基于注意力机制的TCN-LSTM的页岩气产量递减动态预测研究
Research on Dynamic Prediction of Shale Gas Production Decline Based on an Attention-Based TCN-LSTM
摘要: 针对传统递减曲线模型在复杂生产动态刻画方面的局限,以及常规机器学习方法对样本规模依赖较强、中长期外推能力不足的问题,本文构建了融合时间卷积网络(TCN)、长短时记忆网络(LSTM)与注意力机制的ATT-TCN-LSTM页岩气产量预测模型。首先对油嘴调整、气举等生产制度造成的异常产量进行校正,并采用小样本微量扰动方式扩充数据集;随后结合随机森林与主成分分析(PCA)识别并降维地质、工程主控参数;在此基础上,采用AdamW优化器和余弦退火学习率完成模型训练,并利用MSE、MAE和MAPE评价预测效果。结果表明,ATT-TCN-LSTM能够较好刻画页岩气井全生产周期的产量变化,在拟合精度和中长期预测能力方面均优于基础LSTM和TCN-LSTM模型。研究形成的主控因素分析与时序预测方法可为页岩气单井动态配产和压裂参数优化提供参考。
Abstract: In response to the limitations of traditional decline curve models in characterizing complex production dynamics, as well as the strong dependence of conventional machine learning methods on sample size and insufficient ability to extrapolate in the medium to long term, this paper constructs an ATT-TCN-LSTM shale gas production prediction model that integrates temporal convolutional networks (TCN), long short-term memory networks (LSTM), and attention mechanisms. Firstly, the abnormal production caused by production regimes such as nozzle adjustment and gas lift is corrected, and the dataset is expanded using small sample micro disturbance method; Subsequently, random forest and principal component analysis (PCA) are combined to identify and reduce the dimensionality of geological and engineering control parameters; On this basis, the model was trained using the AdamW optimizer and cosine annealing learning rate, and the prediction performance is evaluated using MSE, MAE, and MAPE. The results show that ATT-TCN-LSTM can better characterize the production variations of shale gas wells throughout the entire production cycle, and is superior to the basic LSTM and TCN-LSTM models in terms of fitting accuracy and medium- to long-term prediction ability. The main controlling factor analysis and time series prediction methods developed in this study can provide reference for the dynamic production allocation and fracturing parameter optimization of single shale gas wells.
文章引用:吴欣雨, 吴俊豪, 陈志愿, 刘鸿宇. 基于注意力机制的TCN-LSTM的页岩气产量递减动态预测研究[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(10): 1461-1472. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.1610129

参考文献

[1] 宋建贵, 李红. 页岩气地质特征及产能影响因素分析[J]. 内蒙古煤炭经济, 2021(1): 213-214.
[2] 黄华. 涪陵页岩气田水平井测试产量的地质控制因素探讨[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2023, 37(4): 405-441.
[3] 朱良. 页岩气地质特征及其产能影响因素分析[J]. 化工设计通讯, 2016, 42(4): 256.
[4] 张廷山, 陈雷, 梁兴, 等. 昭通国家级页岩气示范区五峰组——龙马溪组页岩气富集地质主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(4): 93-102.
[5] 李庆辉, 陈勉, Fred P·Wang, 等. 工程因素对页岩气产量的影响——以北美Haynesville页岩气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(4): 54-59+123.
[6] 刘历历. 渝西区块深层页岩气体积压裂工艺参数优化[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 重庆科技学院, 2023.
[7] 洪亚飞, 王建忠, 孙强. 焦石坝页岩气储层产能影响因素分析[J]. 非常规油气, 2016, 3(5): 73-78.
[8] 徐小明, 周明, 熊巍, 等. 页岩气产能影响因素分析[J]. 石油化工应用, 2013, 32(9): 10-12+17.
[9] 万成祥. 海相页岩自封闭机理及控制因素——以四川盆地龙马溪组为例[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国石油大学, 2023.
[10] 王乾宇, 吴飞鹏, 孙秋分, 等. 页岩气产能预测方法的优选与评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(4): 559-565+578.
[11] 游妙妍. 页岩气藏产能影响因素综合研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2024.
[12] 李成威. 页岩气压裂井产能预测新方法[J]. 辽宁化工, 2021, 50(7): 1005-1008+1014.
[13] 于希宁, 牛成林, 李建强. 基于决策树和专家系统的短期电力负荷预测系统[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 32(5): 57-61.
[14] 王欣, 尹留志, 方兆本. 股票价格成份指数编制方法研究[J]. 预测, 2009, 28(3): 57-60+64.
[15] Breiman, L. (2001) Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010933404324
[16] 杜续, 冯景瑜, 吕少卿, 等. 基于随机森林回归分析的PM2.5浓度预测模型[J]. 电信科学, 2017, 33(7): 66-75.
[17] 纪磊, 李菊花, 肖佳林. 随机森林算法在页岩气田多段压裂改造中的应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2020, 39(6): 168-174.