目的论视角下文学作品汉译研究——以《鲁滨逊漂流记》郭建中译本节选为例
A Study on the Translation of Literary Works from the Perspective of Skopos Theory—Taking the Excerpt from Guo Jianzhong’s Translation of Robinson Crusoe as an Example
摘要: 文学翻译是全球化背景下信息交换的重要一环。文学翻译实际上是在不同文化之间架设桥梁。目的论自二十世纪七十年代由弗米尔创立以来,在翻译研究领域产生了深远影响,尤其是文学翻译领域。然而从目的论视角研究文学翻译的案例仍不够丰富,对经典文学作品的翻译研究仍需深化。本文以目的论为理论框架,以郭建中的《鲁滨逊漂流记》节选中译本为研究对象,从目的原则、连贯原则和忠实原则三大原则进行系统分析。研究发现,灵活运用中文四字、语序调整、增译与减译等翻译技巧,能使译文在保持语义连贯的同时实现对源文的有效忠实,为目的论指导文学翻译的适用性提供理论参考与实践基础。
Abstract: Literary translation is an important part of information exchange in the context of globalization. In essence, literary translation bridges different cultures. Since its establishment by Vermeer in the 1970s, Skopos theory has exerted a far-reaching influence in the field of translation studies, especially in the field of literary translation. However, case studies on literary translation from the perspective of Skopos theory remain insufficient, and the translation studies of classic literary works still need to be further deepened. This paper takes Skopos theory as the theoretical framework and Guo Jianzhong’s Chinese translation of excerpts from Robinson Crusoe as the research object, conducting a systematic analysis from the three principles: the Skopos rule, the coherence rule and the fidelity rule. The findings reveal that the flexible use of translation techniques such as Chinese four-character structures, syntactic adjustment, amplification and omission can enable the target text to achieve effective fidelity to the source text while maintaining semantic coherence, thereby providing theoretical references and practical foundations for the applicability of Skopos theory in guiding literary translation.
文章引用:张天霖, 申卫华. 目的论视角下文学作品汉译研究——以《鲁滨逊漂流记》郭建中译本节选为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(10): 259-265. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.1410990

参考文献

[1] Nord, C. (2016) Function + Loyalty: Theology Meets Skopos. Open Theology, 2, 566-580.
https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2016-0045
[2] Abdelkarim, M.B.A., Alhaj, A.A.M. and Hakami, A.H. (2025) Faithfulness in the Translation of the Qur’anic Arabic Homographic Word Kataba (كَتَبَ) into English: Revisiting the Equivalence Theory. World Journal of English Language, 16, 248-258.
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v16n1p248
[3] 张锦兰. 目的论与翻译方法[J]. 中国科技翻译, 2004, 17(1): 35-37+13.
[4] 许艳琳, 杨成虎. 目的论视角下的旅游景区文本英译——以宁波市月湖公园为例[J]. 英语广场, 2025(7): 24-27.
[5] 段自力. 翻译目的论介评[J]. 渝州大学学报(社会科学版), 2000(2): 81-84.
[6] 胡作友. 德国功能派翻译理论述评[J]. 学术界, 2008(6): 249-255.
[7] 潘平亮. 翻译目的论及其文本意识的弱化倾向[J]. 上海翻译, 2006(1): 13-17.
[8] 陈小慰. 对德国翻译功能目的论的修辞反思[J]. 外语研究, 2012(1): 91-95.
[9] 陈百琴. 目的论在特殊文本翻译中的局限性[J]. 安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 37(5): 50-51.
[10] 王金海. 目的论在文学翻译中的局限性[J]. 长沙铁道学院学报(社会科学版), 2014, 15(3): 124-125.
[11] 邢丹凤. 目的论视阈下的英译汉翻译实践报告: 以《大博弈》(第十章至十一章)为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2017.
[12] 王庭宏. 敬礼, 孤岛上的英雄——《鲁滨逊漂流记》导读[J]. 初中生必读, 2014(Z1): 86-88.
[13] 王蕾. 叙事模式与叙事语篇分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 湘潭: 湘潭大学, 2007.
[14] 聂小星. 论导游口译中克服跨文化交际障碍的翻译策略[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2014.
[15] 笛福. 鲁滨逊漂流记[M]. 郭建中, 译. 南京: 译林出版社, 2000.