从终结性走向过程性:商务英语“金课”教学评价的学生需求与实现路径
From Summative to Process-Oriented Evaluation: Student Needs and Implementation Pathways for Teaching Evaluation in Business English “Golden Courses”
摘要: “金课”建设对课程评价提出了从重结果转向重过程的要求,学生作为评价的直接对象,其需求构成转型设计的重要依据。本文基于147份商务英语专业学生问卷,综合运用频数统计、卡方检验与Fisher精确检验等方法,从学生需求视角分析了现行教学评价的问题感知与过程性评价需求。结果显示:学生对现行评价呈“整体满意、细节不满”状态,整体满意度为86.3%,但评价方式单一(44.2%)、反馈不及时(40.1%)、个性化反馈缺失(46.9%)等问题突出;学生需求明确指向“诊断–反馈–改进”的过程性评价内核,薄弱知识点诊断需求达90.5%,居各项期望服务之首;AI工具使用率达96.6%,终结性考核的效度面临挑战。基于上述发现,本文构建了“痛点诊断–需求证据–要素映射–实现路径”的分析框架,提出涵盖过程性表现评价、诊断性反馈机制、多元评价主体与能力导向考核四要素的实现路径,并从数据支撑、隐私保护与实施保障三方面给出配套建议,为商务英语“金课”评价转型提供了参考。
Abstract: The construction of “golden courses” has placed new demands on course evaluation, calling for a shift from outcome-oriented to process-oriented evaluation. As the direct subjects of evaluation, students’ needs constitute a key basis for the design of this transformation. Drawing on a questionnaire survey of 147 Business English majors and employing frequency analysis, chi-square tests, and Fisher’s exact tests, this study examines students’ perceptions of the problems in the current teaching evaluation system and their needs for process-oriented evaluation. The results show that students are generally satisfied with the current system while dissatisfied with its specific aspects: overall satisfaction reaches 86.3%, yet problems such as homogeneous evaluation methods (44.2%), untimely feedback (40.1%), and the absence of personalized feedback (46.9%) remain prominent. Students’ needs clearly point to the “diagnosis - feedback - improvement” cycle at the core of process-oriented evaluation, with the demand for diagnosis of weak knowledge areas reaching 90.5%, the highest among all expected services. The utilization rate of AI tools reaches 96.6%, posing a challenge to the validity of summative assessment. Based on these findings, this study develops an analytical framework of “problem diagnosis - needs evidence - element mapping - implementation pathway”, proposes an implementation pathway comprising four elements, namely process-based performance evaluation, diagnostic feedback mechanisms, diversified evaluation subjects, and competence-oriented assessment, and offers supporting recommendations regarding data support, privacy protection, and implementation safeguards, providing a reference for the evaluation transformation of Business English “golden courses”.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
教育部关于狠抓新时代全国高等学校本科教育工作会议精神落实的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201809/t20180903_347079.html, 2018-08-27.
|
|
[2]
|
吴岩. 建设中国“金课” [J]. 中国大学教学, 2018(12): 4-9.
|
|
[3]
|
教育部高等学校外国语言文学类专业教学指导委员会. 普通高等学校本科专业类教学质量国家标准(外国语言文学类) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018.
|
|
[4]
|
陆国栋. 治理“水课”打造“金课” [J]. 中国大学教学, 2018(9): 23-25.
|
|
[5]
|
邓忠波. 大学课程中“水课”现象审视与“金课”建设进路[J]. 中国电化教育, 2020(4): 68-74.
|
|
[6]
|
Scriven, M. (1967) The Methodology of Evaluation. In: Tyler, R.W., Gagné, R.M. and Scriven, M., Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, Rand McNally, 39-83.
|
|
[7]
|
Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T. and Madaus, G.F. (1971) Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. McGraw-Hill.
|
|
[8]
|
Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
|
|
[9]
|
赵德成. 教学中的形成性评价: 是什么及如何推进[J]. 教育科学研究, 2013(3): 47-51.
|
|
[10]
|
王华, 富长洪. 形成性评估在外语教学中的应用研究综述[J]. 外语界, 2006(4): 67-72.
|
|
[11]
|
曹荣平, 张文霞, 周燕. 形成性评估在中国大学非英语专业英语写作教学中的运用[J]. 外语教学, 2004, 25(5): 82-87.
|
|
[12]
|
范敏. 商务英语专业本科翻译教学形成性评价研究[J]. 外语与翻译, 2020, 27(2): 64-69.
|
|
[13]
|
Spady, W.G. (1994) Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators.
|
|
[14]
|
李志义. 成果导向的教学设计[J]. 中国大学教学, 2015(3): 32-39.
|
|
[15]
|
文秋芳. 构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015, 47(4): 547-558.
|
|
[16]
|
文秋芳. “师生合作评价”: “产出导向法”创设的新评价形式[J]. 外语界, 2016(5): 37-43.
|
|
[17]
|
顾小清, 张进良, 蔡慧英. 学习分析: 正在浮现中的数据技术[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2012, 30(1): 18-25.
|
|
[18]
|
魏顺平. 学习分析技术: 挖掘大数据时代下教育数据的价值[J]. 现代教育技术, 2013, 23(2): 5-11.
|