气候信息披露对企业税收筹划的倒U型影响研究
Research on the Inverted U-Shaped Impact of Climate Information Disclosure on Corporate Tax Planning
摘要: 在气候信息披露由自愿向强制转型的背景下,气候信息披露如何影响企业税收决策值得探讨。本文选取2015~2024年中国A股上市企业为样本,实证分析气候信息披露与企业税收筹划的内在关联。研究发现:气候信息披露与企业税收筹划呈显著倒U型关系;融资约束、媒体监督发挥部分中介效应。异质性检验表明,该倒U型效应在小规模企业、非重污染企业、高环境规制地区企业中更显著。本文拓展了气候信息披露的微观经济后果研究,为统筹气候信息监管与企业税务合规提供了经验证据。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the transition from voluntary to mandatory climate information disclosure, the impact of such disclosure on corporate tax decision-making warrants investigation. This paper selects Chinese A-share listed companies from 2015 to 2024 as the sample to empirically analyze the intrinsic relationship between climate information disclosure and corporate tax planning. The study finds a significant inverted U-shaped relationship between climate information disclosure and corporate tax planning, with financing constraints and media scrutiny acting as partial mediators. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that this inverted U-shaped effect is more pronounced among small-scale enterprises, non-heavily polluting enterprises, and enterprises located in regions with strict environmental regulations. This paper expands research on the microeconomic consequences of climate information disclosure and provides empirical evidence for balancing climate information regulation with corporate tax compliance.
文章引用:苏孝雲. 气候信息披露对企业税收筹划的倒U型影响研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(10): 126-137. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.1610342

参考文献

[1] Xie, C., Xu, C., Huang, Y., Liu, J., Shao, X., Xu, X., et al. (2025) Advances in the Study of Natural Disasters Induced by the “23.7” Extreme Rainfall Event in North China. Natural Hazards Research, 5, 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2025.01.003
[2] Zhang, R., Wang, S., Zhang, S., Lai, Y. and Li, H. (2026) Climate Change and Firm-Level Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-026-07394-2
[3] Zhang, F., Qin, X. and Liu, L. (2020) The Interaction Effect between ESG and Green Innovation and Its Impact on Firm Value from the Perspective of Information Disclosure. Sustainability, 12, Article 1866.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051866
[4] Liu, Y.T. (2024) Study on the Correlation between Environmental Information Disclosure and Corporate Value of Listed Companies. Accounting and Corporate Management, 6, 34-41.
[5] 黄珺, 朱攀. 社会责任信息披露、管理层信任度与投资者决策[J]. 软科学, 2015, 29(5): 68-72.
[6] 陈志军, 董美彤, 马鹏程, 闵亦杰. 媒体与机构投资者关注对内部控制的交互作用——来自国有企业的经验数据[J]. 财贸研究, 2020, 31(9): 99-110.
[7] 高杰英, 褚冬晓, 廉永辉, 郑君. ESG表现能改善企业投资效率吗? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(11): 24-34, 72.
[8] 符少燕, 李慧云. 碳信息披露的价值效应: 环境监管的调节作用[J]. 统计研究, 2018, 35(9): 92-102.
[9] 王星月, 汪涛, 冯巧根. 国有资本参股能够改善资本市场信息摩擦吗?——来自ESG评级分歧视角的证据[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(6): 96-112.
[10] 曹越, 唐奕可, 胡文君, 虞富荣. ESG评级分歧对企业避税行为的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(8): 28-37.
[11] Baalouch, F., Damak-Ayadi, S., Hussainey, K. and Haj-Salem, I. (2023) The Consequences of Environmental Disclosure Quality: Evidence from France. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 7, 8-20.
https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv7i3p1
[12] 罗拥华, 刘思源. 分析师关注对企业避税的影响研究——一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 22(2): 48-59.
[13] Dyck, A., Volchkova, N. and Zingales, L. (2008) The Corporate Governance Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia. The Journal of Finance, 63, 1093-1135.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01353.x
[14] 徐向艺, 李鑫. 媒体监督参与公司治理研究的文献评述与分析[J]. 东岳论丛, 2014, 35(2): 145-148.
[15] 葛源, 张岩, 程宝栋. 林业企业环境信息披露能增加企业价值吗? [J]. 林业经济, 2021, 43(3): 52-64.
[16] 刘笑霞, 郭思远. 媒体负面报道、内部信息环境与公司避税[J]. 证券市场导报, 2019(3): 49-58.
[17] 刘行, 叶康涛. 企业的避税活动会影响投资效率吗? [J]. 会计研究, 2013(6): 47-53, 96.
[18] 郭娜, 刘岩, 冯慧群. 气候信息披露能够提高企业信贷可得性吗[J]. 会计研究, 2025(7): 124-137.
[19] 严若森, 张素各. 同伴企业环境信息披露质量与家族企业绿色创新——基于二元合法性视角的检验[J]. 南开管理评论, 2025, 28(12): 130-141.
[20] 乔智宏, 程中海. 以数促稳: 数字技术应用与城市出口韧性[J]. 广东财经大学学报, 2026, 41(3): 33-48.
[21] 刘颖斐, 史佳睿, 向珊, 张小虎. 审计师可以为交易所提供监管线索吗?——基于年报问询与关键审计事项关系的证据[J]. 审计研究, 2023(1): 136-148.
[22] Desai, M.A. and Dharmapala, D. (2006) Corporate Tax Avoidance and High-Powered Incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 145-179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
[23] 庄序莹, 周子轩. 地方财政压力会影响企业税负粘性吗——一种企业税负“痛感”的解释[J]. 当代财经, 2022(6): 37-49.
[24] 刘畅. 大数据发展能否抑制企业避税——基于国家大数据综合试验区设立的准自然实验[J]. 东岳论丛, 2026, 47(4): 123-136.
[25] 刘畅, 张景华. 环境责任、企业性质与企业税负[J]. 财贸研究, 2020, 31(9): 64-75.
[26] 周飞飞. 企业ESG表现与税收规避: “管理工具”或“漂绿工具” [J]. 产业经济评论, 2025(5): 29-51.
[27] 刘志远, 官小燕. 环境规制影响企业税收规避吗?——基于新《环保法》实施的准自然实验[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2024, 39(1): 85-94.
[28] 王世进, 徐佳琦. 资源依赖度对城市碳排放效率的传导机制及效应研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2026, 18(1): 175-192.
[29] 李维安, 李鼎, 周宁. 环境规制与企业绿色治理机会主义行为——基于ESG框架的分析[J]. 经济管理, 2025, 47(1): 5-23.