从单光谱到多源融合:煤质快速检测技术发展综述
From Single-Spectral to Multi-Source Fusion: A Review of the Development of Rapid Coal Quality Detection Technology
DOI: 10.12677/aepe.2026.145026, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 田 浩*, 张 磊#, 郭晓虎, 包 军:杭州华电双冠能源科技有限公司,浙江 杭州;王光普:华电电力科学研究院有限公司,浙江 杭州
关键词: 煤质快速检测;多源融合;光谱分析;融合策略;工业应用;Rapid Coal Quality Detection; Multi-Source Fusion; Spectral Analysis; Fusion Strategy; Industrial Application
摘要: 煤质快速检测对燃煤电厂的经济效益、设备安全与环保水平具有重要意义,传统检测方法耗时长、数据滞后,单一光谱技术又各有局限,本文旨在系统梳理煤质快速检测技术从单光谱到多源融合的发展脉络,明确技术现状与瓶颈。本文综述了瞬发伽马中子活化分析(PGNAA)、激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)、X射线荧光光谱(XRF)、近红外光谱(NIRS)及拉曼光谱等主流单光谱技术的原理、研究进展与固有缺陷,并归纳了多源融合在数据级、特征级与决策级三个层面的融合策略及代表性工作。分析表明,单一技术难以兼顾全指标、高精度与无辐射风险;多源融合通过信息互补可有效提升检测全面性与精度,但当前多数研究仍处于实验室阶段,在数据异质性、模型泛化能力、长期运行稳定性及可解释性方面面临共性挑战。多源融合是煤质快检的重要发展方向,未来需在样品前处理、信号处理与智能控制等方面持续突破,以推动大规模工业应用。
Abstract: Rapid coal quality detection is of great significance to the economic benefits, equipment safety and environmental protection of coal-fired power plants. Traditional detection methods are time-consuming with delayed data, while single-spectroscopy techniques each have limitations. This paper aims to systematically review the development of coal quality rapid detection technology from single spectroscopy to multi-source fusion, and to clarify the current status and bottlenecks. This paper reviews the principles, research progress and inherent defects of mainstream single-spectroscopy techniques, including prompt gamma neutron activation analysis (PGNAA), laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and Raman spectroscopy. The fusion strategies and representative works of multi-source fusion at data-level, feature-level and decision-level are also summarized. The analysis shows that a single technique cannot simultaneously achieve full-index detection, high accuracy and no radiation risk. Multi-source fusion can effectively improve detection comprehensiveness and accuracy through information complementarity. However, most current studies remain at the laboratory stage and face common challenges such as data heterogeneity, model generalization ability, long-term operational stability and interpretability. Multi-source fusion is an important direction for rapid coal quality detection. Future breakthroughs in sample preparation, signal processing and intelligent control are needed to promote large-scale industrial application.
文章引用:田浩, 张磊, 王光普, 郭晓虎, 包军. 从单光谱到多源融合:煤质快速检测技术发展综述[J]. 电力与能源进展, 2026, 14(5): 252-261. https://doi.org/10.12677/aepe.2026.145026

参考文献

[1] 王洪磊, 郭鑫, 张亦凡, 等. 煤质煤量全面在线检测技术发展现状及应用进展 [J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2024, 52(2): 219-237.
[2] 孙健, 王化阳. 煤炭在线检测技术研究与应用现状[J]. 煤炭加工与综合利用, 2025(8): 69-74+79.
[3] 冯晓涵, 杜明生, 崔柳, 等. 煤质快速检测分析技术发展与应用[J]. 煤炭加工与综合利用, 2025(8): 116-122.
[4] 侯宗余, 宋惟然, 宋玉洲, 等. 激光诱导击穿光谱煤质在线分析技术现状与展望[J]. 煤质技术, 2023, 38(1): 1-12.
[5] Sheta, S., Afgan, M.S., Hou, Z., Yao, S., Zhang, L., Li, Z., et al. (2019) Coal Analysis by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: A Tutorial Review. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 34, 1047-1082.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ja00016j
[6] 倪明辉, 李燕, 易镇鑫, 等. 激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)在煤质检测中的应用现状[J]. 中国无机分析化学, 2022, 12(4): 80-88.
[7] Liu, K., He, C., Zhu, C., Chen, J., Zhan, K. and Li, X. (2021) A Review of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Coal Analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 143, Article 116357.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2021.116357
[8] 郭凯. 快速分析技术在煤质检测中的应用[J]. 山西化工, 2023, 43(1): 138-139+142.
[9] Revenko, A.G. and Pashkova, G.V. (2024) Study of the Chemical Composition of Coal and Coal Ash by X‐Ray Fluorescence Method: A Review. X-Ray Spectrometry, 54, 159-170.
https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.3444.
[10] 于鹏峰, 苏攀, 刘佳薇, 等. 基于PL-Raman光谱分析的煤质快速检测方法[J]. 动力工程学报, 2022, 42(3): 215-220.
[11] 程南南, 石梦岩, 侯泉林, 等. 拉曼光谱在煤大分子结构表征中的应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(3): 1311-1324.
[12] 李雪萍, 曾强. 光谱分析在煤结构研究中的进展[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2022, 42(2): 350-357.
[13] 田军. 多谱数据驱动的煤质智能分析方法研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2025.
[14] 尹嘉鑫. NIRS-XRF煤炭质检中多模态粒度校正方法研究及工业控制策略优化[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 太原: 山西大学, 2025.
[15] 中国矿业大学(北京), 国电环境保护研究院有限公司. 基于多维度数据融合的近红外煤质检测方法[P]. 中国专利, CN119903475A. 2025-04-29.
[16] Tian, Z., Li, X., Wang, G., Zhang, L., Li, J., Wang, S., et al. (2022) Elemental and Proximate Analysis of Coal by X-Ray Fluorescence Assisted Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. Plasma Science and Technology, 24, Article 084007.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-6272/ac78ca
[17] Ma, W., Li, C., Yang, Q., Qin, H., Lu, Z. and Yao, S. (2026) Chemically Informed Targeted Multiblock Data Fusion for Coal Analysis Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry, 98, 16282-16295.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6c00824
[18] 茌方, 王庆松, 李承峻, 等. 基于LIBS和NIRS信号同步采集和融合的入炉煤发热量测量研究[J]. 热力发电, 2023, 52(7): 92-98.
[19] 田志辉, 王树青, 张雷, 等. LIBS-XRF联用多光谱煤质分析仪的研制与应用(特邀) [J]. 光子学报, 2023, 52(3): 144-155.
[20] Wang, S., Cao, S., Li, S., Zhu, Y., Lin, M., Chang, J., et al. (2026) Advances in Rapid Spectroscopic Methods for Coal Analysis: Principles, Key Techniques, and Emerging Measurement Challenges. Measurement, 259, Article 119493.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.119493
[21] Yao, S., Qin, H., Wang, Q., Lu, Z., Yao, X., Yu, Z., et al. (2020) Optimizing Analysis of Coal Property Using Laser-Induced Breakdown and Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopies. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 239, Article 118492.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2020.118492