政策周期视角下三孩政策的舆情演化研究
A Study on the Evolution of Public Opinion on the Three-Child Policy from the Perspective of the Policy Cycle
DOI: 10.12677/jc.2026.1410259, PDF,   
作者: 冯 晴:西北工业大学公共政策与管理学院,陕西 西安
关键词: 三孩政策;政策周期;网络舆情;情感分析;生育支持;Three-Child Policy; Policy Cycle; Online Public Opinion; Sentiment Analysis; Fertility Support
摘要: 为探究三孩政策不同政策周期中公众网络舆情的演化特征,文章以2020~2025年新浪微博主流媒体相关博文评论为研究对象,依据政策周期理论划分议程设置、政策实施初期和政策调整与评估三个阶段,运用网络爬虫技术和自然语言处理(NLP)情感分析技术对4224条有效评论进行情感分析,并对舆情内容进行阶段性比较。结果显示:公众情感总体呈现由消极情绪主导到中性情绪与消极情绪并存再到中性主导的阶段性特征。网络舆情的阶段性变化与政策信息逐步明确、公众关注重点转变以及生育相关现实约束持续存在等因素密切相关。基于此,建议应以公众需求为导向优化政策工具组合,完善生育支持和公共服务体系,降低家庭与企业相关成本,提升政策执行效能,营造更加友好的生育环境。
Abstract: To investigate the evolutionary characteristics of online public opinion across different policy cycles of the three-child policy, this study examines comments on relevant posts published by mainstream media on Sina Weibo from 2020 to 2025. Drawing on policy cycle theory, the study divides the policy process into three stages: agenda setting, the early stage of policy implementation, and policy adjustment and evaluation. Using web crawling techniques and natural language processing (NLP)-based sentiment analysis, 4224 valid comments were collected and analyzed to identify the emotional characteristics of public opinion and compare the content of online public opinion across different stages. The results show that public sentiment exhibits distinct stage-specific patterns, shifting from predominantly negative emotions to a coexistence of neutral and negative emotions, and ultimately to a predominantly neutral emotional orientation. The stage-based changes in online public opinion are closely associated with the gradual clarification of policy information, shifts in public attention, and the persistence of real-world constraints related to fertility. Based on these findings, policymakers should optimize the combination of policy instruments with public needs as the guiding principle, improve the fertility support and public service systems, reduce the costs associated with childbearing for households and enterprises, and enhance the effectiveness of policy implementation. These measures can help foster a more supportive and family-friendly environment for childbearing.
文章引用:冯晴. 政策周期视角下三孩政策的舆情演化研究[J]. 新闻传播科学, 2026, 14(10): 47-54. https://doi.org/10.12677/jc.2026.1410259

参考文献

[1] 陈友华, 孙永健. “三孩”生育新政: 缘起、预期效果与政策建议[J]. 人口与社会, 2021, 37(3): 1-12.
[2] 张翼. “三孩生育”政策与未来生育率变化趋势[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2021(4): 30-36.
[3] 聂建亮, 董子越. “三孩”政策: 积极影响、多重障碍与因应策略[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(6): 77-84.
[4] 夏婧, 刘莉. 如何创造生育福利?——国际比较视域下“三孩”政策推进及配套措施构建[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(6): 85-94.
[5] 崔凯. 政策传播中的议程主导者: 主流媒体对自媒体的跨阶段议程设置——以三孩政策传播为例[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2025, 32(3): 54-72, 127.
[6] 孟凡思, 钟寒, 施水才, 等. 基于SVM和CRF的三孩政策舆情省份差异分析[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(10): 142-150.
[7] 陈娟, 孙琪. 惠民公共政策出台缘何遭“冷遇”?——基于新浪微博平台三孩政策转发评论的数据分析[J]. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 50(5): 70-75.
[8] 李丹, 李丽萍, 李丹. 三孩政策出台的舆情效应及启示——基于NLP的网络大数据分析[J]. 中国青年研究, 2021(10): 46-53.
[9] 陈振明. 政策科学——公共政策分析导论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2003.