智慧学习环境下高职课堂教学互动效果影响因素研究
Research on Influencing Factors of Classroom Teaching Interaction in Higher Vocational Colleges under Smart Learning Environment
DOI: 10.12677/ve.2026.1510445, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 唐春慧:阜阳幼儿师范高等专科学校健康和管理学院,安徽 阜阳
关键词: 智慧学习环境;高职教育;教学互动;影响因素;Smart Learning Environment; Higher Vocational Education; Classroom Teaching Interaction; Influencing Factors
摘要: 随着人工智能、大数据、物联网等新一代信息技术与高职教育的深度融合,智慧学习环境已成为推动职业教育数字化转型的重要载体,但教学互动效果不佳的问题依然突出。本研究以穆尔交互影响距离理论和协同教学理论为基础,将高职课堂中的教学互动分为师生、生生、师师以及资源四个维度,从教师特质、学生特质与环境维度三方面提取关键变量,进而采用文献分析法、深度访谈与问卷测量相结合的混合研究路径,系统探析智慧学习情境下教学互动效果的驱动因素。研究选取安徽省三所高职院校的8名教师进行访谈,286名学生参与问卷调查,经过德尔菲专家咨询和数据分析确定智慧学习环境下高职课堂教学互动效果影响因素。结果表明:教师特质、教学设计、信息技术应用能力、学习态度、社会临场感、技术支撑、智慧空间布局、学习氛围八个因素对教学互动具有显著正向影响,同伴压力和自主学习能力影响不显著。据此提出构建智能协同机制、优化教学互动策略、升级智慧学习环境的对策建议。
Abstract: With the deep integration of new-generation information technologies such as artificial intelligence, big data, and the Internet of Things into vocational education, smart learning environments have become an important driver for the digital transformation of vocational education, but the problem of poor teaching interaction remains prominent. This study, based on Moore’s theory of transactional distance and collaborative teaching theory, divides teaching interaction in vocational classrooms into four dimensions: teacher-student, student-student, teacher-teacher, and resources. It also extracts key variables from teacher traits, student traits, and the environmental dimension. Using a mixed research approach combining literature analysis, in-depth interviews, and questionnaire surveys, the study systematically explores the driving factors of teaching interaction effects in smart learning contexts. Eight teachers from three vocational colleges in Anhui Province were interviewed, and 286 students participated in the questionnaire survey. Through Delphi expert consultation and data analysis, the factors affecting teaching interaction in vocational classrooms under smart learning environments were identified. The results show that eight factors—teacher characteristics, instructional design, information technology application ability, learning attitude, social presence, technical support, smart space layout, and learning atmosphere—have a significant positive impact on teaching interaction, while peer pressure and self-directed learning ability are not significant. Based on this, suggestions are made to build intelligent collaboration mechanisms, optimize teaching interaction strategies, and upgrade smart learning environments.
文章引用:唐春慧. 智慧学习环境下高职课堂教学互动效果影响因素研究[J]. 职业教育发展, 2026, 15(10): 333-343. https://doi.org/10.12677/ve.2026.1510445

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 中国智慧教育白皮书[R/OL]. 北京: 中华人民共和国教育部, 2025.
https://itc.zcmu.edu.cn/20250618.pdf, 2026-08-17.
[2] 教育部关于印发《教育信息化2.0行动计划》的通知[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.html, 2018-04-13.
[3] 教育部等九部门关于印发《职业教育提质培优行动计划(2020—2023年)》的通知[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-09/29/content_5548106.htm, 2020-09-16.
[4] 黄荣怀, 刘德建, 刘晓琳, 等. 互联网促进教育变革的基本格局[J]. 中国电化教育, 2017(1): 7-16.
[5] 王陆. 信息化教育研究中的新内容: 互动关系研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2008(1): 11-17, 21.
[6] 王晓晨, 江邵阳, 黄荣怀. 面向智慧教室的中小学课堂互动观察工具研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2015, 36(9): 49-53.
[7] 祝智庭, 胡姣. 教育数字化转型的本质探析与研究展望[J]. 中国电化教育, 2022(4): 1-8+25.
[8] 顾小清, 王炜. 支持教师专业发展的课堂分析技术新探索[J]. 中国电化教育, 2004(7): 18-21.
[9] Moore, M.G. (1993) Theory of Transactional Distance. In: Keegan, D., Ed., Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, Routledge, 22-38.
[10] 吉标, 陈庆新. 协同教学的历史、进展与启示[J]. 课程∙教材∙教法, 2021, 41(1): 57-63.
[11] 张伟平, 陈梦婷, 赵晓娜, 等. 专递课堂中师生互动对课堂学习效果的影响——以崇阳县小学美术专递课堂为例[J]. 电化教育研究, 2020, 41(8): 90-96.
[12] 陈丽. 远程教学中交互规律的研究现状述评[J]. 中国远程教育, 2004(1): 13-20, 78.