生成式人工智能对高校文科教育的挑战与应对策略研究
Research on the Challenges and Coping Strategies of Generative AI to Liberal Arts Education in Colleges and Universities
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.16102251, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 郭 浩, 李辰彬, 朱红烨:广东海洋大学法政学院,广东 湛江
关键词: 生成式人工智能;高校;文科教育;Generative AI; Universities; Liberal Arts Education
摘要: 随着DeepSeek等生成式人工智能技术迅猛发展,高校文科教育面临前所未有的挑战与机遇。本文采用实验法、问卷调查法与文本分析法,构建“教–学”双维度分析框架,研究发现:生成式人工智能使得高校文科教师面临教学理念转型困难、人机协同边界模糊及评价体系异化等困境,学生则陷入知识繁杂筛选困境、技术依赖与创新弱化、技术非善与伦理淡薄。本文提出构建融合发展的治理与支持体系,培育以“人”为中心的数智素养,提升师生协同进化的核心能力,强调文科需在技术赋能中坚守人文关怀,实现技术赋能与学科价值坚守的动态平衡。
Abstract: With the rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as DeepSeek, liberal arts education in colleges and universities is facing unprecedented challenges and opportunities. Adopting experimental method, questionnaire survey method and text analysis method, this study constructs a dual-dimensional analytical framework of “teaching-learning”. The research finds that generative AI has brought dilemmas to liberal arts teachers in colleges and universities, including difficulties in transforming teaching concepts, vague boundaries of human-machine collaboration, and alienation of evaluation systems. For students, they are trapped in the dilemma of screening massive knowledge, technical dependence with weakened innovation, and lack of technical benevolence and ethical awareness. This study proposes to construct an integrated governance and support system, cultivate human-centered digital intelligence literacy, and enhance the core ability of collaborative evolution between teachers and students. It emphasizes that liberal arts should adhere to humanistic care in the process of technological empowerment, so as to achieve a dynamic balance between technological empowerment and the adherence to disciplinary values.
文章引用:郭浩, 李辰彬, 朱红烨. 生成式人工智能对高校文科教育的挑战与应对策略研究[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(10): 1472-1482. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.16102251

参考文献

[1] Mollick, E.R. (2023) Using AI to Implement Expressive Interest in Education. SSRN.
[2] Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023) ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
[3] Baidoo-Anu, D. and Ansah, L.O. (2023) Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI, 7, 52-62.
[4] Bender, E.M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. and Shmitchell, S. (2021) On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Online, 3-10 March 2021, 610-623.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
[5] 焦建利, 陈丽, 吴伟伟. 由ChatGPT引发的教育之问: 可能影响与应对之策[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2023, 29(3): 19-32.
[6] Sullivan, M., Kelly, A. and Mclaughlin, P. (2023) ChatGPT in Higher Education: Considerations for Academic Integrity and Student Learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6, 31-40.
[7] UNESCO (2023) ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Quick Start Guide.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
[8] 周洪宇, 常顺利. 生成式人工智能嵌入高等教育的未来图景、潜在风险及其治理[J]. 现代教育管理, 2023(11): 1-12.
[9] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2017) Attention Is All You Need. In: Guyon, I., et al., Ed., Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Curran Associates Inc., 6000-6010.
[10] 令小雄, 王鼎民, 袁健. ChatGPT爆火后关于科技伦理及学术伦理的冷思考[J]. 新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 44(4): 123-136.
[11] 焦建利. 学生和教师AI使用中的差异[J]. 中国信息技术教育, 2023(23): 14.
[12] 刘盛. 美国一流大学在教育教学实践中应用ChatGPT的划界及其启示[J]. 高等教育研究, 2023, 44(10): 89-98.
[13] Bala, K., Colvin, A., Christiansen, M.H., et al. (2023) Generative Artificial Intelligence for Education and Pedagogy. Cornell University, 1-35.
[14] 钱大军, 苏杭. “互构”中的教育与技术: 高等教育应当如何回应人工智能[J]. 教育发展研究, 2021, 41(7): 68-76.
[15] 李焕宏, 薛澜. 生成式人工智能应用的使能型风险规制——以高等教育应用为例[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2025, 46(1): 68-78.
[16] 褚如心. 生成式人工智能赋能高等教育发展的应用、风险及破解之道[J]. 青年学报, 2024(4): 60-66.
[17] Sudmann, A., Echterhölter, A., Ramsauer, M., et al. (2023) Beyond Quantity: Research with Subsymbolic AI. Transcript Verlag, 45.
[18] 金国峰, 潘英杰. 论生成式人工智能、高等教育与人的有机统一[J]. 煤炭高等教育, 2024, 42(3): 8-15.
[19] Cooper, G. (2023) Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444-452.
[20] 管其平. 智能社会学: 智能时代社会学研究新方向[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022(3): 1-9.
[21] 曹莹. 算法支配下新业态从业者的生存之困与化解方法[J]. 决策与信息, 2025(2): 42-52.
[22] 李思琦, 张志朋, 赵文文, 等. 算法控制视域下零工工作者社会偏差行为形成机理研究[J]. 管理现代化, 2024(6): 96-104.
[23] 范晓光. 数字化与实证社会学研究方法困境化解[J]. 中国社会科学评价, 2020(3): 66-75, 159.
[24] 李梦甲, 郑延谱. 生成式人工智能产业浪潮下法学教育面临的挑战与应对策略[J]. 西部素质教育, 2025, 11(6): 141-144.
[25] 金华, 张彭菲, 尹洪骁. AIGC视域下高校文科教育的功能提升、风险评估与治理变革[J]. 中北大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(6): 33-41.
[26] 陈曦. AIGC赋能教师教学创新: 路径、挑战和展望[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2025, 39(1): 16-22.
[27] 黄少华. 人工智能与智能社会学[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2019(5): 56-62.
[28] Chatterjee, J. and Dethlefs, N. (2023) This New Conversational AI Model Can Be Your Friend, Philosopher, and Guide ... and Even Your Worst Enemy. Patterns, 4, Article 100676.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100676
[29] 郭元祥. 实践缺失是我国基础教育的根本局限[J]. 教育研究与实验, 2014(3): 1-8.
[30] 曾点. 人工智能能替代科学家吗?——再思STS的一场论战[J]. 哲学分析, 2023, 14(1): 159-171.
[31] 林曦. 人工智能“幻觉”的存在主义阐释[J]. 社会科学辑刊, 2025(2): 81-91.
[32] 邱泽奇. 数字化与社会学的时代之变化[J]. 中国社会科学评价, 2020(2): 64-76.
[33] 张宁, 高鹏程. 生成式人工智能情感模拟的伦理风险与治理路径: 基于技术-社会互构理论框架的分析[J]. 科学决策, 2025(2): 123-134.
[34] 蒋贵友, 殷文轩. 全球高等教育数字治理碎片化困境及其战略应对[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 26(2): 102-110.
[35] 陈宇昕, 吴杨义. 生成式人工智能引发的异化现象及破解对策[J]. 海南开放大学学报, 2025, 26(1): 69-75.
[36] Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008