线性文化空间视角下平陆运河沿线旅游资源保护利用的逻辑、困境与路径
The Logic, Dilemmas, and Paths of Tourism Resource Protection and Utilization along the Pinglu Canal from the Perspective of Linear Cultural Space
摘要: 平陆运河既是西部陆海新通道的骨干工程,也是连接西江水系与北部湾、重构广西江海联系的重要线性载体。结合线性文化遗产与文化–生态–旅游协调发展研究,本文从线性文化空间视角分析沿线旅游资源的构成、关联结构、保护利用现状及治理困境。研究认为:平陆运河沿线形成了以水系为自然基底、以江海交通史为时间脉络、以聚落和遗存为物质节点、以非遗和社区生活为活态内容的复合文化空间;其核心价值并非资源数量的简单叠加,而在于不同资源之间持续形成的空间、历史和社会联系。当前保护利用主要面临文化价值阐释与线性组织脱节、跨区域跨部门协同及公共服务不足、保护与利用边界及项目管控机制不清、社区参与和利益联结不足、数字治理与动态监测能力薄弱等五方面困境。为此,应从单体景点管理转向线性文化空间治理,通过建立资源分级分区与项目准入体系、构建江海文化解释和分级线路组织、健全跨区域协同治理、完善社区共建共享机制、打造数字化监测与公共服务底座,推动平陆运河沿线旅游资源实现整体保护、差异化利用与持续治理。
Abstract: The Pinglu Canal is not only a backbone project of the Western Land-Sea New Corridor, but also an important linear carrier connecting the Xijiang River system with the Beibu Gulf and reconstructing the river-sea connection in Guangxi. Combining research on linear cultural heritage and the coordinated development of culture, ecology, and tourism, this paper analyzes the composition, relational structure, current status of protection and utilization, and governance challenges of tourism resources along the canal from the perspective of linear cultural space. The study argues that the Pinglu Canal has formed a complex cultural space with the water system as its natural foundation, the history of river-sea transportation as its temporal context, settlements and relics as material nodes, and intangible cultural heritage and community life as its living content. Its core value lies not in the simple accumulation of resource quantity, but in the continuous spatial, historical, and social connections formed between different resources. Currently, its protection and utilization mainly face five challenges: a disconnect between cultural value interpretation and linear organization; insufficient cross-regional and cross-departmental collaboration and public services; unclear boundaries between protection and utilization and project management mechanisms; insufficient community participation and interest linkage; and weak digital governance and dynamic monitoring capabilities. Therefore, the focus should shift from managing individual scenic spots to governing linear cultural spaces. This can be achieved by establishing a resource grading and zoning system and project access criteria, constructing an interpretation of river and sea culture and a tiered route organization, improving cross-regional collaborative governance, perfecting community co-construction and sharing mechanisms, and building a digital monitoring and public service foundation. This will promote the overall protection, differentiated utilization, and sustainable governance of tourism resources along the Pinglu Canal.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张书颖, 刘家明, 朱鹤, 等. 线性文化遗产的特征及其对旅游利用模式的影响——基于《世界遗产名录》的统计分析[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2021, 11(2): 203-216.
|
|
[2]
|
厉建梅, 单梦琦, 齐佳. 大运河文化带沿线城市文化-生态-旅游耦合协调发展[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(10): 201-207.
|
|
[3]
|
言唱. 大运河非物质文化遗产的活态保护与活化利用[J]. 海南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 33(3): 136-140.
|
|
[4]
|
Nared, J. and Razpotnik Visković, N. (Eds.) (2014) Managing Cultural Heritage Sites in Southeastern Europe. Založba ZRC, 128.
|
|
[5]
|
任唤麟, 吴殿廷, 陶卓民, 等. 跨区域线性文化遗产类旅游资源价值评价——以长安-天山廊道路网中国段为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(10): 1568-1576.
|
|
[6]
|
李雪, 赵云. 可持续发展视野下的国家文化公园主体功能区研究——以大运河为例[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2021(5): 37-43.
|
|
[7]
|
邹统钎, 韩全, 常东芳. 中国国家公园与国家文化公园管理体制机制比较及其启示[J]. 自然资源学报, 2023, 38(9): 2283-2295.
|
|
[8]
|
Cai, Z., Fang, C., Zhang, Q. and Chen, F. (2021) Joint Development of Cultural Heritage Protection and Tourism: The Case of Mount Lushan Cultural Landscape Heritage Site. Heritage Science, 9, Article No. 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-021-00558-5
|