|
[1]
|
Gotzner, N., Spalek, K. and Wartenburger, I. (2013) How Pitch Accents and Focus Particles Affect the Recognition of Contextual Alternatives. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, 31 July-3 August 2013, 2434-2440.
|
|
[2]
|
Fraundorf, S.H., Watson, D.G. and Benjamin, A.S. (2010) Recognition Memory Reveals Just How Contrastive Accenting Really Is. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 367-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.004
|
|
[3]
|
Chen, L. and Yang, Y. (2015) Emphasizing the Only Character: Emphasis, Attention and Contrast. Cognition, 136, 222-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.015
|
|
[4]
|
Hoeks, M., Toosarvandani, M. and Rysling, A. (2023) Processing of Linguistic Focus Depends on Contrastive Alternatives. Journal of Memory and Language, 132, Article 104444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2023.104444
|
|
[5]
|
Hsu, Y.Y. (2019) Associations between Focus Constructions and Levels of Exhaustivity: An Experimental Investigation of Chinese. PLOS ONE, 14, e0223502. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223502
|
|
[6]
|
Xue, J. and Onea, E. (2011) Correlation between Presupposition Projection and At-Issueness: An Empirical Study. Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2011 Workshop on Projective Meaning, Ljubljana, 1-5 August 2011, 171-184.
|
|
[7]
|
Büring, D. and Križ, M. (2013) It’s That, and That’s It! Exhaustivity and Homogeneity Presuppositions in Clefts (and Definites). Semantics and Pragmatics, 6, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.6.6
|
|
[8]
|
Drenhaus, H., Zimmermann, M. and Vasishth, S. (2011) Exhaustiveness Effects in Clefts Are Not Truth-Functional. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 320-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2010.10.004
|
|
[9]
|
Staub, A., White, S.J., Drieghe, D., Hollway, E.C. and Rayner, K. (2010) Distributional Effects of Word Frequency on Eye Fixation Durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1280-1293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016896
|
|
[10]
|
Drieghe, D., Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (2008) Mislocated Fixations Can Account for Parafoveal-on-Foveal Effects in Eye Movements during Reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1239-1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701467953
|
|
[11]
|
White, S.J. (2008) Eye Movement Control during Reading: Effects of Word Frequency and Orthographic Familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 205-223. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.205
|
|
[12]
|
Ma, G. and Zhuang, X. (2018) Distributional Analyses of Word Frequency Effects in Chinese Sentence Reading and Lexical Decision Tasks: Distributional Analyses in Reading Chinese Texts. Journal of Research in Reading, 41, 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12259
|
|
[13]
|
Rayner, K. and Pollatsek, A. (1989) The Psychology of Reading. Prentice Hall.
|
|
[14]
|
R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
|
|
[15]
|
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. and Tily, H.J. (2013) Random Effects Structure for Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing: Keep It Maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
|
|
[16]
|
Andrews, S. and Heathcote, A. (2001) Distinguishing Common and Task-Specific Processes in Word Identification: A Matter of Some Moment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 514-544. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.514
|
|
[17]
|
Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Cortese, M.J. and Watson, J.M. (2008) Beyond Mean Response Latency: Response Time Distributional Analyses of Semantic Priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 495-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.10.004
|
|
[18]
|
Ratcliff, R. (1979) Group Reaction Time Distributions and an Analysis of Distribution Statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
|
|
[19]
|
Birch, S. and Rayner, K. (2010) Effects of Syntactic Prominence on Eye Movements during Reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 740-752. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.38.6.740
|