“创客–项目–竞赛”三联动教学模式在《机器人技术及其应用》课程中的改革与实践
Reform and Practice of the “Maker-Project-Competition” Three-Linkage Teaching Mode in the Course of “Robotics Technology and Its Applications”
摘要: 针对当前《机器人技术及其应用》课程重理论轻实践、跨学科知识碎片化、创新培育不足等痛点,本研究立足新工科人才培养目标,提出生成式AI赋能的“创客–项目–竞赛”三联动教学模式。构建以学生工程创新能力为核心、“基础技能–综合应用–原创突破”三级梯度路径的“一核三环三级”架构,打通创客空间、企业项目与竞赛平台边界,形成“灵感激发–实践落地–迭代检验”动态闭环。依托协作机器人、虚拟仿真与AI助手构建模块化资源库,建立“过程 + 成果 + 竞赛”三维评价体系。通过平行班对照实验的多维度验证(成绩分析、竞赛成果、创新能力量表及访谈),证实该模式显著提升学生工程实践及跨学科协作能力,为同类课程改革提供可复制范式。
Abstract: A generative AI-empowered tri-coupled teaching model that integrates “Maker-Project-Competition” was proposed, addressing the critical challenges in the Robotics Technology and Its Applications course—namely, the overemphasis on theory at the expense of hands-on practice, fragmentation of interdisciplinary knowledge, and insufficient cultivation of innovation—this study, grounded in the educational objectives of Emerging Engineering Education. The “One Core, Three Rings, Three Tiers” framework was constructed, with student engineering innovation capability as the core, and a three-level progressive pathway comprising fundamental skills, comprehensive application, and original breakthrough. This framework bridges the boundaries among maker spaces, enterprise projects, and competition platforms, thereby forming a dynamic closed loop of “inspiration generation - practical implementation - iterative validation”. Leveraging collaborative robots, virtual simulation, and AI-assistant tools, we developed a modular resource repository and established a three-dimensional evaluation system encompassing process, outcomes, and competition performance. Through multi-faceted validation via parallel-class controlled experiments-including academic performance analysis, competition achievements, innovation capability scales, and interview data—we demonstrate that the proposed model significantly enhances students’ engineering practice and interdisciplinary collaboration abilities, which providing a replicable paradigm for analogous curriculum reforms.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
吴岩. 新工科: 高等工程教育的未来——对高等教育未来的战略思考[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018(6): 1-3.
|
|
[2]
|
钟登华. 新工科建设的内涵与行动[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017(3): 1-6.
|
|
[3]
|
姚辉晶, 江本赤, 刘玉飞. 新工科背景下“机器人学”课程教学改革探索与实践[J]. 科技风, 2024(19): 102-104.
|
|
[4]
|
顾小清, 王成梁, 王培均. 生成式人工智能赋能教学的机制, 需求与路径[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2025(4): 15-22.
|
|
[5]
|
Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall.
|
|
[6]
|
李海荣, 胡顺. 基于CiteSpace的国内创客教育研究现状可视化分析[J]. 中阿科技论坛(中英文), 2022(9): 165-169.
|
|
[7]
|
龙迎春, 韩竺秦, 曾祥锋. 新工科背景下机器人工程专业人才培养课程体系构建的探索[J]. 高教学刊, 2021, 7(30): 147-150+155.
|
|
[8]
|
刘辉翔, 吴坚创, 陈雯柏. 智能机器人仿真实验平台设计策略研究[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2025, 31(2): 59-69.
|