市场监管部门数字化监管优化路径研究——以上海市H区为例
Research on the Optimization Path of Digital Regulation by Market Regulation Departments—A Case Study of District H, Shanghai
摘要: 本文以上海市H区为对象,基于问卷与深度访谈,分析基层市场监管数字化转型困境。该区已部署29个平台,虽实现电子留痕与远程监督,但因重复建设、数据标准缺失、操作复杂,导致经营主体填报负担重、风险预警弱、配合意愿低。主因在于顶层设计不足、跨部门协同不畅、监管人员数字素养欠缺、财政激励与数据安全保障不到位。为解决此困境,制度层面推进市级统筹一体化平台,统一接口与入口;治理层面结合企业补贴、公众宣传与协会引导,推动平台与第三方机构、行业协会对接;公共服务层面以公共利益和公众需求为导向,通过回应主体诉求和促进多元参与提升治理效能。结论指出,智慧监管突破在于以平台融合为载体、数字赋能为支撑、多元共治为内核的整体重构。未来需拓展区域比较研究,并纳入算法伦理与数据公平性。
Abstract: Taking District H in Shanghai as a case study, this paper analyzes the dilemmas of digital transformation in grassroots market regulation based on questionnaires and in-depth interviews. Although the district has deployed 29 platforms that enable electronic trail retention and remote supervision, issues such as redundant construction, a lack of data standards, and operational complexity have led to heavy reporting burdens on business entities, weak risk early warning capabilities, and low willingness to cooperate. The main reasons lie in insufficient top-level design, poor cross-departmental collaboration, a lack of digital literacy among regulators, and inadequate financial incentives and data security safeguards. To address these dilemmas, the study proposes the following measures: institutionally, promoting a municipally coordinated integrated platform with unified interfaces and access points; in terms of governance, combining enterprise subsidies, public awareness campaigns, and industry association guidance to facilitate the docking of platforms with third-party institutions and industry associations; guided by public interests and public demands at the public-service level, governance effectiveness is enhanced by responding to stakeholders’ appeals and fostering multi-participation. The conclusion highlights that the breakthrough in smart regulation lies in the holistic reconstruction using platform integration as the carrier, digital empowerment as the support, and multi-stakeholder co-governance as the core. Future research should expand regional comparative studies and incorporate algorithmic ethics and data equity.
文章引用:王闰东. 市场监管部门数字化监管优化路径研究——以上海市H区为例[J]. 现代管理, 2026, 16(10): 67-77. https://doi.org/10.12677/mm.2026.1610224

参考文献

[1] 林志明, 宋君. 当前地方政府数字治理的困境与突破路径[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2022, 25(19): 213-218.
[2] 胡昊泽. 提升基层智慧监管应用效能与积极性的实践与思考——以湖北省食品安全智慧监管为例[J]. 中国食品安全, 2025(10): 69-73.
[3] 张君维, 谭敏清, 闫小良, 王凤娇, 韩春晓, 齐亚光. 人工智能技术驱动市场监管智慧化转型研究[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2025(10): 54-57.
[4] 杨宇, 顾斓芳. 化工企业双重预防机制数字化建设的探索[J]. 山东化工, 2025, 54(9): 248-250.
[5] 薛珊勇. 浙江食品安全数字化监管问题研究——以“浙食链”系统为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 长春工业大学, 2025.
[6] 旷瑾. 多重因素影响下市场监管的难点与思考——以餐饮分时共享模式为例[J]. 中国食品安全, 2025(1): 60-63.
[7] 张国栋. 标准化建设助力智慧监管研究[J]. 质量与标准化, 2024(6): 53-56.
[8] 杜玉春, 张小劲. 市场监管部门面向“十五五”纵深推进智慧监管的挑战与对策[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2025(10): 48-54.
[9] 王南博. A市市场监督管理局食品安全监管优化路径研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2025.
[10] 范良聪. 论互联网平台的合规监管[J]. 内蒙古社会科学, 2024, 45(3): 100-109.
[11] 陈莹. 数字赋能社会治理现代化的市场监管路径——以萧山区宁围街道全域联动大调解为样本[J]. 中国市场监管研究, 2024(5): 76-80.
[12] 王磊. 上海市交通建设市场行政检查数字化应用探讨[J]. 交通与港航, 2024, 11(S1): 100-103.
[13] 郑智云. “互联网 + 市场监督管理”的思考探讨[J]. 中国质量监管, 2024(11): 94-95.
[14] 王奥洋. H市X区市场监管人员综合行政执法能力提升策略研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2025.