韧性治理视域下基层社会风险防控与公共危机治理优化研究
Research on Optimization of Grassroots Social Risk Prevention and Public Crisis Governance from the Perspective of Resilient Governance
摘要: 现代化社会转型进程中,社会结构分化、利益格局调整与外部不确定性因素叠加,促使各类复合型、突发性公共危机频发,基层作为风险防控与危机处置的前沿阵地,其治理能力直接决定公共危机应对的整体成效。传统刚性管控式危机治理模式,存在风险预判滞后、协同机制薄弱、应急资源适配性不足、事后修复体系不完善等诸多短板,难以适配新时代复杂社会风险的治理需求。韧性治理理论强调治理主体的主动适应、动态抵御与快速修复能力,为基层公共危机管理转型提供全新理论框架与实践路径。本文基于韧性治理核心内涵,结合当前基层社会风险与公共危机治理的现实现状,系统剖析治理实践中存在的突出问题,针对性提出优化基层风险防控、完善公共危机全流程管理的实践策略,为提升基层公共治理现代化水平、筑牢社会安全稳定防线提供理论参考与实践支撑。
Abstract: In the process of modern social transformation, the differentiation of social structures, adjustment of interest patterns and superimposed external uncertain factors have led to the frequent occurrence of various compound and sudden public crises. As the frontline of risk prevention and crisis disposal, grassroots governance capacity directly determines the overall effectiveness of public crisis response. The traditional rigid control model of crisis governance has many deficiencies such as lagging risk prediction, weak coordination mechanisms, insufficient adaptability of emergency resources and imperfect post-crisis restoration system, which can hardly meet the governance demands of complex social risks in the new era. The theory of resilient governance emphasizes the capacities of governance subjects in active adaptation, dynamic resistance and rapid recovery, providing a brand-new theoretical framework and practical path for the transformation of grassroots public crisis management. Based on the core connotation of resilient governance and combined with the current reality of grassroots social risk and public crisis governance, this paper systematically analyzes prominent problems in governance practice, puts forward targeted practical strategies to optimize grassroots risk prevention and improve the whole-process management of public crises, and offers theoretical references and practical support for advancing the modernization of grassroots public governance and consolidating the defense line of social security and stability.
文章引用:周亚梅. 韧性治理视域下基层社会风险防控与公共危机治理优化研究[J]. 现代管理, 2026, 16(10): 59-66. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2026.1610223

参考文献

[1] Norris, F.H., Stevens, S.P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K.F. and Pfefferbaum, R.L. (2008) Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 127-150.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6
[2] 朱正威, 刘莹莹, 杨洋. 韧性治理: 中国韧性城市建设的实践与探索[J]. 公共管理与政策评论, 2021, 10(3): 22-31.
[3] 吴新叶. 超大型城市社区应急治理的韧性路径探索[J]. 北京社会科学, 2023(9): 83-94.
[4] 陈思. 新时代基层应急能力建设的现实困境与优化路径[J]. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 25(6): 134-142.
[5] 陶希东. 中国超大特大韧性城市建设: 理论逻辑、实践探索与路径选择[J]. 南京社会科学, 2025(7): 65-73.
[6] 周利敏, 原伟麒. 迈向韧性城市的灾害治理——基于多案例研究[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2017(5): 22-33.
[7] 张勤, 郭嘉诚. 中国式城市社区韧性治理现代化的实践探索、挑战与现实路径[J]. 社会治理, 2023(5): 100-107.
[8] 邵亦文, 徐江. 城市韧性: 基于国际文献综述的概念解析[J]. 国际城市规划, 2015, 30(2): 48-54.
[9] 蓝煜昕, 张雪. 社区韧性及其实现路径: 基于治理体系现代化的视角[J]. 行政管理改革, 2020(8): 73-81.
[10] 吕孝礼, 付帅泽, 朱宪, 等. 突发事件协同研判行为研究: 研究进展与关键科学问题[J]. 中国科学基金, 2020, 34(6): 693-702.
[11] 许欢. 技术与制度的双向赋能: 提升基层应急管理数字化水平[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2025(2): 72-82.
[12] 苗青, 林景. 基层政府与社会组织应急协同何以增效[J]. 公共管理学报, 2026, 23(1): 102-113.
[13] 何荣山, 李婧煜. 共同体视域下“五社联动”构建韧性社区治理现代化体系研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 30(6): 286-300.
[14] 卢毅. 提升基层应急管理效能[J]. 国家治理, 2026(15): 53-57.
[15] 李智, 张桃梅. 韧性治理何以实现: 城市社区应急管理的困境与因应[J]. 理论导刊, 2024(5): 69-78.