浅析英国普通法与衡平法的关系——以信托制度的演变为视角
A Brief Analysis of the Relationship between Common Law and Equity in England—From the Perspective of the Evolution of the Trust System
摘要: 英国法的三种基本法律渊源为普通法、衡平法以及制定法。作为英国法律的主体,普通法一直在英国法律史上扮演着至关重要的角色。衡平法是基于普通法的不足和缺陷而形成的,具有普通法所不具备的灵活性和创新性。本文选择信托制度这一具体切入点,通过阐述两种法律体系的发展过程,结合当时的经济背景探究了普通法的僵化以及随之兴起的衡平法,深入研究了信托制度的演变如何体现了普通法与衡平法的互动与博弈。文章阐明了衡平法与普通法之间推动补充、相互配合的关系,希望能加深对英国法律制度的了解,从而为我国的法治建设与进步提供思路。
Abstract: The three basic sources of English law are common law, equity, and statute law. As the principal body of English law, the common law has always played a crucial role in English legal history. Equity was formed in response to the deficiencies and defects of the common law, and possesses flexibility and innovation that the common law lacks. Taking the trust institution as a specific point of entry, this paper explains the development of the two legal systems and, in light of the economic background of the time, explores the rigidity of the common law and the consequent rise of equity. It further examines in depth how the evolution of the trust institution reflects the interaction and contest between the common law and equity. The article clarifies the complementary and mutually cooperative relationship between equity and the common law, hoping to deepen understanding of the English legal system and thereby provide insights for the construction and advancement of the rule of law in China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Maitland, F.W. (1908) The Constitutional History of England. Cambridge University Press.
|
|
[2]
|
Baker, J.H. (1990) An Introduction to English Legal History. Butterworths.
|
|
[3]
|
沈宗灵. 论普通法和衡平法的历史发展和现状[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 1986(3): 45-53.
|
|
[4]
|
杨迦. 论英国衡平法的形成与发展[J]. 当代经理人, 2006(5): 130-131.
|
|
[5]
|
蔡蕾. 英国衡平法探源[J]. 理论界, 2006(8): 90-91.
|
|
[6]
|
敖海静. 英国衡平法上救济先于权利原则的衍生[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2018, 33(3): 156-166.
|
|
[7]
|
程汉大. 12-13世纪英国法律制度的革命性变化[J]. 世界历史, 2000(5): 85-95.
|
|
[8]
|
胡健. 衰亡还是重生——英国大法官的历史演进[J]. 比较法研究, 2005(6): 21-29.
|
|
[9]
|
海静. 论英国衡平法兴起的理论基础[J]. 社会科学动态, 2017(10): 95-103.
|
|
[10]
|
张怡铭. 试论英国衡平法的发展历程——从权利救济角度探究[J]. 法制与社会, 2015(22): 13-14.
|
|
[11]
|
孟子群. 探究英国普通法的形成条件[J]. 现代交际, 2021(18): 218-220.
|
|
[12]
|
吕富强. 论中世纪教会对普通法信托制度的起源和形成所发挥的作用[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2013, 35(12): 35-47.
|
|
[13]
|
赵廉慧. 作为民法特别法的信托法[J]. 环球法律评论, 2021, 43(1): 68-84.
|
|
[14]
|
黎华献. 商业秘密价值性要件之证明[J]. 法商研究, 2026, 43(5): 63-77.
|
|
[15]
|
孟勤国, 周勃. 资产收益权交易的信托性质与效力边界[J]. 河北法学, 2026, 44(6): 27-45.
|
|
[16]
|
赵磊. 公司法上信义义务的体系构成——兼评新《公司法》相关规定[J]. 财经法学, 2024(3): 67-80.
|
|
[17]
|
王康. 论信托忠实义务的特性、制度功能与解释论展开[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2025(4): 248-265.
|
|
[18]
|
庞金友, 申芙源. 极化冲坠规范: 西方现代政治秩序的理实抵牾[J]. 学习与探索, 2025(8): 25-35+177.
|
|
[19]
|
葛俏. 遗嘱信托制度的中国法构造[J]. 政法论丛, 2026(2): 156-170.
|