社区助老食堂的协同治理困境及其多元治理路径研究——以Y县社区助老食堂为例
Research on the Collaborative Governance Dilemma and Multiple Governance Paths of Community Elderly - Assisting Canteens: A Case Study of Community Elderly—Taking Community Elderly - Assisting Canteens in Y County as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/ar.2026.1310794, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 王丹嫒, 闫明明*:武汉科技大学法学与经济学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 社区助老食堂;协同治理;多元共治;治理困境;Community Elderly - Assisting Canteens; Collaborative Governance; Multi-Party Governance; Governance Challenges
摘要: 社区助老食堂是社区居家养老服务体系的一部分,旨在为老年人提供普惠的助餐服务,然而其在基层运行中存在协同治理形式化的问题。本文以协同治理理论为基础,构建目标、权责、信息、激励四维分析框架,通过对Y县社区助老食堂的调查发现,目标协同上各主体价值取向明显分化,缺少有效的整合机制;权责协同上纵向层级倒挂、横向部门割裂并存;信息协同上跨部门壁垒、纵向过滤造成决策偏离实际需求;激励协同上激励机制不健全削弱了各主体参与动力,最终使协同治理陷入形式化困境。因此本文提出应该从构建议事协商机制、优化纵向赋权和横向整合、搭建数字化信息平台、设计多层次激励相容机制四个方面协同推进,实现社区助老食堂从形式化协同走向实质性共治。
Abstract: Community elderly - assisting canteens are an integral part of the community-based home care service system. Their primary objective is to offer inclusive meal assistance services to the elderly. However, in the actual operation at the grassroots level, there exists the problem of formalized collaborative governance. Based on the theory of collaborative governance, this paper constructs a four-dimensional collaborative analysis framework encompassing goals, rights and responsibilities, information, and incentives. Through an investigation of community elderly - assisting canteens in County Y, it is found that in terms of goal collaboration, the value orientations of various subjects are significantly differentiated, and there is a lack of an effective integration mechanism; in terms of rights and responsibilities collaboration, there coexist the inversion of vertical levels and the fragmentation of horizontal departments; in terms of information collaboration, cross-departmental barriers and vertical filtering lead to decision-making deviating from actual needs; in terms of incentive collaboration, the imperfect incentive mechanism weakens the motivation of various subjects to participate, ultimately pushing collaborative governance into a formalized predicament. Therefore, this paper proposes that collaborative promotion should be carried out from four aspects: constructing a consultation and negotiation mechanism, optimizing vertical empowerment and horizontal integration, building a digital information platform, and designing a multi-level incentive-compatible mechanism, so as to enable community elderly - assisting canteens to move from formalized collaboration to substantial co-governance.
文章引用:王丹嫒, 闫明明. 社区助老食堂的协同治理困境及其多元治理路径研究——以Y县社区助老食堂为例[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(10): 576-583. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.1310794

参考文献

[1] 叶裕民. 中国县域城镇化与公共服务保障研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(4): 78-91.
[2] 白玫, 朱庆华. 老年用户智慧养老服务需求及志愿服务意愿影响因素分析——以武汉市江汉区为例[J]. 现代情报, 2018, 38(12): 3-8.
[3] 石昕颖, 王志中. 老龄化背景下社区食堂发展的问题与对策——以太原市社区食堂为例[J]. 西部学刊, 2024(5): 94-97.
[4] 林琳, 肖纬, 顾敏煜, 等. 广州长者饭堂供需匹配的类型、差异及调整思路[J]. 热带地理, 2022, 42(8): 1301-1313.
[5] 赫尔曼·哈肯. 协同学-自然成功的奥秘[M]. 上海: 上海科学普及出版社, 1988: 159-160.
[6] Mattessich, M. (1992) Collaboration What Makes It Work: A Review of Research Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, 1-57.
[7] Ansell, C. and Gash, A. (2007) Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
[8] Thomson, A.M. and Perry, J.L. (2006) Collaboration Processes: Inside the Black Box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20-32.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
[9] Provan, K.G. and Kenis, P. (2008) Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
[10] 吴春梅, 庄永琪. 协同治理: 关键变量、影响因素及实现途径[J]. 理论探索, 2013(3): 73-77.
[11] 国务院第七次全国人口普查领导小组办公室. 中国人口普查分县资料-2020 [M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022.