切斯特曼翻译伦理视角下《你当像鸟飞往你的山》汉译翻译策略研究
A Study on Chinese Translation Strategies of Educated: A Memoir from the Perspective of Chesterman’s Translation Ethics
摘要: 本研究以切斯特曼的五大翻译伦理模式为分析框架,系统考察任爱红译本在再现、服务、交际、规范及承诺五个维度下的翻译策略选择,揭示各伦理维度之间的侧重差异及其动态制衡关系。研究发现,自传体文学兼具审美性与纪实性,译者在忠实再现原作文本风貌的同时需兼顾目标读者的接受习惯,而伦理视角正可解释译者“为何做出这些选择”的深层动因,为既有女性主义与接受美学取向的研究提供有益补充。任爱红译本的翻译实践表明,在多重伦理准则之间构建动态平衡是自传体文学翻译成功的关键。本研究作为宏观框架下的基础性分析,仍存在案例数量有限、伦理冲突与协调机制探讨尚浅等局限,未来可扩大语料范围,引入多译本对比与读者接受调查等实证方法,以进一步深化对翻译伦理影响策略选择的理解。
Abstract: This study employs Chesterman’s five ethical models of translation as its analytical framework to systematically examine the strategic choices made in Ren Aihong’s translation across five dimensions: representation, service, communication, normativity, and commitment. It aims to elucidate the differing emphases among these ethical dimensions and their dynamic interrelationships. The research finds that autobiographical literature possesses both aesthetic and documentary qualities; consequently, translators must not only faithfully reproduce the stylistic features of the source text but also consider the reception habits of target readers. From an ethical perspective, this approach can help explain the translator’s underlying motivations and answer the question of “why the translator made such strategic choices”, thereby providing valuable supplementary insights to existing research grounded in feminist theory and reception aesthetics. The translational practice of Ren Aihong’s work demonstrates that establishing a dynamic balance among multiple ethical criteria is pivotal to the success of translating autobiographical literature. As a foundational analysis conducted within a macro-level framework, this study still faces certain limitations, including a relatively limited number of case studies and insufficient exploration of ethical conflicts and their resolution mechanisms. Future research could expand the corpus of texts, incorporate comparative analyses of multiple translations, and employ empirical methods such as reader reception surveys, thereby further deepening the understanding of how translation ethics influence strategic decision-making.
文章引用:梁龙飞. 切斯特曼翻译伦理视角下《你当像鸟飞往你的山》汉译翻译策略研究[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(10): 209-215. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.1410984

参考文献

[1] Chesterman, A. (2001) Proposal for a Hieronymic Oath. The Translator, 7, 139-154.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2001.10799097
[2] 陈志杰, 吕俊. 译者的责任选择——对切斯特曼翻译伦理思想的反思[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2011(1): 62-65.
[3] 任晓光, 赵莹莹. 论切斯特曼翻译伦理模式及其缺陷——从“爱的伦理”到“翻译的爱” [J]. 韶关学院学报, 2015(5): 123-126.
[4] 陈振东. 翻译的伦理: 切斯特曼的五大伦理模式[J]. 国外理论动态, 2010(3): 85-88.
[5] 郝军. 翻译伦理视域下的译者主体性研究——以孙致礼《傲慢与偏见》中译本为例[J]. 广东外语外贸大学学报, 2013, 24(2): 76-78.
[6] 李慧君. 切斯特曼翻译伦理五种模式分析与改进[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2010.
[7] 张静. 从切斯特曼的五大翻译伦理模式看翻译策略[J]. 文学界(理论版), 2010(9): 119+124.
[8] 梅阳春. 翻译的承诺伦理——传统翻译伦理的逾越[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 24(6): 97-101.
[9] 陈金金. 切斯特曼五大翻译伦理模式的补充与改进[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 上海外国语大学, 2012.