临沂市特色果蔬产业利益联结模式优化研究
Optimization of Benefit-Linkage Models in Linyi’s Specialty Fruit and Vegetable Industry
摘要: 目的:研究临沂市特色果蔬产业中龙头企业、合作社、村集体与农户之间的利益联结关系,识别价值增值、收益分配、组织协同与风险分担中的关键约束。方法:以兰陵蔬菜、沂南黄瓜、蒙阴蜜桃及河东草莓等产业为主要观察对象,在文献研究、政府公开资料分析、典型模式比较和机制归纳基础上,引入价值链治理与新制度经济学视角,从价值创造、交易成本、契约安排、收益分配和风险承担五个环节构建分析框架。结果:临沂已形成订单收购、服务带动、股份合作、联合体嵌入和品牌渠道共享等多种联结方式,但不同模式在稳定收益、分享增值、控制交易成本和约束机会主义行为方面存在差异。结论:利益联结机制不存在适用于所有主体的单一最优方案;“保底价 + 市场浮动 + 质量加价 + 二次返利”、多层级组织联结、保险与履约保障等机制,应根据产品易腐性、市场波动、经营规模、治理能力和数据基础进行组合选择,并在稳定农户预期与维持市场激励之间实现权衡。
Abstract: Objective: This study examines benefit-linkage relationships among leading agribusinesses, farmers’ cooperatives, village collectives and farm households in Linyi’s specialty fruit and vegetable industry, with particular attention to value creation, distribution, organizational coordination and risk sharing. Methods: The analysis covers major specialty clusters including Lanling vegetables, Yinan cucumbers, Mengyin peaches and Hedong strawberries. Literature review, policy-text analysis, official statistics and comparative case analysis are combined with perspectives from value-chain governance and new institutional economics. An analytical framework is constructed around value creation, transaction costs, contractual arrangements, benefit distribution and risk allocation. Results: Linyi has developed diversified linkage forms, including contract purchasing, service-based linkage, shareholding cooperation, industrial consortiums and brand/channel sharing. However, these arrangements differ in their capacity to stabilize farm income, transmit downstream value added, reduce transaction costs and constrain opportunistic behavior. Conclusions: No single linkage model is optimal for all products and actors. Mixed pricing, multi-level organization, insurance, performance guarantees and digital settlement should be selected according to product perishability, market volatility, operating scale, governance capacity and data conditions. The key is to balance income stability for smallholders with market incentives and organizational sustainability.
文章引用:张驰, 王思文, 张翰雄, 张珊妹, 袁健博. 临沂市特色果蔬产业利益联结模式优化研究[J]. 农业科学, 2026, 16(10): 1555-1563. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjas.2026.1610185

参考文献

[1] 钟真, 涂圣伟, 张照新. 紧密型农业产业化利益联结机制的构建[J]. 改革, 2021(4): 107-120.
[2] 姚秋涵, 于乐荣. 乡村产业振兴中的联农带农实践: 类型、逻辑与成效[J]. 西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2024, 45(6): 202-208.
[3] 梁海兵, 姚仁福. 合约安排与小农户增收: 对“小农户 + 合作社”体系中三种典型利益联结模式的考察[J]. 经济科学, 2024(3): 158-177.
[4] 郭芸芸, 杨久栋, 陈威. 企农利益联结机制如何改善农业企业发展绩效?——基于农业企业调查数据的实证检验[J]. 农村经济, 2023(4): 126-136.
[5] 熊凤水, 徐丽. 内外兼具: 紧密型农企利益联结机制的实践探索[J]. 经济与管理, 2024, 38(1): 26-35.
[6] 陈健, 梁栋. 农业产业化联合体联农带农的嵌入式发展机制研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 24(4): 54-62.
[7] 梁海兵, 姚仁福. 乡村特色产业主体利益联结: 理论框架、脱钩逻辑与复联路径[J]. 农业经济问题, 2024(9): 41-53.
[8] 平卫英, 张谊瑞. 农民合作社与农户结构性增收: 影响效应与机制检验[J]. 农村经济, 2023(12): 82-92.
[9] 刘浩, 刘宇荧, 傅新红. 合作社标准化生产服务能够提升农户收入吗? [J]. 农村经济, 2021(12): 55-62.
[10] 孔祥智, 黄斌. 农民合作社联合社运行机制研究[J]. 东岳论丛, 2021, 42(4): 5-16+191.
[11] 于乐荣. 产业振兴中小农户与现代农业衔接的路径、机制及条件——以订单农业为例[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2021(2): 156-162.
[12] 江帆, 袁云云. 国内农业社会化服务研究综述[J]. 西部论坛, 2023, 33(2): 111-124.
[13] 刘玮, 孙丽兵, 庹国柱. 农业保险对农户收入的影响机制研究——基于有调节的中介效应[J]. 农业技术经济, 2022(6): 4-18.
[14] 丁鑫, 张志新, 郭如意. 市场可达性如何促进农户参与产业融合? [J]. 世界农业, 2024(2): 99-111.
[15] 朱岩, 马传兵. 数字技术条件下特色农产品的品牌价值提升[J]. 公共治理研究, 2023, 35(5): 89-96.