基于学情分析的工程伦理课程教学改革与创新实践
Teaching Reform and Innovative Practice of the Engineering Ethics Course Based on Learning Situation Analysis
摘要: 工程伦理教育是培养新时代卓越工程师的重要环节,但当前高校工程伦理课程普遍存在学情把握不准、教学方式与学生实际脱节等突出问题。本文以某地方高校机械工程学院硕士一年级学生为研究对象,通过问卷调查开展学情分析,并结合深度访谈与课程作业文本分析进行三角互证。课前调查发现,研究对象普遍存在工程伦理意识淡薄、职业价值观更侧重现实回报等特征。基于此,本文秉持“以文化人”理念,坚持以学生为中心,系统重构了工程伦理课程的教学目标与内容体系,创新了教学方法与思政融入路径,优化了课程考核方式。经过一学期的教学实践,问卷量化分析与质性分析结果共同显示,学生在职业价值观、工程伦理意识与责任担当认知等方面均发生显著正向转变,验证了教学设计的有效性,可为同类高校工程伦理课程改革提供借鉴。
Abstract: Engineering ethics education is an important part of cultivating outstanding engineers in the new era, but current engineering ethics courses in universities generally face prominent problems such as inaccurate understanding of students’ learning situations and a disconnect between teaching methods and students’ actual conditions. This study takes first-year master’s students in the School of Mechanical Engineering at a local university as the research subjects, conducts a learning situation analysis through a questionnaire survey, and triangulates the findings with in-depth interviews and textual analysis of course assignments. The pre-course survey found that the research subjects generally exhibited weak engineering ethics awareness and occupational values that placed greater emphasis on practical returns. On this basis, adhering to the concept of “educating people through culture” and a student-centered approach, this paper systematically reconstructed the teaching objectives and content system of the engineering ethics course, innovated teaching methods and pathways for integrating ideological and political education, and optimized the course assessment methods. After one semester of teaching practice, both quantitative questionnaire analysis and qualitative analysis showed that students underwent significant positive changes in occupational values, engineering ethics awareness, and the perception of responsibility, which verified the effectiveness of the instructional design and can provide reference for the reform of engineering ethics courses in similar universities.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
杨卫, 王孙禺, 吴小林, 等. 改革工科研究生教育着力培养卓越工程师[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2023(1): 1-15.
|
|
[2]
|
王行健, 韦怡彤, 马骏. 卓越工程师培养背景下工科生解决复杂工程问题能力评价指标体系研究[J]. 科教导刊, 2026(2): 1-7.
|
|
[3]
|
黄婷婷. 高校工程伦理教学困境与对策研究: 以N大学为例[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2023.
|
|
[4]
|
张明靓, 方召欣. 立德树人背景下工程伦理教育定位及实施策略探析[J]. 高教论坛, 2022(8): 50-53.
|
|
[5]
|
包家官, 王雨馨, 陈姝含. 以文化人的理论基础与实践路径探究[J]. 闽西职业技术学院学报, 2026, 28(2): 14-19.
|
|
[6]
|
让·皮亚杰. 发生认识论原理[M]. 王宪钿, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1981.
|
|
[7]
|
莱夫, 温格. 情境学习: 合法的边缘性参与[M]. 王文静, 译. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2004.
|
|
[8]
|
胡显燕, 王玉岚. 工程认证标准下进行工程伦理嵌入式教学改革[J]. 湖北第二师范学院学报, 2021, 38(8): 86-90.
|
|
[9]
|
赵文静. 交往异化与媒介赋能: 青年趣缘“搭子”社交行为研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 四川外国语大学, 2025.
|
|
[10]
|
耿力军, 张明. 天津海鸥反诉瑞士企业侵权获胜[J]. 中国发明与专利, 2011(9): 37.
|
|
[11]
|
丛杭青. 工程伦理[M]. 杭州: 浙江大学出版社, 2023.
|
|
[12]
|
教育部关于印发《高等学校课程思政建设指导纲要》的通知[EB/OL]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/202006/t20200603_462437.html, 2020-05-28.
|
|
[13]
|
Martin, M. and Schibbins, R. (2014) Ethics and the Conduct of Business. 7th Edition, Prentice Hall.
|
|
[14]
|
Magun-Jackson, S. (2004) A Psychological Model That Integrates Ethics in Engineering Education. Science & Engineering Ethics, 10, 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-004-0017-5
|