企业ESG表现对其债务融资成本的影响研究
The Effect of Corporate ESG Performance on the Cost of Debt Financing
DOI: 10.12677/bglo.2026.144028, PDF,   
作者: 范瑞丽:江西财经大学会计学院,江西 南昌
关键词: ESG;债务融资成本;融资约束;ESG; Cost of Debt Financing; Financing Constraints
摘要: 本文研究了企业环境、社会和治理(ESG)表现对债务融资成本的影响。研究基于2009~2024年中国A股上市公司的面板数据,采用实证分析方法检验了两者之间的关系。研究主要得出三个结论:(1) 企业ESG表现的提升能显著降低其债务融资成本,该结论在经过一系列稳健性与内生性检验后依然成立。(2) ESG表现通过缓解企业的融资约束,进而降低了债务融资成本,即融资约束在其中扮演了中介角色。(3) ESG表现对债务融资成本的降低作用在2018年《上市公司治理准则》修订后以及在制造业企业中更为显著。最后,文章基于研究结果为企业、债权人和政府部门提供了相应的政策建议。
Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance on debt financing costs. Based on panel data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2024, this study employs empirical analysis to examine the relationship between the two. The main findings are as follows: (1) Improvements in corporate ESG performance significantly reduce debt financing costs, and this conclusion remains robust after a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. (2) ESG performance reduces debt financing costs by alleviating corporate financing constraints, with financing constraints playing a mediating role. (3) The cost-reducing effect of ESG performance on debt financing is more pronounced after the 2018 revision of the Code of Corporate Governance for Listed Companies and among manufacturing firms. Finally, based on the research findings, this paper provides corresponding policy recommendations for firms, creditors, and government authorities.
文章引用:范瑞丽. 企业ESG表现对其债务融资成本的影响研究[J]. 商业全球化, 2026, 14(4): 282-295. https://doi.org/10.12677/bglo.2026.144028

参考文献

[1] Landi, G. and Sciarelli, M. (2019) Towards a More Ethical Market: The Impact of ESG Rating on Corporate Financial Performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15, 11-27.
https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-11-2017-0254
[2] DasGupta, R. (2022) Financial Performance Shortfall, ESG Controversies, and ESG Performance: Evidence from Firms around the World. Finance Research Letters, 46, Article ID: 102487.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487
[3] 陶小龙, 陈杨, 李丹, 等. ESG表现、绿色技术创新与企业绩效关系[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2025, 42(15): 87-97.
[4] 王艳, 王宇齐. ESG评分对A股上市公司股票价格相对于上证指数走势的影响[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2025, 41(2): 96-108.
[5] 张曾莲, 冯勇杰. 企业提高ESG表现能够降低股价崩盘风险吗? [J]. 海南大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 42(4): 148-159.
[6] 何诚颖, 吕越, 冯鲍. 企业ESG表现对股价波动的影响——基于市场参与者行为的分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2025, 46(2): 103-122.
[7] 张子余, 耿林田, 王芳. ESG评级分歧与股价暴跌风险[J]. 上海金融, 2024(11): 31-43.
[8] 刘向强, 杨晴晴, 胡珺. ESG评级分歧与股价同步性[J]. 中国软科学, 2023(8): 108-120.
[9] Singh, A., Singh, P. and Shome, S. (2022) ESG-CFP Linkages: A Review of Its Antecedents and Scope for Future Research. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 15, 48-69.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09746862221089062
[10] Lins, K.V., Servaes, H. and Tamayo, A. (2017) Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72, 1785-1824.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
[11] Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. (2015) ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5, 210-233.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
[12] 白雄, 朱一凡, 韩锦绵. ESG表现、机构投资者偏好与企业价值[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2022, 37(10): 117-128.
[13] 冯乐乐, 马志强. ESG实践与企业价值创造——基于绿色技术和绿色管理创新视角[J]. 商业研究, 2025(3): 132-141.
[14] Ashwin Kumar, N.C., Smith, C., Badis, L., Wang, N., Ambrosy, P. and Tavares, R. (2016) ESG Factors and Risk-Adjusted Performance: A New Quantitative Model. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6, 292-300.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1234909
[15] 史永东, 王淏淼. 企业社会责任与公司价值——基于ESG风险溢价的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(6): 67-83.
[16] 狄灵瑜, 步丹璐. 非国有大股东与国有企业债务融资成本[J]. 财贸研究, 2022, 33(3): 94-109.
[17] 蔡春, 梁子慧. 外资持股与企业债务融资成本差异[J]. 中国软科学, 2022(5): 159-168.
[18] 鲍新中, 李佳航, 谢文静, 等. 知识产权自愿性信息披露、投资者信心与债务融资成本——来自创业板的文本信息证据[J]. 财务研究, 2023(4): 63-72.
[19] 王喜, 武玲玲, 邓晓兰. 环境信息披露、媒体关注与债务融资成本——基于重污染行业上市公司的分析[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 28(2): 67-78.
[20] Bae, K.H. and Goyal, V.K. (2009) Creditor Rights, Enforcement, and Bank Loans. The Journal of Finance, 64, 823-860.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01450.x
[21] 王彦超, 郭小敏, 余应敏. 反垄断与债务市场竞争中性[J]. 会计研究, 2020(7): 144-166.
[22] 曹越, 董怀丽, 彭可人, 等. “营改增”对公司债务融资成本的影响研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2021(8): 162-171.
[23] 王孝钰, 高琪, 邹汝康, 等. 商帮文化对企业融资行为的影响研究[J]. 会计研究, 2022(4): 168-178.
[24] 潘越, 宁博, 纪翔阁, 等. 民营资本的宗族烙印: 来自融资约束视角的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(7): 94-110.
[25] Gul, F.A., Zhou, G.S. and Zhu, X.K. (2013) Investor Protection, Firm Informational Problems, Big N Auditors, and Cost of Debt around the World. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32, 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50462
[26] 涂国前, 张家琪. 政府采购能改善企业融资效率吗?——基于企业融资成本视角[J]. 财政科学, 2023(10): 65-80.
[27] 王生年, 张佩. 企业ESG表现影响了商业信用融资吗? [J]. 现代财经(天津财经大学学报), 2023, 43(12): 59-77.
[28] 李广子, 刘力. 债务融资成本与民营信贷歧视[J]. 金融研究, 2009(12): 137-150.
[29] 廉永辉, 何晓月, 张琳. 企业ESG表现与债务融资成本[J]. 财经论丛, 2023(1): 48-58.
[30] Kaplan, S.N. and Zingales, L. (1997) Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169-215.
https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555163
[31] 武鹏, 杨科, 蒋峻松, 等. 企业ESG表现会影响盈余价值相关性吗? [J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(6): 137-152, 169.
[32] 李哲, 王文翰. “多言寡行”的环境责任表现能否影响银行信贷获取——基于“言”和“行”双维度的文本分析[J]. 金融研究, 2021(12): 116-132.