智慧养老服务的伦理审视与治理路径
Ethical Examination and Governance Pathways for Smart Elderly Care Services
摘要: 人口老龄化与数字技术深度融合催生了智慧养老服务模式,但其发展并非单纯的技术应用,而是关乎老年群体尊严与福祉的伦理实践。智慧养老内蕴科技向善的技术底色、以人为本的价值核心、孝亲敬老的文化传承以及公平正义的社会追求,构成多维伦理价值体系。然而,当前实践面临观念认知偏差、制度供给缺位、产业发展失衡与技术理性僭越等现实伦理困境,致使人文关怀遭遇消解、伦理价值未能充分释放。破解上述困境需从观念培育、制度完善、产业升级与技术优化四维路径协同推进,在技术效率与人文关怀之间建立动态平衡,使智慧养老真正成为守护老年幸福、促进社会公平的民生支撑。
Abstract: The deep integration of population aging and digital technology has given rise to the model of smart elderly care services. However, its development is not merely a technological application, but rather an ethical practice that concerns the dignity and well-being of the older population. Smart elderly care embodies the technological ethos of “technology for good,” the value core of human-centeredness, the cultural heritage of filial piety and respect for the aged, and the social pursuit of fairness and justice—together constituting a multi-dimensional system of ethical values. Nevertheless, current practices face realistic ethical dilemmas, including cognitive biases, institutional deficits, industrial imbalances, and the overreach of technological rationality, which have led to the erosion of humanistic care and the underutilization of ethical values. To address these dilemmas, it is necessary to promote coordinated governance along four pathways: cultivating correct perceptions, improving institutional frameworks, upgrading industrial structures, and optimizing technological applications. Only by establishing a dynamic equilibrium between technological efficiency and humanistic care can smart elderly care truly become a pillar of social welfare that safeguards the happiness of the elderly and promotes social equity.
文章引用:吴宇婷. 智慧养老服务的伦理审视与治理路径[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(10): 492-498. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.1310783

参考文献

[1] 杨耀文, 杨芳. 智慧养老的伦理价值及优化路径研究[J]. 淮南师范学院学报, 2023, 25(4): 110-115.
[2] 庞永红, 杨钊. 中国基本养老服务制度的伦理向度[J]. 中州学刊, 2024(5): 110-117.
[3] 余良年. 论语译注[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1995.
[4] Cimperman, M., Makovec Brenčič, M. and Trkman, P. (2016) Analyzing Older Users’ Home Telehealth Services Acceptance Behavior—Applying an Extended UTAUT Model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 90, 22-31.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.002
[5] 赵继伦, 郑瑶. 养老智能化的伦理风险及对策建议[J]. 福祉研究, 2021, 4(0): 71-78.
[6] Matthias, A. (2004) The Responsibility Gap: Ascribing Responsibility for the Actions of Learning Automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 175-183.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1
[7] Friemel, T.N. (2014) The Digital Divide Has Grown Old: Determinants of a Digital Divide among Seniors. New Media & Society, 18, 313-331.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
[8] Peek, S.T.M., Wouters, E.J.M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K.G., Boeije, H.R. and Vrijhoef, H.J.M. (2014) Factors Influencing Acceptance of Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83, 235-248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
[9] Sharkey, A. and Sharkey, N. (2010) Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14, 27-40.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6
[10] 肖霄瑶. 从AI赋能到互构: 人工智能嵌入养老服务的逻辑、张力与路径[C]//江西省文化艺术发展促进会, 南昌理工学院. 第一届人工智能赋能新文科建设创新发展研讨会论文集(第二册). 2026: 256-259.
[11] 郭战龙. 人工智能养老服务决策中的伦理问题分析与协同治理路径[J]. 国际公关, 2025(15): 119-121.
[12] Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C. and Mullainathan, S. (2019) Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations. Science, 366, 447-453.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
[13] 周脂若, 杨芳. 伦理视域下智能化养老问题应遵循的原则及对策探究[J]. 锦州医科大学学报(社会科学版)11, 2023, 21(5): 14-20.