旅游决策情境下技术感知与主观规范对大学生生成式人工智能采纳行为的影响研究
Research on the Influence of Technology Perception and Subjective Norms on College Students’ Generative Artificial Intelligence Adoption Behavior in Tourism Decision-Making
摘要: 生成式人工智能(GenAI)已深度嵌入大学生的信息获取与旅游决策过程,但其采纳行为背后的心理机制仍缺乏系统检验。本研究整合技术接受模型(TAM)与计划行为理论(TPB),基于208份有效问卷数据,运用结构方程模型(SEM)检验感知易用性、感知有用性与主观规范对使用意愿及实际使用行为的影响。研究发现:1) 感知易用性显著正向影响感知有用性,感知有用性显著正向影响使用意愿,感知易用性对使用意愿的直接影响不显著,感知有用性在二者之间发挥中介作用(Bootstrap检验95%置信区间不含0);2) 主观规范对使用意愿的影响不显著(β = 0.408, p = 0.052),处于显著性边界;3) 使用意愿显著正向影响实际使用行为。研究表明,感知有用性是连接技术感知与使用意愿的核心变量,技术感知路径的独立解释力相对强于主观规范路径。本研究拓展了技术接受模型在旅游决策情境下的适用边界,可为GenAI旅游产品的功能设计提供参考。
Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has been deeply embedded in college students’ information acquisition and tourism decision-making, yet the psychological mechanisms underlying their adoption behavior remain under-examined. Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and based on 208 valid questionnaires, this study uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to examine the influence of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and subjective norms on usage intention and actual usage behavior. The results show that: 1) perceived ease of use significantly and positively affects perceived usefulness, which in turn significantly enhances usage intention, while the direct effect of perceived ease of use on usage intention is not significant, indicating that perceived usefulness plays a mediating role (bootstrap 95% CI excluding zero); 2) the effect of subjective norms on usage intention is not significant (β = 0.408, p = 0.052), lying on the boundary of statistical significance; 3) usage intention significantly and positively affects actual usage behavior. The findings indicate that perceived usefulness is the core variable linking technology perception to usage intention, and that the technology perception path exhibits relatively stronger independent explanatory power than the subjective norm path. This study extends the applicability of TAM to tourism decision-making contexts and provides implications for the functional design of GenAI-based tourism products.
文章引用:钱骏赫, 曾敏. 旅游决策情境下技术感知与主观规范对大学生生成式人工智能采纳行为的影响研究[J]. 可持续发展, 2026, 16(10): 226-239. https://doi.org/10.12677/sd.2026.1610351

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网络信息中心. 第55次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[EB/OL]. 2025-01-01.
https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2025/0117/c88-11229.html, 2025-04-06.
[2] 华成钢, 白长虹, 韦鸣秋. 移动互联时代旅游信息服务体验对出游决策的影响研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2019, 34(11): 51-65.
[3] 徐伟, 戴其文, 代嫣红, 等. 抖音短视频对用户旅游决策行为的影响机制研究[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2023, 46(6): 62-70.
[4] 许亚元, 姚国荣. 网络口碑对游客目的地决策影响研究——以赴黄山的游客为例[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2020, 39(3): 99-104.
[5] 王珮, 刘梦瑶, 何洋. 小红书营销对大学生旅游决策影响因素研究[J]. 新媒体研究, 2022, 8(22): 41-45.
[6] 李白杨, 白云, 詹希旎, 等. 人工智能生成内容(AIGC)的技术特征与形态演进[J]. 图书情报知识, 2023, 40(1): 66-74.
[7] Carvalho, I. and Ivanov, S. (2024) ChatGPT for Tourism: Applications, Benefits and Risks. Tourism Review, 79, 290-303.
https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-02-2023-0088
[8] Christensen, J., Hansen, J.M. and Wilson, P. (2025) Understanding the Role and Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Hallucination within Consumers’ Tourism Decision-Making Processes. Current Issues in Tourism, 28, 545-560.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2300032
[9] Kelly, S., Kaye, S. and Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023) What Factors Contribute to the Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence? A Systematic Review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, Article ID: 101925.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925
[10] 刘鸣筝, 王硕. 技术想象与技术实践的交织——科学传播视域下公众对生成式人工智能的认知、评估与使用[J]. 国际新闻界, 2024, 46(4): 32-51.
[11] Celik, I. (2023) Exploring the Determinants of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy: Digital Divide, Computational Thinking, Cognitive Absorption. Telematics and Informatics, 83, Article ID: 102026.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026
[12] Susnjak, T. and McIntosh, T. (2024) ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? Education Sciences, 14, Article No. 656.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060656
[13] Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
[14] Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.
[15] Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
[16] Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A. and Larsen, K.R.T. (2003) The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 752-780.
https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01250
[17] Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996) A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Sciences, 27, 451-481.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
[18] Shih, H. (2004) Extended Technology Acceptance Model of Internet Utilization Behavior. Information & Management, 41, 719-729.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.009
[19] Chen, S.C., Yen, D.C. and Peng, S.C. (2018) Assessing the Impact of Determinants in E-Magazines Acceptance: An Empirical Study. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 57, 49-58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.11.004
[20] Wu, B. and Chen, X. (2017) Continuance Intention to Use MOOCs: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task Technology Fit (TTF) Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221-232.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
[21] 黄顺铭, 李妍. 移动阅读的“技术接受模型” (TAM)——一个结构方程模型的分析[J]. 新闻界, 2015(21): 34-41.
[22] 朱秀凌. 手机技术反哺、亲子沟通与父母教养方式——基于技术接受与使用整合模型的分析[J]. 新闻大学, 2018(4): 108-119+155.
[23] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
[24] 李彪. 数字反哺与群体压力: 老年群体微信朋友圈使用行为影响因素研究[J]. 国际新闻界, 2020, 42(3): 32-48.
[25] 贺建平, 黄肖肖. 城市老年人的智能手机使用与实现幸福感: 基于代际支持理论和技术接受模型[J]. 国际新闻界, 2020, 42(3): 49-73.
[26] Hagger, M.S., Anderson, M., Kyriakaki, M. and Darkings, S. (2007) Aspects of Identity and Their Influence on Intentional Behavior: Comparing Effects for Three Health Behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 355-367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.07.017
[27] 盛光华, 岳蓓蓓, 龚思羽. 共享单车用户持续使用意愿研究——基于TAM理论的拓展模型[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(6): 567-574.
[28] Duong, C.D., Nguyen, T.H., Ngo, T.V.N., Pham, T.T.P., Vu, A.T. and Dang, N.S. (2025) Using Generative Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) for Travel Purposes: Parasocial Interaction and Tourists’ Continuance Intention. Tourism Review, 80, 813-827.
https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-01-2024-0027
[29] 邓秀军, 赵悦言. 职业需求与技术器用的适配和内化: “接触-感知”因素影响下传媒从业者的生成式人工智能采纳意愿研究[J]. 新闻界, 2025(10): 59-75.
[30] Ding, L., Velicer, W.F. and Harlow, L.L. (1995) Effects of Estimation Methods, Number of Indicators per Factor, and Improper Solutions on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2, 119-143.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540000
[31] Yang, K.C.C. (2005) Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption of Mobile Commerce in Singapore. Telematics and Informatics, 22, 257-277.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2004.11.003
[32] Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[33] Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988) Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
[34] MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S. and Hong, S. (1999) Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.4.1.84
[35] Hu, L. and Bentler, P.M. (1999) Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118