大跨度斜拉桥车桥耦合振动分析
Vehicle-Bridge Coupling Vibration Analysis of a Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.1510247, PDF,   
作者: 周 澳, 陈 宁*:湖南科技大学土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭;杨靖愉:广东省广晟大宝山铜业股份有限公司,广东 韶关
关键词: 大跨度斜拉桥;ANSYS;车桥耦合振动;冲击系数;路面不平整度;Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge; ANSYS; Vehicle-Bridge Coupling Vibration; Impact Coefficient; Road Surface Roughness
摘要: 随着大跨度斜拉桥的广泛应用,车辆荷载作用下桥梁的动力响应问题日益受到重视。为研究车速和路面不平整度对大跨斜拉桥车桥耦合振动响应及冲击系数的影响规律,本文以某双塔双索面半漂浮体系斜拉桥为工程背景,采用ANSYS软件建立全桥三维有限元模型,基于车–桥系统力与位移协调条件,建立13自由度两轴四轮厢式货车模型,通过Newmark-β法进行时域迭代求解,开展了不同车速(30~90 km/h)和不同路面等级(A级~E级)工况下的车桥耦合振动分析。结果表明:桥梁跨中节点竖向位移和竖向加速度随车速增加呈“先增后减再增大”的复杂变化规律,车速90 km/h时冲击系数达最大值0.1672,较规范值高出234.4%,共振效应显著;随路面等级劣化(A级→E级),跨中最大竖向位移由7.563 mm增至26.553 mm,增幅达3.51倍,冲击系数由0.0295增至2.6146,呈非线性增长趋势。研究揭示了大跨斜拉桥在车辆荷载作用下的动力响应特征及冲击系数的关键影响因素,可为同类桥梁的动力设计及运营维护提供参考。
Abstract: With the widespread application of long-span cable-stayed bridges, their dynamic response under vehicle loads has attracted increasing attention. To investigate the effects of vehicle speed and road surface roughness on the vehicle-bridge coupling vibration response and impact coefficient, a double-tower double-cable-plane semi-floating cable-stayed bridge is taken as the engineering background. A 3D finite element model is established using ANSYS, and a 13-DOF two-axle four-wheel van model is developed based on force-displacement coordination conditions. The Newmark-β method is used for time-domain solution under various speeds (30~90 km/h) and road grades (Class A to Class E). Results show that the vertical displacement and acceleration at mid-span exhibit a “first increasing, then decreasing, and then increasing again” trend with increasing speed. At 90 km/h, the impact coefficient reaches its maximum of 0.1672, which is 234.4% higher than the code value, indicating a significant resonance effect. As the road grade deteriorates (Class A to Class E), the maximum displacement increases from 7.563 mm to 26.553 mm (3.51 times), and the impact coefficient increases from 0.0295 to 2.6146 non-linearly. This study reveals the dynamic response characteristics and key influencing factors of the impact coefficient for long-span cable-stayed bridges under vehicle loads, providing a reference for the dynamic design and operation maintenance of similar bridges.
文章引用:周澳, 陈宁, 杨靖愉. 大跨度斜拉桥车桥耦合振动分析[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(10): 153-166. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.1510247

参考文献

[1] 《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国桥梁工程学术研究综述·2024 [J]. 中国公路学报, 2024, 37(12): 1-160.
[2] 李小珍, 张黎明, 张洁. 公路桥梁与车辆耦合振动研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 工程力学, 2008(3): 230-240.
[3] 刘扬, 赵鹃, 殷新锋. 基于桥面不平整度大跨度斜拉桥的货车行车舒适性[J]. 交通科学与工程, 2014, 30(2): 27-33.
[4] Pourzeynali, S., Zhu, X., Ghari Zadeh, A., Rashidi, M. and Samali, B. (2021) Simultaneous Identification of Bridge Structural Damage and Moving Loads Using the Explicit Form of Newmark-β Method: Numerical and Experimental Studies. Remote Sensing, 14, Article 119.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14010119
[5] Pourzeynali, S., Zhu, X., Ghari Zadeh, A., Rashidi, M. and Samali, B. (2021) Comprehensive Study of Moving Load Identification on Bridge Structures Using the Explicit Form of Newmark-β Method: Numerical and Experimental Studies. Remote Sensing, 13, Article 2291.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13122291
[6] 米奇克, 瓦伦托维兹. 汽车动力学[M]. 第4版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2009.
[7] 格里斯比. 车辆动力学基础[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006.
[8] 喻凡, 林逸. 汽车系统动力学[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2005.
[9] 李永乐. 风-车-桥系统非线性空间耦合振动研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2003.
[10] 韩万水. 风-汽车-桥梁系统空间耦合振动研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 上海: 同济大学, 2006.
[11] 陈宁. 侧风作用下桥上汽车行车安全性及防风措施研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2015.
[12] 卢海林, 蔡恒, 颜燕祥. 大跨度曲线弯梁桥车-桥耦合振动分析[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2019, 51(6): 101-107.
[13] 李运通. 公铁两用简支钢桁梁桥车桥耦合振动分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2024.
[14] 郑海腾, 李尚平, 李冰, 等. 基于谐波叠加法的标准路面谱重构[J]. 机械研究与应用, 2014, 27(6): 82-83+86.
[15] JTG D60-2015公路桥涵设计通用规范[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015.
[16] 谢旭, 朱越峰, 申永刚. 大跨度钢索和CFRP索斜拉桥车桥耦合振动研究[J]. 工程力学, 2007, 24(z1): 53-61.
[17] 王贵春, 陈卫丽. 基于车桥耦合振动的大跨度斜拉桥冲击系数研究[J]. 公路工程, 2015, 40(6): 119-124.