浪漫依恋中关系质量与人际神经同步性的关系：依恋风格的调节作用
The Link between Relationship Quality and Interpersonal Neural Synchrony in Romantic Attachment: How Attachment Style Plays a Role
摘要: 关系质量与人际神经同步性(INS)是浪漫关系研究中的两个核心议题，但关系质量对INS的预测效果及其边界条件尚存争议。本综述讨论关系质量与浪漫伴侣INS的关联及依恋风格的调节机制，重点关注关系质量对INS的影响，同时讨论INS对关系质量的潜在反馈作用。研究表明，关系满意度、冲突水平与解决方式、感知恋人回应性三个维度通过影响互动中的认知情感过程，显著塑造INS的强度与模式。然而，这一预测受到依恋风格的显著调节：安全型依恋促进关系质量向高效INS的转化；焦虑型依恋因威胁监控过度激活，易导致高冲突下的病理性高同步；回避型依恋则通过情感抑制削弱INS，或形成功能性解耦。不同依恋组合使相同的关系质量产生差异化的神经同步结果。当前研究在纵向追踪、依恋组合的系统比较及临床转化等方面仍存在不足。未来应结合纵向设计与多模态技术，进一步检验INS作为依恋特异性评估与干预过程指标的可行性。
Abstract: The quality of relationships and interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) are two key topics in romantic relationship research, but there is still debate about how relationship quality predicts INS and its boundary conditions. This article provides a systematic review of the association between relationship quality and romantic partner INS, as well as the moderating role of attachment style, with a focus on the impact of relationship quality on INS, while also discussing the potential feedback effect of INS on relationship quality. Studies show that relationship satisfaction, conflict levels and resolution methods, and perceived partner responsiveness significantly shape the strength and patterns of INS by influencing cognitive and emotional processes during interactions. However, this prediction is significantly moderated by attachment style: secure attachment facilitates the conversion of relationship quality into efficient INS; anxious attachment, due to overactivation of threat monitoring, can lead to pathologically high synchrony under high conflict; avoidant attachment weakens INS through emotional suppression or creates functional decoupling. Different attachment pairings can result in varied neural synchrony outcomes even with the same relationship quality. Current research still has gaps in longitudinal tracking, systematic comparison of attachment pairings, and clinical translation. In the future, longitudinal design and multimodal technology should be combined to further examine the feasibility of INS as an indicator for attachment-specific assessment and intervention processes.
文章引用：李鑫玲 (2026). 浪漫依恋中关系质量与人际神经同步性的关系：依恋风格的调节作用. 心理学进展, 16(10), 190-198. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.1610483

参考文献

[1] Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L. (2012). Neural Correlates of Long-Term Intense Romantic Love. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 145-159.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq092
[2] Bilek, E., Zeidman, P., Kirsch, P., Tost, H., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., & Friston, K. (2022). Directed Coupling in Multi-Brain Networks Underlies Generalized Synchrony during Social Exchange. NeuroImage, 252, Article 119038.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119038
[3] Bizzego, A., Azhari, A., Campostrini, N., Truzzi, A., Ng, L. Y., Gabrieli, G. et al. (2020). Strangers, Friends, and Lovers Show Different Physiological Synchrony in Different Emotional States. Behavioral Sciences, 10, Article 11.
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010011
[4] Che, X., Zhang, Q., Zhao, J., Wei, D., Li, B., Guo, Y. et al. (2014). Synchronous Activation within the Default Mode Network Correlates with Perceived Social Support. Neuropsychologia, 63, 26-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.035
[5] Chen, Y., Liu, S., Hao, Y., Zhao, Q., Ren, J., Piao, Y. et al. (2024). Higher Emotional Synchronization Is Modulated by Relationship Quality in Romantic Relationships and Not in Close Friendships. NeuroImage, 297, Article 120733.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120733
[6] Conradi, H. J., Noordhof, A., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2021). Satisfying and Stable Couple Relationships: Attachment Similarity across Partners Can Partially Buffer the Negative Effects of Attachment Insecurity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 47, 682-697.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12477
[7] Cui, X., Bryant, D. M., & Reiss, A. L. (2012). NIRS-Based Hyperscanning Reveals Increased Interpersonal Coherence in Superior Frontal Cortex during Cooperation. NeuroImage, 59, 2430-2437.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.003
[8] Diamond, L. M., & Fagundes, C. P. (2010). Psychobiological Research on Attachment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 218-225.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360906
[9] Djalovski, A., Dumas, G., Kinreich, S., & Feldman, R. (2021). Human Attachments Shape Interbrain Synchrony toward Efficient Performance of Social Goals. NeuroImage, 226, Article 117600.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117600
[10] Doll, A., Hölzel, B. K., Mulej Bratec, S., Boucard, C. C., Xie, X., Wohlschläger, A. M. et al. (2016). Mindful Attention to Breath Regulates Emotions via Increased Amygdala-Prefrontal Cortex Connectivity. NeuroImage, 134, 305-313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.041
[11] Ein-Dor, T., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2011). Attachment Insecurities and the Processing of Threat-Related Information: Studying the Schemas Involved in Insecure People’s Coping Strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 78-93.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022503
[12] Feng, X., Sun, B., Chen, C., Li, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, W. et al. (2020). Self-Other Overlap and Interpersonal Neural Synchronization Serially Mediate the Effect of Behavioral Synchronization on Prosociality. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15, 203-214.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa017
[13] Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The Psychology of Close Relationships: Fourteen Core Principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 383-411.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038
[14] Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., Impett, E. A., & Asher, E. R. (2004). What Do You Do When Things Go Right? The Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Benefits of Sharing Positive Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 228-245.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.228
[15] Gillath, O., Bunge, S. A., Shaver, P. R., Wendelken, C., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment-Style Differences in the Ability to Suppress Negative Thoughts: Exploring the Neural Correlates. NeuroImage, 28, 835-847.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.048
[16] Gillath, O., Karantzas, G. C., Romano, D., & Karantzas, K. M. (2022). Attachment Security Priming: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26, 183-241.
https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211054592
[17] Gottman, J. M. (1993). The Roles of Conflict Engagement, Escalation, and Avoidance in Marital Interaction: A Longitudinal View of Five Types of Couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 6-15.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.61.1.6
[18] Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-Brain Coupling: A Mechanism for Creating and Sharing a Social World. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 114-121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007
[19] He, Y., Cheng, Z., Wang, X., Zhou, Z., Ying, K., Mu, Y. et al. (2025). Smile When Life Is Stranded: Positive Feedback Promotes Romantic Couples’ Cooperation and Neural Synchrony. Biological Psychology, 201, Article 109105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2025.109105
[20] Heng, W. X., Ng, L. Y., Goh, Z. Z., Esposito, G., & Azhari, A. (2025). Romantic Partners with Mismatched Relationship Satisfaction Showed Greater Interpersonal Neural Synchrony When Co-Viewing Emotive Videos: An Exploratory Pilot fNIRS Hyperscanning Study. NeuroSci, 6, Article 55.
https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci6020055
[21] Jia, S., Meng, Y., Gao, Y., Ao, L., Yang, L., Wang, H. et al. (2024). Romantic Relationships Attenuated Competition between Lovers: Evidence from Brain Synchronization. Cerebral Cortex, 34, bhae028.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae028
[22] Kenwood, M. M., Kalin, N. H., & Barbas, H. (2022). The Prefrontal Cortex, Pathological Anxiety, and Anxiety Disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47, 260-275.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z
[23] Kinreich, S., Djalovski, A., Kraus, L., Louzoun, Y., & Feldman, R. (2017). Brain-to-Brain Synchrony during Naturalistic Social Interactions. Scientific Reports, 7, Article No. 17060.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17339-5
[24] Li, L., Huang, X., Xiao, J., Zheng, Q., Shan, X., He, C. et al. (2022). Neural Synchronization Predicts Marital Satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, e2202515119.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202515119
[25] Long, Y., Chen, C., Wu, K., Zhou, S., Zhou, F., Zheng, L. et al. (2022). Interpersonal Conflict Increases Interpersonal Neural Synchronization in Romantic Couples. Cerebral Cortex, 32, 3254-3268.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab413
[26] Long, Y., Zheng, L., Zhao, H., Zhou, S., Zhai, Y., & Lu, C. (2021). Interpersonal Neural Synchronization during Interpersonal Touch Underlies Affiliative Pair Bonding between Romantic Couples. Cerebral Cortex, 31, 1647-1659.
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa316
[27] Mayo, O., & Gordon, I. (2020). In and Out of Synchrony—Behavioral and Physiological Dynamics of Dyadic Interpersonal Coordination. Psychophysiology, 57, e13574.
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13574
[28] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
[29] Norman, L., Lawrence, N., Iles, A., Benattayallah, A., & Karl, A. (2015). Attachment-Security Priming Attenuates Amygdala Activation to Social and Linguistic Threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 832-839.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu127
[30] Pan, Y., Cheng, X., Zhang, Z., Li, X., & Hu, Y. (2017). Cooperation in Lovers: An fNIRS-Based Hyperscanning Study. Human Brain Mapping, 38, 831-841.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23421
[31] Rafi, H., Bogacz, F., Sander, D., & Klimecki, O. (2020). Impact of Couple Conflict and Mediation on How Romantic Partners Are Seen: An fMRI Study. Cortex, 130, 302-317.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.036
[32] Ran, G., & Zhang, Q. (2018). The Neural Correlates of Attachment Style during Emotional Processing: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis. Attachment & Human Development, 20, 626-633.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1465105
[33] Reis, H. T. (2012). Perceived Partner Responsiveness as an Organizing Theme for the Study of Relationships and Well-Being. In L. Campbell, & T. J. Loving (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Research on Close Relationships: The Case for Integration. (pp. 27-52). American Psychological Association.
https://doi.org/10.1037/13486-002
[34] Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring Commitment Level, Satisfaction Level, Quality of Alternatives, and Investment Size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357-387.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
[35] Sened, H., Zilcha-Mano, S., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2022). Inter-Brain Plasticity as a Biological Mechanism of Change in Psychotherapy: A Review and Integrative Model. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, Article ID: 955238.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.955238
[36] Sezer, I., Pizzagalli, D. A., & Sacchet, M. D. (2022). Resting-State fMRI Functional Connectivity and Mindfulness in Clinical and Non-Clinical Contexts: A Review and Synthesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 135, Article 104583.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104583
[37] Sun, L., You, J., Sun, F., Cui, M., Wang, J., Wang, W. et al. (2021). Reactivating a Positive Feedback Loop VTA-BLA-NAC Circuit Associated with Positive Experience Ameliorates the Attenuated Reward Sensitivity Induced by Chronic Stress. Neurobiology of Stress, 15, Article 100370.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2021.100370
[38] Vrtička, P., Andersson, F., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2008). Individual Attachment Style Modulates Human Amygdala and Striatum Activation during Social Appraisal. PLOS ONE, 3, e2868.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002868
[39] Vrtička, P., Bondolfi, G., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012). The Neural Substrates of Social Emotion Perception and Regulation Are Modulated by Adult Attachment Style. Social Neuroscience, 7, 473-493.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.647410
[40] Walker, S. A., & Kunst, H. (2025). Helping or Holding Back? How Attachment Relates to the Regulation of Others in Close and Distant Relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 247, Article 113437.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2025.113437
[41] Wang, K., Li, F., Xu, J., Chen, S., & Zhou, M. (2023). Insecure Attachment May Not Hamper Relationships: A Dyadic Fit Perspective. Current Psychology, 42, 29215-29229.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04005-x
[42] Wass, S. V., Whitehorn, M., Marriott Haresign, I., Phillips, E., & Leong, V. (2020). Interpersonal Neural Entrainment during Early Social Interaction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24, 329-342.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.006
[43] Wu, X., Hao, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, H., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y. et al. (2025). Love in the Time of Zoom: How Intimacy Modulates Brain and Behaviour Synchrony in Face-To-Face versus Video Communication. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 20, nsaf070.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaf070
[44] Zoppolat, G., Alonso-Ferres, M., Righetti, F., Balzarini, R., & Slatcher, R. B. (2025). Shifting Signals: Fluctuations in Perceived Partner Responsiveness Predict Ambivalence in Romantic Relationships [Preprint]. OSF Preprints.