家庭结构变迁视域下传统养老模式的解构与重构研究
Research on the Deconstruction and Reconstruction of Traditional Elderly Support Modes from the Perspective of Family Structure Transition
摘要: 城镇化、低生育率与跨区域人口流动推动我国家庭结构现代化转型,传统多代共居大家庭逐步被小型化、空巢化、独居化家庭替代,依托子代赡养的传统家庭养老遭遇系统性冲击。传统“养儿防老”模式的空间载体、人力供给、经济支撑与孝道伦理持续弱化,难以匹配深度老龄化下专业化养老需求。本文以福利三角理论为核心分析框架,以家庭结构变迁为主线,分阶段梳理1949年以来我国家庭形态的阶段性演化特征,从养老载体、经济基础、伦理基础、需求结构四大维度系统剖析传统养老模式解构的内在机理。研究基于国家历次人口普查、民政部老龄事业统计公报等一手官方数据,结合城乡养老发展现实,构建家庭、社区、机构、市场协同联动,辅以现代孝道文化赋能的复合型养老重构路径。研究旨在完善新时代多元协同养老体系建设逻辑,为优化老龄公共政策、推进积极应对老龄化国家战略落地提供理论支撑与现实参考。
Abstract: Driven by urbanization, low fertility rates, and cross-regional population mobility, the family structure in China has undergone modern transformative changes. The traditional extended multi-generational co-residential families are gradually being replaced by smaller, empty-nest, and single-person households, which has brought systematic impacts on the traditional family pension model relying on children’s support. The traditional “raising children for old age” model has witnessed a continuous weakening in its spatial carrier, labor supply, economic support, and filial piety ethics, making it unable to meet the professional elderly care demands amid deep population aging. Taking the welfare triangle theory as the core analytical framework and the changes in family structure as the main thread, this paper sorts out the phased evolutionary characteristics of Chinese family forms since 1949, and systematically analyzes the internal mechanism of the deconstruction of the traditional pension model from four dimensions, namely pension carrier, economic foundation, ethical foundation, and demand structure. Based on first-hand official data from China’s national population censuses and the statistical bulletin on the cause of aging issued by the Ministry of Civil Affairs, combined with the practical development of urban and rural elderly care, this study constructs a compound pension reconstruction path featuring collaborative linkage of families, communities, institutions and markets, empowered by modern filial piety culture. The research provides theoretical support for improving aging-related public policies and advancing the National Strategy for Actively Responding to Population Aging.
文章引用:单玉梦. 家庭结构变迁视域下传统养老模式的解构与重构研究[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(10): 652-659. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.1310804

参考文献

[1] 陶涛, 金光照, 郭亚隆. 中国老年家庭空巢化态势与空巢老年群体基本特征[J]. 人口研究, 2023, 47(1): 58-71.
[2] 王跃生. 当代家庭户核心化、一代化和非家庭居住状况析论[J]. 中国特色社会主义研究, 2025(5): 60-76.
[3] 杨菊华, 何炤华. 社会转型过程中家庭的变迁与延续[J]. 人口研究, 2014, 38(2): 36-51.
[4] 黄健元, 常亚轻. 家庭养老功能弱化了吗?——基于经济与服务的双重考察[J]. 社会保障评论, 2020, 4(2): 131-145.
[5] 李永萍. “养儿防老”还是“以地养老”: 传统家庭养老模式分析[J]. 华南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(2): 103-112.
[6] 许琪. 传承与变迁: 当代中国家庭结构与家庭养老[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2023.
[7] 凌文豪. 从一元到多元: 中国农村养老模式的变迁逻辑——以生产社会化为分析视角[J]. 社会主义研究, 2011(6): 77-80.
[8] 班小辉, 丁怡涵. 论我国社区居家养老服务可持续发展的制度优化路径[J]. 社会治理, 2023(2): 92-103.
[9] 董克用, 王振振, 张栋. 中国人口老龄化与养老体系建设[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2020(1): 53-64.
[10] 钟涨宝, 李飞, 冯华超. “衰落”还是“未衰落”? 孝道在当代社会的自适应变迁[J]. 学习与实践, 2017(11): 89-97.
[11] 马侠. 中国家庭户规模和家庭结构分析[J]. 人口研究, 1984(3): 46-53.
[12] 王磊. 中国家庭结构变迁的特征趋势与问题研究——基于全国人口普查微观数据的分析[J]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 61(4): 140-151.
[13] 李永萍. “孝养分离”: 转型期农民孝道观念重构与养老模式优化[J]. 中国农村观察, 2025(5): 132-153.
[14] 黄石松, 胡清. 中国式居家养老: 本土特征、现实挑战与优化路径[J]. 中州学刊, 2026(2): 82-92.