知识图谱教育应用的结构性错位与认知转向
Structural Misalignment and Cognitive Turn in Educational Applications of Knowledge Graphs
摘要: 知识图谱正成为教育数字化基础设施的重要组成部分,在智能教学系统中的应用日益广泛。然而,当前研究过度聚焦于知识抽取算法、推荐准确率等技术指标优化,忽视了知识图谱作用于教与学的深层逻辑,导致“技术可行、落地困难”的普遍困境。本文采用理论分析方法,揭示这一困境的根源在于“知识工程逻辑”与“学习认知逻辑”的结构性错位,其本质是教学目标、认知规律与学习路径三重建模的缺失。基于此诊断,提出破解路径:从“学科知识图谱”走向“学生学科认知图谱”,以学科核心素养发展为目标,融合认知诊断模型与学习轨迹分析,将静态知识库转变为动态认知导航,实现从“技术可用”到“教育可用”的转变。
Abstract: Knowledge graphs are becoming an important part of the digital infrastructure of education and are increasingly being used in intelligent tutoring systems. However, current research has overemphasized the optimization of technical indicators such as knowledge extraction algorithms and recommendation accuracy, while neglecting the deeper logic of how knowledge graphs function in teaching and learning, resulting in a widespread dilemma of “technically feasible but difficult to implement”. Adopting a theoretical analysis approach, this paper reveals that the root cause of this dilemma lies in a structural misalignment between the “knowledge engineering logic” and the “learning-cognitive logic”, which essentially manifests as the absence of three levels of modeling: instructional objectives, cognitive laws, and learning paths. Based on this diagnosis, this paper proposes a pathway to address this dilemma: shifting from “subject knowledge graphs” to “student subject cognitive graphs”, with the goal of developing subject core competencies. By integrating cognitive diagnosis models with learning trajectory analysis, static knowledge repositories are transformed into dynamic cognitive navigators, enabling a transition from “technologically usable” to “educationally applicable”.
文章引用:杨妍梅, 韦玉荣, 张宏, 王金柱, 黄小然, 刘小满. 知识图谱教育应用的结构性错位与认知转向[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(10): 1629-1638. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.16102269

参考文献

[1] 周东岱, 董晓晓, 顾恒年. 教育领域知识图谱研究新趋向: 学科教学图谱[J]. 电化教育研究, 2024, 45(2): 91-97, 120.
[2] Gorbunova, A., Kapuza, A., Chen, O. and Costley, J. (2025) Rethinking Pre-Training: Cognitive Load Implications for Learners with Varying Prior Knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article ID: 1628047.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1628047
[3] Taber, K.S. (2024) Educational Constructivism. Encyclopedia, 4, 1534-1552.
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/4/4/100
[4] 张建伟, 陈琦. 简论建构性学习和教学[J]. 教育研究, 1999(5): 56-60.
[5] 郑庆华, 龚铁梁, 刘欢. 大数据知识工程: 实现智能化的必由之路[J]. 中国计算机学会通讯, 2023, 19(7): 8-9.
[6] 吴杨, 吕钰琪, 杜钧, 等. 知识图谱驱动智能学习的内生逻辑[J]. 中国电化教育, 2025(2): 122-130.
[7] Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., et al. (2015) Deep Knowledge Tracing. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28. Curran Associates, Montreal, 505-513.
[8] 孙伟. 基于知识图谱的图神经网络推荐[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2022.
[9] 章建跃. 树立课程意识落实核心素养[J]. 数学通报, 2016, 55(5): 1-4.
[10] 关于政协第十三届全国委员会第四次会议第3164号(教育类203号)提案答复的函[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/xxgk_jyta/jyta_jiaocaiju/202107/t20210721_545963.html, 2026-10-19.
[11] 董晓晓, 周东岱, 顾恒年. 面向学科核心素养发展的学生学科认知图谱构建研究[J]. 电化教育研究, 2023, 44(6): 90-96+103.
[12] Li, A., Li, Y. and Gao, X. (2026) Personalized Learning Path Recommendation Based on Knowledge Graphs: A Survey. Electronics, 15, Article 238.
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15010238
[13] 朱许强, 沈自茹. 从线性到图谱: 学生学习方式的转向[J]. 教育评论, 2025(7): 93-102.
[14] 汪文义, 宋丽红, 丁树良, 汪腾, 熊建. 非参数认知诊断方法下诊断结果的概率化表征[J]. 心理科学, 2021, 44(5): 1249-1258.
[15] Chen, G., Song, T., Wang, Q., Ma, Z., Hu, J., Li, Q., et al. (2025) Knowledge Graph and Large Language Model Integration with Focus on Educational Applications: A Survey. Neurocomputing, 654, Article 131230.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2025.131230
[16] 李晓理, 刘春芳, 耿劭坤. 知识图谱与大语言模型协同共生模式及其教育应用综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2025, 61(15): 1-13.