不同栽培模式对引种半夏块茎品质的影响
Effects of Different Cultivation Modes on the Tuber Quality of Introduced Pinellia ternata
DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2026.1610178, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 杨 帆, 范海霞, 郑吉发:江西农业工程职业学院,江西 宜春
关键词: 半夏;栽培模式;品质评价;农艺性状;经济效益;Pinellia ternate; Cultivation Mode; Quality Evaluation; Agronomic Trait; Economic Benefit
摘要: 为探讨樟树地区不同栽培模式对引种半夏块茎品质的影响,本研究设置空白对照组(露地)、林下组、野生组和江香薷套种组4种处理,通过显微鉴别及含水分、总灰分、浸出物、总生物碱含量等指标对半夏块茎进行质量评价。同时测定株高、叶面积、块茎直径等农艺性状,并核算各模式的经济效益。结果表明:4组半夏粉末显微特征无明显差异;各组含水分差异不大;总灰分含量以野生组最高,林下组最低;浸出物含量以江香薷套种组最高,野生组最低,4组均高于《中国药典》标准;总生物碱含量以江香薷套种组最高、灰分含量较低。套种组的株高、叶面积和块茎直径均显著优于其他处理;经济效益分析显示套种组净收益最高。综合品质、产量与经济效益,江香薷套种组为最优栽培模式,适度遮阴结合规范田间管理可有效提升引种半夏的药材品质。
Abstract: To investigate the effects of different cultivation modes on the tuber quality of introduced Pinellia ternata in Zhangshu area, four treatments were set up in this study: blank control group (open field), under-forest group, wild group and Elsholtzia blanda intercropping group. The quality of P. ternata tubers was evaluated by microscopic identification and indicators such as moisture content, total ash, extractives, and total alkaloid content. Meanwhile, agronomic traits such as plant height, leaf area, and tuber diameter were measured, and the economic benefits of each mode were calculated. The results showed that: there were no significant differences in the microscopic characteristics of P. ternata powder among the four groups; the moisture content of each group was similar; the total ash content was the highest in the wild group and the lowest in the under-forest group; the extractives content was the highest in the E. blanda intercropping group and the lowest in the wild group, and all four groups were higher than the standard of Chinese Pharmacopoeia; the total alkaloid content was the highest in the E. blanda intercropping group, with lower ash content. The plant height, leaf area, and tuber diameter of the intercropping group were significantly better than those of other treatments; the economic benefit analysis showed that the intercropping group had the highest net income. Considering comprehensive quality, yield and economic benefits, the E. blanda intercropping group was the optimal cultivation mode, and moderate shading combined with standardized field management could effectively improve the medicinal quality of introduced P. ternata.
文章引用:杨帆, 范海霞, 郑吉发. 不同栽培模式对引种半夏块茎品质的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2026, 16(10): 1489-1496. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjas.2026.1610178

参考文献

[1] 国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典: 一部[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2025.
[2] 何扬渺, 廖书恒, 孙尚萍. 杨忠光运用瓜蒌薤白半夏汤治疗新冠后遗症的临床经验浅析[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2024, 33(16): 74-76.
[3] 周志伟, 李嫣然, 李海英. 半夏药材的进出口贸易现状及产业化发展思考[J]. 中药材, 2022, 45(5): 1021-1028.
[4] 王化东, 吴发明. 我国半夏资源调查研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(1): 150-151, 200.
[5] 郝征, 何富强, 靳茜, 等. 不同品种半夏品质比较研究[J]. 黑龙江科学, 2022, 13(20): 5-7.
[6] 李希凡, 韩红梅, 王志强, 等. 5产区不同产地半夏主要化学组分含量测定及整体质量评价[J]. 天津中医药, 2020, 37(3): 332-337.
[7] 费改顺, 邱建国, 李茂星, 等. 野生半夏与栽培半夏总生物碱含量的比较[J]. 解放军药学学报, 2013, 29(5): 466. 7+70.
[8] 樊艳荣, 陈双林, 杨清平, 等. 毛竹林下多花黄精种群生长和生物量分配的立竹密度效应[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2013(2): 199-205.
[9] 谢其亮, 耿晓桐, 汪港, 等. 不同地区野生及栽培息半夏的品质特性分析[J]. 中医学报, 2021, 36(6): 1296-1302.
[10] 魏淑红. 不同栽培方式对半夏总生物碱含量的影响[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2008(5): 708-711.
[11] 孟衡玲, 张薇, 卢丙越, 等. 不同遮阴处理对半夏生长、产量和质量的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2016, 31(6): 1080-1084.
[12] 张跃进, 孟祥海, 杨东风, 等. 不同光照强度下半夏化学成分含量的比较研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究, 2009(5): 533-536.
[13] 韦庆翠, 黄心成, 王倩. 黑果腺肋花楸-半夏套种对土壤理化特性及养分的影响[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2022, 63(10): 10-12, 16.
[14] 韦庆翠, 张成霞, 王倩. 栽培措施对半夏性状品质及土壤微生态的影响研究[J]. 现代农村科技, 2024(9): 108-111.