023) Theoretical Solution and Failure Analysis of Water Pressure on Lining of Deep-Buried Non-Circular Hydraulic Tunnel Based on the Equivalent Hydraulic Radius Method. Engineering Failure Analysis, 148, Article 107163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107163
[8] 杨跃辉, 孙东生, 秦向辉, 等. 基于测试系统柔度分析的水压致裂法确定最大水平主应力误差分析与讨论[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(S1): 3385-3396.
[9] Bao, T., Zhang, S., Liu, C. and Xu, Q. (2022) Experimental Study on the Effect of Hydraulic Deterioration of Different Drainage Systems on Lining Water Pressure. Processes, 10, Article 1975.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10101975
[10] 陈军涛, 喻军健, 李果, 等. 含不同裂隙数量砂岩注浆前后力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2025, 44(7): 1767-1781.
[11] 刘学伟, 刘云豪, 刘滨, 等. 注浆裂隙岩体力学特性影响因素试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2025, 44(7): 1782-1799.
[12] 洪博诚, 吴崇健, 于淼, 常天英, 姜海明, 崔洪亮. 推挽式高灵敏光纤光栅水压传感器研究[J]. 光学精密工程, 2025, 33(14): 2178-2187.
[13] Zhang, X.H., Zhu, H.H., Jiang, X. and Broere, W. (2024) Distributed Fiber Optic Sensors for Tunnel Monitoring: A State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 16, 3841-3863.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.01.008
[14] Xu, S.Y., Li, X.Z., Wang, T.Y., et al. (2023) Fiber Bragg Grating Pressure Sensors: A Review. Optical Engineering, 62, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.62.1.010902
[15] Paradis, D., Lefebvre, R. and Nefzi, A. (2024) Parameter Resolution of Simulated Responses to Periodic Hydraulic Tomography Signals in Aquifers. Advances in Water Resources, 190, Article 104734.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104734
[16] Nefzi, A., Paradis, D., Lefebvre, R., Bour, O. and Lavenant, N. (2025) Field Deployment and Analysis of Hydraulic Tomography Experiments with Periodic Slug Tests in an Anisotropic Littoral Aquifer. Journal of Hydrology, 653, Article 132747.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132747
[17] Xue, T.E., Zhang, Q.Y., Zhang, Z.J., et al. (2024) Geo-Mechanical Model Test on Excavation and Support of Deep Tunnel Crossing a Fault under Hydro-Mechanical Coupled Condition. Acta Geotechnica, 19, 2063-2082.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-023-02001-4
[18] Wang, P.F., Zhang, Q.Y., Duan, K. and Lin, H.X. (2025) Geo-Mechanical Model Test on Synergistic Seepage Control in a Deeply Buried Water Diversion Tunnel under Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Conditions. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 159, Article 106516.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2025.106516
[19] 周文朋. 富水地层隧道防渗施工技术[J]. 城市建筑与发展, 2024, 5(23): 181-183.
[20] 张博, 刘夕奇. 高水压条件下水利隧洞注浆堵水施工工艺优化[J]. 水利电力技术与应用, 2026, 8(6): 55-57.
[21] 覃自龙. 隧道工程地质风险识别与超前预报技术研究[J]. 工程建设, 2026, 9(5): 74-77.
[22] 杨润飞, 李梅洁, 杨泽许. 长距离引水隧洞TBM掘进施工风险识别与应对策略[J]. 现代工程项目管理, 2026, 5(8): 49-51.
[23] 周文豪. 公路隧道防水排水系统常见问题及治理方案[J]. 现代交通与路桥建设, 2026, 5(3): 49-51.
[24] 于照宸. 浅谈特长隧道反坡排水施工技术[J]. 工程技术与质量管理, 2026, 2(7): 202-204.
[25] 白丛林. 适用于深埋隧道的TBM机载超长距离超前钻探技术集成与工程应用研究[J]. 机械与电子控制工程, 2026, 8(9): 82-84.