基于Cite Space的近10年(2016~2025)我国羽毛球研究热点与趋势可视化分析

A Visual Analysis of Badminton Research Hotspots and Trends in China over the Past Decade (2016~2025) Based on Cite Space

摘要: 教本研究以中国知网(CNKI)三大核心期刊数据库2016年1月至2025年12月间收录的174篇羽毛球研究文献为样本，运用Cite Space 6.4.R1软件进行作者合作网络、机构合作网络、关键词共现与聚类、时间线图谱及突现词检测等多维度可视化分析，系统梳理近十年我国羽毛球研究的知识结构、研究热点的演进轨迹、学术合作网络的格局及研究前沿的方向。结果表明：结果表明：(1) 研究力量呈局部聚集、整体分散形式，作者合作网络密度为0.0071，全部作者中介中心性为0，机构合作密度为0.0075，尚未形成核心作者群；(2) 文章发文量先升后降，年均20.8篇，2017年达峰值(44篇)，2024年为谷值(6篇)；(3) 热点集中于竞技体育与学校体育两大领域，聚类归纳为“羽毛球”“学生”“第32届夏季奥运会”“反应时”“骨密度”“改性”“触觉学习”7个聚类，主题经历三阶段演进；(4) 突现词“奥运备战”(强度1.66)与“学习策略”(强度1.12)先后突现，教学改革、信息化手段及跨项目比较正成新兴方向。本文旨在为羽毛球科研规划与学科建设提供参考。

Abstract: This teaching study uses 174 badminton research papers collected from the three core journal databases of CNKI (CNKI) from January 2016 to December 2025 as samples. Using Cite Space 6.4.R1 software, it conducts multidimensional visual analysis including author collaboration networks, institutional collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence and clustering, timeline graphs, and emergent word detection. The study systematically reviews the knowledge structure, development trajectories of research hotspots, the pattern of academic collaboration networks, and the directions of research frontiers in badminton research in China over the past decade. The results show: (1) Research forces are locally concentrated and overall dispersed, with author collaboration network density of 0.0071, intermediary centrality among all authors at 0, institutional collaboration density at 0.0075, and no core author group has yet to be formed; (2) The number of articles published first rose then decreased, averaging 20.8 per year, peaking in 2017 (44) and peaking in 2024 (6); (3) Hotspots are concentrated in two major fields: competitive sports and school sports, with clusters summarized as seven clusters: “Badminton,” “Students,” “32nd Summer Olympics,” “Reaction Time,” “Bone Density,” “Modification,” and “Tactile Learning,” with themes evolving in three stages; (4) The emerging words “Olympic preparation” (intensity 1.66) and “learning strategy” (intensity 1.12) have emerged one after another, with teaching reform, informatization methods, and cross-project comparison emerging as emerging directions. This paper aims to provide a reference for badminton research planning and discipline development.