个人信息保护的行政规制路径
The Administrative Regulation Path of Personal Information Protection
摘要: 公民个人信息保护一直以来都是通过相关法律救济和行政规制两种途径。法律救济以侵权为前提,注重事后惩戒与恢复受害者合法权益,但在大数据时代下,由于个人信息权利主体与处理主体地位不平衡,导致权利主体维权难度高、举证困难,并且损害往往不以传统侵害方式显现。行政规制以国家公权力为保障,通过专业性、强制性的规定,在治理效率、事前预防具有比较优势。因此,对于个人信息保护可以加强行政规制,通过制定行政标准在事前予以预防,同时对于行政机关可能存在的侵犯个人信息现象,通过行政复议、行政诉讼以及行政赔偿,保障公民的权利免受非法侵犯。
Abstract: The protection of personal information of citizens has always been a part of legal remedies and administrative legislation. Legal remedies are based on infringement, with a focus on punishing and restoring the legitimate rights and interests of victims afterwards. However, in the era of big data, due to the imbalance between the status of the subject of personal information rights and the status of the processing subject, it is difficult to protect the rights of legal subjects and provide evidence. In traditional infringement methods, the damage is often invisible. Administrative management protected by public power has comparative advantages in effective management and prevention through professional and mandatory supervision. In this way, it is possible to strengthen administrative management of personal data protection, prevent infringement of personal data by formulating administrative standards, and protect citizens’ rights from illegal infringement through administrative reconsideration, administrative litigation and compensation for infringement of personal data by administrative agencies.
文章引用:颜石. 个人信息保护的行政规制路径[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(10): 101-112. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.1410283

参考文献

[1] 龚正. 旅游者个人信息保护行政规制研究[J]. 浙江海洋大学学报(人文科学版), 2023, 40(1): 24-29.
[2] 付建彬. 刍议患者隐私保护——从某医师泄露明星病历被行拘案件谈起[J]. 中国医学人文, 2024, 10(3): 64-65.
[3] 孔祥稳. 论个人信息保护的行政规制路径[J]. 行政法学研究, 2022(1): 131-145.
[4] 梁根林. 罪刑法定原则: 挑战、重申与重述——刑事影响力案件引发的思考与检讨[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(6): 61-87.
[5] 崔聪聪. 个人信息保护的行政监管及展开[J]. 苏州大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 43(5): 73-84.
[6] 廖明, 刘硕磊. 数据公司收集使用信息的合规风险[J]. 人民检察, 2020(4): 57-59.
[7] 彭錞. 论国家机关的个人信息保护法律责任——以《个人信息保护法》第68条为切入点[J]. 比较法学研究, 2023(2): 31-43.