协同治理视角下智慧养老政策文本研究——以杭州市为例
Collaborative Governance Perspective on Smart Elderly Care Policy Text Research—A Case Study of Hangzhou
摘要: 随着我国老龄化程度持续加深,智慧养老已成为重构养老服务供给体系的重要政策方向。本文以杭州市智慧养老政策体系为研究对象,基于协同治理理论,构建“政策网络分析–政策文本分析–区域比较分析”的三层次分析框架,从结构、工具与空间三个维度对其运行机制与治理约束进行系统诊断。研究发现,杭州市智慧养老政策体系呈现出“强政府引导下的平台型协同治理”特征,政策工具配置以供给型为主导,需求型工具明显不足,且城乡差异显著。进一步分析表明,该体系面临数据“汇而不通”、协同结构失衡与制度化规则缺失三重治理约束,其深层共因在于高度依赖行政动员与项目驱动,缺乏稳定制度规则的刚性支撑。本文提出推动数据标准统一、构建多元主体制度化协同网络、建立数据驱动的政策复审机制等建议,以期为智慧养老政策优化提供参考。
Abstract: With the deepening of population aging in China, smart elderly care has become a significant policy direction for reshaping the elderly care service supply system. This study takes Hangzhou’s smart elderly care policy system as the research object and based on collaborative governance theory, constructs a three-tier analytical framework of “policy network analysis - policy text analysis - regional comparative analysis” to systematically diagnose its operational mechanisms and governance constraints from structural, instrumental, and spatial dimensions. The findings reveal that Hangzhou’s smart elderly care policy system exhibits the characteristics of a “platform-based collaborative governance model under strong government guidance”, with policy instruments predominantly supply-oriented, demand-oriented instruments significantly insufficient, and notable urban-rural disparities. Further analysis indicates that the system faces three governance constraints—fragmented data integration, imbalanced collaborative structure, and lack of institutionalized rules—with the underlying cause lying in its heavy reliance on administrative mobilization and project-driven approaches, lacking the rigid support of stable institutional rules. This paper proposes recommendations including promoting the unification of data standards, building an institutionalized collaborative network of diverse actors, and establishing a data-driven policy review mechanism, aiming to provide references for the optimization of smart elderly care policies.
文章引用:邢淄沂. 协同治理视角下智慧养老政策文本研究——以杭州市为例[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(10): 60-69. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.1510813

参考文献

[1] 2025年经济发展向新向优 预期目标圆满实现[EB/OL].
https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202601/t20260119_1962330.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com, 2026-01-19.
[2] 申琦, 李立哲, 蔡耀辉. 从探索产业布局到完善服务体系: 我国智慧养老政策的演化历程与问题探究[J]. 社会政策研究, 2024(3): 48-61+133.
[3] 韩烨, 于明新. 从制定到行动: 政策视野中的基本养老服务[J]. 兰州学刊, 2025(5): 151-162.
[4] 陈松林, 高丽杰, 樊婷婷. 智慧养老政策执行问题与对策研究——以安徽省为例[J]. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 35(1): 84-91.
[5] 苗晓娜, 杭嘉敏, 林家乐. 健康中国战略下我国现阶段医养结合发展困境分析[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2023, 36(12): 1364-1369.
[6] 明熙瑶, 吴婵君. 积极老龄化背景下智慧“医养结合”社区居家养老服务模式创新研究[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2025(3): 105-108.
[7] Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2008) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
[8] Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T. and Balogh, S. (2012) An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1-29.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
[9] 马香媛, 刘子含, 黄鹤. 合作配置活动理论视角下的居家养老模式探析——杭州养老社区的调查[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2021(4): 81-88.
[10] Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1984) An Assessment of Government Innovation Policies. Review of Policy Research, 3, 436-444.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00138.x
[11] 胡扬名, 刘鲜梅, 宫仁贵. 中国智慧养老产业政策量化研究: 基于三维分析框架视角[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 36(2): 78-88.
[12] 王勤升, 劳昕, 肖江曼. 长三角地区人口老龄化与养老资源空间错位及其驱动因素变化研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2026, 41(7): 2250-2266.
[13] 李长远. 智慧社区居家养老服务协同治理: 内在机理、现实梗阻与实践进路[J]. 江淮论坛, 2025(3): 127-134.
[14] 余晓艳, 赵银侠. 我国智慧养老政策发展及实践问题研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 37(5): 42-48.
[15] 叶光亮, 南靖杰, 陈逸豪. 政策评估视角下的公平竞争多元审查机制[J]. 社会科学战线, 2023(4): 57-69+281.