高校英语课程思政“双文化融合”教学模式的构建与实践研究
A Study on the Construction and Practice of the “Bicultural Integration” Teaching Model for Ideological and Political Education in College English Courses
摘要: 新时代高校外语教育面临人才培养目标的转型升级,高校英语课程不仅要完成语言技能训练,更要承担传播中华优秀文化、培育学生文化主体意识与文化认同的育人使命。当前高校英语教学普遍存在西方文化占据主导地位、本土文化呈现符号化碎片化、重输入轻输出、课程思政融入流于表面等现实困境。本文提出高校英语课程思政“双文化融合”理念,坚持中西方文化平等互鉴,构建“西方文化输入–中西方文化对比–中国文化输出”的闭环教学范式,区分本科大学英语与研究生学术英语写作不同学段能力目标,搭建“基础层–发展层–对比层”三维教学内容体系与“四维一体”教学评价体系。依托河南工业大学教学改革实践开展行动研究,结果表明“双文化融合”模式能够有效提升学生语言应用能力、跨文化思辨素养与文化认同,可为地方高校英语课程思政改革提供可复制的实践方案。
Abstract: In the new era, foreign language education in Chinese colleges and universities is confronted with the transformation and upgrading of talent cultivation objectives. College English courses are expected not only to deliver language skills training but also to undertake the educational mission of disseminating fine Chinese culture and cultivating students’ cultural subject consciousness and cultural identity. Currently, college English teaching generally faces practical challenges such as the dominance of Western cultural content, the symbolic and fragmented presentation of local culture, an overemphasis on input over output, and superficial integration of ideological and political education. This paper proposes the concept of “bicultural integration” for ideological and political education in college English, adhering to equal mutual learning between Chinese and Western cultures. It constructs a closed-loop teaching paradigm of “Western cultural input - comparative analysis of Chinese and Western cultures - Chinese cultural output”, distinguishes ability objectives for undergraduate College English and graduate Academic English Writing, and establishes a three-dimensional teaching content system comprising “foundation, development, and comparison” levels, along with a “four-in-one” teaching evaluation system. Drawing on the teaching reform practice at Henan University of Technology, an action research study was conducted. The findings indicate that the “Bicultural Integration” model can effectively enhance students’ language application competence, intercultural critical thinking literacy, and cultural identity, and can provide a replicable practical framework for curriculum-based ideological and political education reform in English courses at local higher education institutions.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
孙有中. 外语教育与跨文化能力培养[J]. 中国外语, 2016, 13(3): 1, 17-22.
|
|
[2]
|
教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL]. 2020-05-28. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-06/06/content_5517606.htm, 2026-08-26.
|
|
[3]
|
教育部高等学校大学外语教学指导委员会. 大学英语教学指南(2020版) [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2020.
|
|
[4]
|
苏燕. 高校英语教学中本土文化缺失缘由与对策[J]. 开封教育学院学报, 2014, 34(6): 117-118.
|
|
[5]
|
邹丽玲, 王惠敏. 跨文化教育视角下大学英语课程思政建设路径探究[J]. 高教学刊, 2024, 10(28): 176-179.
|
|
[6]
|
Byram, M. (1997) Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. Multilingual Matters.
|
|
[7]
|
胡洋, 李和润. 跨文化交际能力培养融入大学英语课堂的路径与实践[J]. 教育创新与实践, 2026, 2(1): 1-4.
|
|
[8]
|
文秋芳. 构建“产出导向法”理论体系[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2015, 47(4): 547-558, 640.
|
|
[9]
|
黎畅. 论课程思政背景下大学英语批判性思维能力培养研究[J]. 海外英语, 2024(11): 125-127.
|
|
[10]
|
盖丽娜, 张泓金利, 唐墨. 文化自信视域下大学英语课程思政建设研究[J]. 海外英语, 2022(3): 196-198.
|
|
[11]
|
韩佶颖, 李雨纯, 薛琳, 等. 课程思政驱动下高校外语教师情绪与身份转变研究[J]. 现代外语, 2026, 49(2): 252-263.
|
|
[12]
|
胡婧. 文化自信视角下高校外语专业课程思政建设的策略[J]. 西部素质教育, 2022, 8(9): 38-40.
|
|
[13]
|
朱雪梅. 大学英语课程思政综合评价体系建设路径研究[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2026(13): 177-180.
|