数字身份退出管理:用户视角下账号退役与信息自决消除的决策机制
Digital Identity Exit Management: Decision Mechanisms for Account Retirement and Self-Determined Information Elimination from the User Perspective
DOI: 10.12677/hjdm.2026.164016, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 关 琳:江苏警官学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 数字身份;数字遗产;信息自决;Digital Identity; Digital Legacy; Information Self-Determination
摘要: 随着数字技术深度融入社会生活,个体在网络空间构建的数字身份已成为其人格与社会关系的重要载体。然而,当生命走向终点或用户决定退出网络时,这些数字身份的处置问题,即数字身份退出管理日益凸显。本文聚焦于用户视角,系统探讨了网络账号退役与信息自决消除的决策机制。首先,本文在梳理“数字身份终结”相关概念的基础上,构建了数字身份退出管理的理论框架,界定了其内涵与研究范畴。其次,本文深入剖析了现行法律规制与平台协议在信息自决消除授权与执行层面存在的困境,揭示了个人意愿、法律授权与商业利益之间的紧张关系。再次,本文从心理与行为维度,系统分析了影响用户进行账号退役与信息消除决策的关键因素,包括情感依恋、决策惰性等心理障碍,并初步探讨了跨文化背景下的意愿差异。进而,本文考察了从平台功能到标准化规范的技术实现路径,评估了现有技术手段的有效性与局限性。最后,本文在整合法律、心理、技术等多维因素的基础上,构建了一个以用户为中心的数字身份退出管理决策模型。
Abstract: As digital technologies become deeply integrated into social life, the digital identity constructed by individuals in cyberspace has become an important carrier of their personality and social relations. However, when life comes to an end or users decide to withdraw from the network, the disposition of these digital identities—namely, digital identity exit management—has become increasingly prominent. This paper focuses on the user perspective and systematically explores the decision-making mechanisms for online account retirement and self-determined information elimination. First, based on a review of concepts related to “digital identity termination”, this paper constructs a theoretical framework for digital identity exit management, defining its connotation and research scope. Second, it analyzes in depth the dilemmas existing in current legal regulations and platform agreements regarding the authorization and implementation of self-determined information elimination, revealing the tensions among individual will, legal authorization, and commercial interests. Third, from psychological and behavioral dimensions, it systematically examines key factors affecting users’ decisions to retire accounts and eliminate information, including emotional attachment, decision inertia, and other psychological barriers, and preliminarily discusses cross-cultural differences in willingness. Furthermore, it investigates the technical implementation pathways from platform functions to standardized norms, assessing the effectiveness and limitations of existing technical means. Finally, on the basis of integrating legal, psychological, and technical factors, it constructs a user-centered decision-making model for digital identity exit management.
文章引用:关琳. 数字身份退出管理:用户视角下账号退役与信息自决消除的决策机制[J]. 数据挖掘, 2026, 16(4): 177-187. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjdm.2026.164016

参考文献

[1] Marková, K. (2011) Digital Dying in Personal Information Management towards Thanatosensitive Information Management. Master’s Thesis, University of Porto.
[2] Harbinja, E. (2017) Legal Aspects of Transmission of Digital Assets on Death. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Strathclyde.
[3] Dinneen, J.D., Krtalić, M., Davoudi, N., Hellmich, H., Ochsner, C. and Bressel, P. (2024) Information Science and the Inevitable: A Literature Review at the Intersection of Death and Information Management: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) Paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75, 268-297.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24861
[4] Carroll, E. and Romano, J. (2010) Your Digital Afterlife: When Facebook, Flickr and Twitter Are Your Estate, What’s Your Legacy? New Riders.
[5] Harbinja, E. (2017) Post-Mortem Privacy 2.0: Theory, Law, and Technology. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 31, 26-42.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2017.1275116
[6] Massimi, M. and Baecker, R.M. (2010) A Death in the Family: Opportunities for Designing Technologies for the Bereaved. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, 10-15 April 2010, 1821-1830.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753600
[7] Massimi, M., Odom, W., Banks, R. and Kirk, D. (2011) Matters of Life and Death: Locating the End of Life in Lifespan-Oriented HCI Research. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, 7-12 May 2011, 987-996.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979090
[8] 张楠迪扬, 朱弋天. 数字身份: 形态类型、管理逻辑与发展趋势[J]. 北京行政学院学报, 2025(2): 46-58.
[9] 陆青. 数字身份的多元面向及其法律保护[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2022(6): 77-85.
[10] Hoskins, A. (2017) Digital Memory Studies: Media Pasts in Transition. Routledge, 147-167.
[11] Massimi, M. and Charise, A. (2009) Dying, Death, and Mortality. CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2459-2468.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520349
[12] Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data (General Data Protection Regulation).
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679
[13] 杨立新, 韩煦. 被遗忘权的中国本土化及法律适用[J]. 法律适用, 2015(2): 24-34.
[14] Buitelaar, J.C. (2017) Post-Mortem Privacy and Informational Self-Determination. Ethics and Information Technology, 19, 129-142.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9421-9
[15] Edwards, L. and Harbinja, E. (2013) Protecting Post-Mortem Privacy: Reconsidering the Privacy Interests of the Deceased in a Digital World. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 32, 83-130.
[16] 中华人民共和国民法典[EB/OL].
https://www.moj.gov.cn/pub/sfbgw/zwgkztzl/2026nianzhuanti/2026mfdxcy/2026mfdxcy_mfdqw/202605/t20260520_535295.html, 2026-07-25.
[17] 中华人民共和国个人信息保护法[EB/OL].
http://www.nmgfzb.cn/upload/xpaper/2021-11-16/4245-09_1.pdf#1#1, 2026-07-25.
[18] (2026) Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l’informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés.
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000886460/
[19] National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (2015) Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act (RUFADAA).
https://www.uniformlaws.org/committees/community-home?CommunityKey=f7237fc4-74c2-4728-81c6-b39a91ecdf22
[20] Hopkins, J.P. (2013) Afterlife in the Cloud: Managing a Digital Estate. Hastings Science and Technology Law Journal, 5, 209.
[21] 福建省厦门市思明区人民法院课题组. 互联网平台“围墙花园”行为的认定与裁判路径[J]. 法律适用, 2024(5): 3-13.
[22] Habib, H., Pearman, S., Wang, J., et al. (2020) “It’s a Scavenger Hunt”: Usability of Websites’ Opt-Out and Data Deletion Choices. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376511
[23] Habib, H., Zou, Y., Jannu, A., Sridhar, N., et al. (2019) An Empirical Analysis of Data Deletion and Opt-Out Choices on 150 Websites. Proceedings of the Fifteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security, Santa Clara, 12-13 August 2019, 387-406.
[24] Murillo, A., Kramm, A., Schnorf, S., et al. (2018) “If I Press Delete, It’s Gone”: User Understanding of Online Data Deletion and Expiration. Proceedings of the Fourteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security, Baltimore, 12-14 August 2018, 329-339.
[25] Norberg, P.A., Horne, D.R. and Horne, D.A. (2007) The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 41, 100-126.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.x
[26] Morse, T. and Birnhack, M. (2022) The Posthumous Privacy Paradox: Privacy Preferences and Behavior Regarding Digital Remains. New Media & Society, 24, 1343-1362.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820974955
[27] Bright, L.F., Kleiser, S.B. and Grau, S.L. (2015) Too Much Facebook? An Exploratory Examination of Social Media Fatigue. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 148-155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.048
[28] Polites, G.L. and Karahanna, E. (2012) Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 36, 21-42.
https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2012/36.1.02
[29] Georges, F. (2017) Digital Eternities. Post-Mortem Digital Identity from a Semio-Pragmatic Perspective. Alsic, 20, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.4000/alsic.3010
[30] Samuelson, W. and Zeckhauser, R. (1988) Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00055564
[31] Przybylski, A.K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C.R. and Gladwell, V. (2013) Motivational, Emotional, and Behavioral Correlates of Fear of Missing Out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1841-1848.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
[32] 韩伟. 数字来世: “与逝者交流”的人工智能技术及其伦理反思[J]. 东南学术, 2025(4): 84-95.
[33] Grimm, C. and Chiasson, S. (2014) Survey on the Fate of Digital Footprints after Death. Proceedings 2014 Workshop on Usable Security, San Diego, 23 February 2014, 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.14722/usec.2014.23049
[34] Brubaker, J.R., Hayes, G.R. and Dourish, P. (2013) Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning. The Information Society, 29, 152-163.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300
[35] Brubaker, J.R. and Hayes, G.R. (2011) “We Will Never Forget You [Online]”: An Empirical Investigation of Post-Mortem MySpace Comments. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, 19-23 March 2011, 123-132.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958843
[36] Geambasu, R., Kohno, T., Levy, A.A., et al. (2009) Vanish: Increasing Data Privacy with Self-Destructing Data. Proceedings of the 18th USENIX Security Symposium, Montreal, 10-14 August 2009, 299-316.
[37] Cavoukian, A. (2010) Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles.
https://www.thesedonaconference.org/sites/default/files/conference_papers/Recommended%20%5B08b%5D%20Privacy%20By%20Design_Cavoukian.pdf
[38] 国家市场监督管理总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 37964-2019信息安全技术 个人信息去标识化指南[S]. 北京: 国家标准化管理委员会, 2020-03-01.
https://openstd.samr.gov.cn/bzgk/std/newGbInfo?hcno=C8DF1BC2FB43C6EC0E602EB65EF0BC66
[39] (2025) Special Publication 800-88 Rev. 2: Guidelines for Media Sanitization.
https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/sp/800/88/r2/final
[40] (2024) ISO/IEC 27040:2024 Information Technology—Security Techniques—Storage Security.
https://www.iso.org/standard/80194.html
[41] (2012) DIN 66399 Büro-und Datentechnik—Vernichten von Datenträgern.
https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/din/din663992012de
[42] 卢鑫欣, 李志刚, 符隆文. 中国临终医疗自主决策权再审视[J]. 医学与哲学, 2026, 47(2): 41-46.
[43] Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
[44] Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[45] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[46] Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. 5th Edition, Free Press.
[47] Bélanger, F. and Crossler, R.E. (2011) Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1. MIS Quarterly, 35, 1017-1036.
https://doi.org/10.2307/41409971