制造业出口贸易隐含碳排放的计量与驱动机制研究——碳关税视角下的广东省证据
Measurement and Driving Mechanism of Embodied Carbon Emissions in Manufacturing Exports—Evidence from Guangdong Province in the Context of Carbon Tariffs
DOI: 10.12677/sd.2026.1610345, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王 胜*:广东科学技术职业学院财金学院,广东 珠海;方泽满:韩山师范学院经济与管理学院,广东 潮州
关键词: 碳关税;隐含碳排放;投入产出模型;系统广义矩估计;广东省制造业;Carbon Tariff; Embodied Carbon Emissions; Input-Output Model; System GMM; Manufacturing Industry of Guangdong Province
摘要: 欧盟碳边境调节机制自2026年起正式征收,出口导向型制造业省份面临的碳成本约束日益显性化。本文以广东省为例,利用2010~2023年26个制造业细分行业的面板数据,采用经进口中间品修正的单区域投入产出模型测算出口隐含碳排放,并以单位产出隐含碳(碳强度)为被解释变量,运用聚类稳健最小二乘、组内去均值、HAC稳健估计、一阶差分与两步系统广义矩估计五种方法识别其驱动机制。结果表明:全省出口隐含碳排放呈先降、后升、再趋稳的轨迹;外商直接投资对行业碳强度具有稳健的减排效应,支持“污染光环”假说,但该效应在2018年后趋于不显著;约54%的行业存在较强的碳锁定。情景模拟显示,在60美元/吨的基准税率下,全省出口隐含碳关税成本约为577.3亿元,相当于2023年规上工业利润的5.46%;按碳强度排序,黑色金属冶炼、建材、造纸与石油加工业受冲击最为敏感,而按利润侵蚀口径,纺织业承压最重。稳健性检验与敏感性分析表明,核心结论稳健。据此提出分梯队、分行业的低碳转型政策建议。
Abstract: The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has officially entered into force for tariff collection as of 2026, rendering the carbon cost constraints confronting export-oriented manufacturing provinces increasingly tangible. Taking Guangdong Province as the research context, this paper employs panel data covering 26 disaggregated manufacturing sub-sectors over the period 2010~2023. A single-region input-output model adjusted for imported intermediate inputs is adopted to quantify the embodied carbon emissions in exports. Using embodied carbon per unit of output (i.e., carbon intensity) as the dependent variable, this study identifies its underlying driving mechanisms through five econometric specifications: cluster-robust ordinary least squares, within-group mean detrending, HAC robust estimation, first-differenced regression, and the two-step system generalized method of moments. The empirical results indicate that the trajectory of Guangdong’s total export embodied carbon emissions follows a three-phase pattern: an initial decline, a subsequent rise, and a final trend toward stabilization. Foreign direct investment exerts a robust emission-reduction effect on sectoral carbon intensity, which validates the “Pollution Halo Hypothesis”, whereas this mitigating effect becomes statistically insignificant after 2018. Approximately 54% of the sampled industries exhibit strong carbon lock-in effects. Scenario simulation reveals that under the benchmark carbon tariff rate of 60 USD per ton, the total CBAM-related cost for Guangdong’s export sector amounts to roughly 57.73 billion RMB, equivalent to 5.46% of the province’s industrial profits of enterprises above designated size in 2023. When ranked by carbon intensity, ferrous metal smelting, building materials, papermaking, and petroleum processing are the most vulnerable sectors to CBAM shocks, while the textile industry faces the severest pressure in terms of profit erosion. A battery of robustness checks and sensitivity analyses confirms the reliability of the core findings. This paper concludes with tiered, sector-specific policy recommendations to facilitate targeted low-carbon transition.
文章引用:王胜, 方泽满. 制造业出口贸易隐含碳排放的计量与驱动机制研究——碳关税视角下的广东省证据[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(10): 165-177. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.1610345

参考文献

[1] European Commission (2023) Regulation (EU) 2023/956 Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/956/oj
[2] U.S. Senate (2022) Clean Competition Act (S. 4355, 117th Congress).
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4355
[3] 中共中央 国务院关于完整准确全面贯彻新发展理念做好碳达峰碳中和工作的意见[EB/OL].
http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-10/24/content_5644613.htm, 2021-10-24.
[4] Peters, G.P., Minx, J.C., Weber, C.L. and Edenhofer, O. (2011) Growth in Emission Transfers via International Trade from 1990 to 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 8903-8908.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006388108
[5] Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B. (1995) Economic Growth and the Environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353-377.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
[6] Copeland, B.R. and Taylor, M.S. (2004) Trade, Growth, and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 7-71.
https://doi.org/10.1257/.42.1.7
[7] Eskeland, G.S. and Harrison, A.E. (2003) Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 70, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3878(02)00084-6
[8] Cole, M.A. and Elliott, R.J.R. (2005) FDI and the Capital Intensity of “Dirty” Sectors: A Missing Piece of the Pollution Haven Puzzle. Review of Development Economics, 9, 530-548.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2005.00292.x
[9] Birdsall, N. and Wheeler, D. (1993) Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where Are the Pollution Havens? The Journal of Environment & Development, 2, 137-149.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659300200107
[10] Wang, H. and Jin, Y. (2006) Industrial Ownership and Environmental Performance: Evidence from China. Environmental and Resource Economics, 36, 255-273.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9027-x
[11] 许和连, 邓玉萍. 外商直接投资导致了中国的环境污染吗?——基于中国省际面板数据的空间计量研究[J]. 管理世界, 2012, 28(2): 30-43.
[12] 王少剑, 田莎莎, 蔡清楠, 等. 产业转移背景下广东省工业碳排放的驱动因素及碳转移分析[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(9): 2606-2622.
[13] IPCC (2019) 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. IPCC.
[14] Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998) Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8
[15] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 4754-2017国民经济行业分类[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[16] 国家统计局能源统计司. 中国能源统计年鉴2023 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024.
[17] 广东省统计局, 国家统计局广东调查总队. 广东统计年鉴2024 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2024.
[18] 2024年广东规模以上工业企业效益简况[EB/OL].
http://stats.gd.gov.cn/tjkx185/content/post_4663698.html, 2025-02-05.
[19] 生态环境部、国家统计局关于发布2021年电力二氧化碳排放因子的公告[EB/OL].
https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202404/t20240412_1070565.html, 2024-04-12.
[20] 关于发布2022年电力二氧化碳排放因子的公告[EB/OL].
https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202412/t20241226_1099413.html, 2024-12-26.
[21] 关于发布2023年电力二氧化碳排放因子的公告[EB/OL].
https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202512/t20251231_1139517.html, 2025-12-31.