数据要素驱动农业企业新质生产力发展——理论机制与实证检验
Data Elements Driving the Development of New Quality Productivity in Agricultural Enterprises—Theoretical Mechanisms and Empirical Tests
摘要: 在数字经济与农业现代化深度融合的背景下,如何破解农业生产“靠天吃饭”的资源约束,培育新质生产力,成为农业强国建设的关键议题。作为新型生产要素,数据被视为优化农业价值链的核心引擎,但其微观驱动机制及边界条件尚不明晰。基于此,本文以2012~2024年沪深A股农业上市企业为样本,构建“数据要素–企业动态能力–新质生产力”框架,从信息不对称缓解、生物性资产管理优化、自然风险抵御增强三条路径阐释其驱动机制,实证检验数据要素的驱动效应及其作用机理。研究发现:(1) 数据要素应用显著促进了农业企业新质生产力提升,该效应经多重稳健性检验依然成立;(2) 动态能力在这一过程中发挥了部分中介作用,揭示了其转化路径;(3) 企业ESG表现正向调节数据要素的驱动效应,高ESG表现企业的数据边际生产力提升50%以上;(4) 异质性分析表明,数据要素驱动作用在非国有企业和h核心农业生产领域更为显著,其中畜牧业驱动效应尤为突出,种植业因生产周期长且当前样本规模有限,效应尚不显著。本文为农业数字化政策设计和企业数据战略制定提供了微观实证依据。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the deep integration of digital economy and agricultural modernization, addressing the resource constraints arising from agriculture’s reliance on weather and cultivating new quality productive forces (NQPF) has emerged as a central challenge in China’s pursuit of agricultural strength. As a novel factor of production, data is regarded as the core engine for optimizing the agricultural value chain; however, its micro-level driving mechanisms and boundary conditions remain underexplored. Drawing on data from agricultural listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets over the period 2012~2024, this study constructs a theoretical framework linking “data elements - enterprise dynamic capabilities - new quality productive forces.” It elucidates three specific driving pathways—reducing information asymmetry, optimizing biological asset management, and enhancing resilience against natural risks—and empirically tests the driving effect of data elements and its underlying mechanisms. The findings reveal that: (1) Data element application significantly promotes the development of NQPF in agricultural enterprises, and this effect remains valid after multiple robustness checks; (2) Enterprise dynamic capability plays a partial mediating role, revealing its transformation pathway; (3) ESG performance positively moderates this promoting effect, with the marginal productivity of data increasing by more than 50% in enterprises with high ESG performance; (4) The driving effect is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and core agricultural production sectors. Notably, the effect is particularly strong in the livestock industry, whereas the effect in the crop farming sector is not statistically significant, likely due to longer production cycles and limited sample size among listed companies. These findings offer micro-level empirical evidence for agricultural digitalization policy design and enterprise data strategy formulation.
文章引用:何奕淳, 张宸, 伍希睿. 数据要素驱动农业企业新质生产力发展——理论机制与实证检验[J]. 商业全球化, 2026, 14(4): 362-377. https://doi.org/10.12677/bglo.2026.144035

参考文献

[1] 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议[N]. 人民日报, 2025-10-29(1).
[2] 于凤霞. 加快形成新质生产力 构筑国家竞争新优势[J]. 新经济导刊, 2023(9): 20-28.
[3] 陈刚, 颜斌斌, 汤珂. 数据的要素化与资产化: 理论辨析与实践探索[J]. 国际经济评论, 2024(5): 153-176+8.
[4] 马淑琴, 徐苗, 张陈宇. 数据要素应用与企业创新效应——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2024(2): 50-67.
[5] 戴魁早, 黄姿, 梁银笛. 数据要素与服务型制造发展[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(12): 95-112.
[6] 朱月晨, 韩小威. 新质生产力赋能农业企业创新发展的体系构建与实践路径[J]. 农业经济, 2025(3): 90-92.
[7] 郑安邦, 冯华. 数据要素驱动经济增长的乘数效应和溢出效应[J]. 当代财经, 2026(6): 31-44.
[8] 王乐君, 寇广增. 促进农村一二三产业融合发展的若干思考[J]. 农业经济问题, 2017(6): 82-88.
[9] 杜建军, 朱尧, 张军伟. 数字经济赋能与农业智慧化: 理论机理、创新模式与政策体系[J]. 经济地理, 2026, 46(1): 193-203.
[10] 朱迪, 叶林祥. 中国农业新质生产力: 水平测度与动态演变[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(9): 24-30.
[11] 傅联英, 蔡煜. 中国市域新质生产力: 时序演变、组群特征与发展策略[J]. 产业经济评论, 2024(4): 5-22.
[12] 周文, 许凌云. 论新质生产力: 内涵特征与重要着力点[J]. 改革, 2023(10): 1-13.
[13] 罗必良. 论农业新质生产力[J]. 改革, 2024(4): 19-30.
[14] 温涛, 陈一明. 数字经济与农业农村经济融合发展: 实践模式、现实障碍与突破路径[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020(7): 118-129.
[15] Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997) Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
[16] Barney, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[17] Ciasullo, M.V., Ferrara, M. and Lim, W.M. (2025) Dynamic Capabilities and Data-Driven Culture for Digital Transformation: Evidence from Agri-Food SMEs. British Food Journal, 128, 3377-3393.
https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2025-0119
[18] 何中伟. 基于动态能力多重观点整合视角的企业大数据能力概念内涵、层级结构与构成要素研究[J]. 现代工业经济和信息化, 2023, 13(11): 61-69.
[19] 王墨林, 宋渊洋, 阎海峰, 等. 数字化转型对企业国际化广度的影响研究: 动态能力的中介作用[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2022, 44(5): 33-47.
[20] Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2014) The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60, 2835-2857.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
[21] Porter, M.E. and Linde, C.v.d. (1995) Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 97-118.
https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
[22] Friede, G., Busch, T. and Bassen, A. (2015) ESG and Financial Performance: Aggregated Evidence from More than 2000 Empirical Studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5, 210-233.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
[23] 高杰英, 褚冬晓, 廉永辉, 等. ESG表现能改善企业投资效率吗? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(11): 24-34+72.
[24] Guo, Y., Hu, J., Dou, Y. and Lin, S. (2025) Can ESG Rating Help Shape Enterprises’ New-Quality Productivity? Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 104, Article ID: 104654.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104654
[25] 胡鞍钢, 吴群刚. 农业企业化: 中国农村现代化的重要途径[J]. 农业经济问题, 2001(1): 9-21.
[26] 龚斌磊, 袁菱苒. 新质生产力视角下的农业全要素生产率: 理论、测度与实证[J]. 农业经济问题, 2024(4): 68-80.
[27] 丁璐扬, 李华晶. 商业模式创新赋能农业企业新质生产力发展: 理论机制与实证检验[J]. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 24(2): 50-61.
[28] 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144+10.
[29] 赵凤, 王铁男, 王宇. 开放式创新中的外部技术获取与产品多元化: 动态能力的调节作用研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(6): 76-85+99.
[30] 温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 中介效应分析: 方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.