人工智能对痴呆症的刻板印象——基于文生图模型生成图像的多模态批评话语分析
Stereotypes of Dementia in Artificial Intelligence—A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis Based on Images Generated by Text-to-Image Models
摘要: 社会对痴呆症的认知是保证患者及其家属身心健康、构建良好社会关系的重要议题。本研究基于视觉语法,运用国内六款文生图模型,生成248幅提示词为“痴呆症/dementia”的图像,并从辩证关系视角进行多模态批评话语分析。结果表明,人工智能多从个人与社会视角进行展示,并在年龄、文化背景等方面呈现视觉偏见,将痴呆症污名化、边缘化,与目前社会对于痴呆症的认知具有一致性。但同时也存在部分与公众认知相反的痴呆症视觉友好话语。本研究揭示了AI生成图像在强化和放大有害刻板印象方面的潜在风险,强调了对这些图像进行批评性话语分析的必要性,以及在AI设计和使用中融入伦理考量的重要性,以减少刻板印象的传播及其潜在危害。
Abstract: The societal perception and understanding of dementia is a critical factor in ensuring the mental and physical well-being of patients and their families, as well as in building positive social relationships. This research, grounded in visual grammar theory, utilized six domestic text-to-image generation models to create 248 images with the prompt “dementia” and conducted a multimodal critical discourse analysis from a dialectical perspective. The results revealed that artificial intelligence predominantly presents dementia from personal and societal viewpoints, exhibiting visual biases in aspects such as age and cultural background, which serve to stigmatize and marginalize dementia. These representations align with current societal perceptions of dementia. However, the study also identified certain visually friendly discourses that contradict public cognition. This research illuminates the potential risks of AI-generated images in reinforcing and amplifying harmful stereotypes, emphasizing the necessity of conducting critical discourse analysis on these images. It also underscores the importance of integrating ethical considerations into AI design and usage to mitigate the spread of stereotypes and their potential harms.
文章引用:崔靖茹. 人工智能对痴呆症的刻板印象——基于文生图模型生成图像的多模态批评话语分析[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(10): 579-589. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.14101030

参考文献

[1] 王佳宇, 赵亚茹. 后人文主义语言学视域下中国批评话语分析的理论重筑与方法创新[J]. 当代修辞学, 2025(3): 59-69.
[2] 何苑, 赵紫晨, 李晟宁. 智能拟态环境转向下西方文生图模型对中国形象的视觉修辞建构研究[J]. 中国编辑, 2025(4): 33-42.
[3] 张雯, 张睿婕. 人工智能对新闻业形象的想象与期待——基于文生图模型生成图像的诠释分析[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2024(11): 49-64.
[4] 黄阳坤, 苏思妮, 高远. 作为刻板印象“容器”的生成式智能: 从“像化”框架到传播后效——基于文-图生成模型的混合研究[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2024(6): 61-82.
[5] Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans., Routledge. (Original Work Published 1969)
[6] Zeilig, H. (2014) Dementia as a Cultural Metaphor. The Gerontologist, 54, 258-267.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns203
[7] Zimmermann, M. (2017) Alzheimer’s Disease Metaphors as Mirror and Lens to the Stigma of Dementia. Literature and Medicine, 35, 71-97.
https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2017.0003
[8] Machin, D. (2004) Building the World’s Visual Language: The Increasing Global Importance of Image Banks in Corporate Media. Visual Communication, 3, 316-336.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357204045785
[9] Putland, E., Chikodzore-Paterson, C. and Brookes, G. (2023) Artificial Intelligence and Visual Discourse: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis of AI-Generated Images of “Dementia”. Social Semiotics, 35, 228-253.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2023.2290555
[10] 陈积银, 胡睿心. 大数据的可视化生成论: 生成式人工智能语境下的语图关系新探[J]. 新闻界, 2025(8): 46-59.
[11] 赵中华, 张倩. 走出“科林格里奇困境”: 生成式人工智能的风险表征及治理探索[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 46(4): 8-16.
[12] 郭小平, 秦艺轩. 解构智能传播的数据神话: 算法偏见的成因与风险治理路径[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2019, 41(9): 19-24.
[13] 陈昌凤, 张舒媛. 视觉优势? 生成式人工智能应用于传播的模态偏向问题[J]. 新闻与写作, 2024(10): 5-14.
[14] Putland, E. (2022) The (In)accuracies of Floating Leaves: How People with Varying Experiences of Dementia Differently Position the Same Visual Metaphor. Dementia, 21, 1471-1487.
https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012211072507
[15] McParland, P., Kelly, F. and Innes, A. (2017) Dichotomising Dementia: Is There Another Way? Sociology of Health & Illness, 39, 258-269.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12438
[16] Bailey, A., Dening, T. and Harvey, K. (2021) Battles and Breakthroughs: Representations of Dementia in the British Press. Ageing and Society, 41, 362-376.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x19001120
[17] Hansen, T.E.A., Praestegaard, J., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., Andresen, M. and Nørgaard, B. (2021) Dementia-Friendliness in Danish and International Contexts: A Critical Discourse Analysis. The Gerontologist, 62, 130-141.
https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab056
[18] Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2006) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd Edition, Routledge. (Original Work Published 1996)
[19] 胡正荣, 闫佳琦. 生成式人工智能的价值对齐比较研究——基于2012-2023年十大国际新闻生成评论的实验[J]. 新闻大学, 2024(3): 1-17+117.
[20] Fairclough, N. (2015) Language and Power. 3rd Edition, Routledge.
[21] Halliday, M.A.K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.
[22] Barthes, R. (1977) Image-Music-Text. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[23] Cahill, S. (2018) Dementia and Human Rights. Policy Press.
https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447331377.001.0001
[24] Alzheimer’s Disease International (2019) World Alzheimer Report 2019: Attitudes to Dementia. Alzheimer’s Disease International.
[25] Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2020) Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 3rd Edition, Routledge.
[26] 曾纪丽, 王新宇, 胡芬. 国内痴呆症患者照顾者照护体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(23): 28-34.
[27] Clarke, J.N. (2006) The Case of the Missing Person: Alzheimer’s Disease in Mass Print Magazines 1991-2001. Health Communication, 19, 269-276.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1903_9
[28] Buolamwini, J. and Gebru, T. (2018) Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification. In: Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR, 77-91.
[29] Bianchi, F., Kalluri, P., Durmus, E., Ladhak, F., Cheng, M., Nozza, D., et al. (2023). Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, 1-25.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594095
[30] 周敏, 赵秀丽. 追求平等——对智能传播时代算法公共性重构问题的研究[J]. 北大新闻与传播评论, 2024(0): 189-204.
[31] 于天姝, 顾理平. 人工智能在新闻生产中的应用, 隐忧及应对策略[J]. 新闻爱好者, 2025(1): 54-56.