姬塬油田吴433油藏长61亚段单砂体识别及刻画
Identification and Characterization of Single Sand Body in Chang 61 Submember of Wu 433 Reservoir in Jiyuan Oilfield
摘要: 姬塬油田吴433油藏属于鄂尔多斯盆地典型特低渗透油藏,目前已进入高含水开发阶段,受隔夹层分布复杂、单砂体识别精度不足制约,储层非均质性造成剩余油分布零散,制约油藏挖潜效果。以岩心、录井、测井资料为基础,开展沉积微相解析、隔夹层识别、单砂体划分,剖析砂体空间叠置接触关系与储层连通特征,形成单砂体精细刻画成果并指导现场开发调整。研究表明:研究区长61亚段属于三角洲前缘亚相,发育水下分流河道、河口坝、分流间湾沉积微相;依据隔夹层垂向、侧向识别标志,将长61亚段划分为11套单砂体;垂向砂体接触样式包含孤立式、侧叠式、叠加式,以叠加式占比最高;侧向发育分离式、对接式、侧切式,侧切式为主要接触类型;不同单砂体连通能力差异显著,长612-2-2单砂体连通率可达87.43%。基于砂体连通性认识,针对低连通井组实施重复压裂、暂堵压裂与暂堵酸化工艺,为高含水特低渗透油藏剩余油挖潜提供地质依据。
Abstract: Wu 433 reservoir in Jiyuan Oilfield is a typical ultra-low permeability reservoir in Ordos Basin. At present, it has entered the stage of high water cut development. Due to the complex distribution of interlayer and insufficient accuracy of single sand body identification, reservoir heterogeneity causes a scattered distribution of remaining oil, which restricts the potential tapping effect of the reservoir. Based on core, mud logging and logging data, sedimentary microfacies analysis, interlayer identification and single sand body division are carried out, and the spatial overlapping contact relationship of sand bodies and reservoir connectivity characteristics are analyzed, forming fine characterization results of single sand bodies and guiding field development and adjustment. The research shows that Chang 6 submember belongs to delta front subfacies, and the sedimentary microfacies of underwater distributary channel, estuary bar and distributary bay are developed. According to the vertical and lateral identification marks of interlayer, Chang 6 submember is divided into 11 sets of single sand bodies; Vertical sand body contact styles include isolated, side-stacked and superimposed, with superimposed accounting for the highest proportion; Lateral contact styles include separation, docking, lateral cutting, with lateral cutting as the main contact type; The connectivity of different single sand bodies is significantly different, and the connectivity of Chang 612-2-2 single sand body can reach 87.43%. Based on the understanding of sand body connectivity, the technologies of repeated fracturing, temporary plugging fracturing and temporary plugging acidification are implemented for low-connected well groups, which provide geological basis for tapping the potential of remaining oil in ultra-low permeability reservoirs with high water cut.
文章引用:黄嘉仪. 姬塬油田吴433油藏长61亚段单砂体识别及刻画[J]. 地球科学前沿, 2026, 16(10): 1553-1564. https://doi.org/10.12677/ag.2026.1610137

参考文献

[1] 付金华, 牛小兵, 淡卫东, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中生界延长组长7段页岩油地质特征及勘探开发进展[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(5): 601-614.
[2] 王红岩, 施振生, 孙莎莎, 等. 陆表海页岩沉积微相类型及微相分布模式——以川南地区五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(1): 51-64.
[3] 申锦江, 唐振兴, 王博涛, 等. 姬塬油田西部延长组长6段沉积特征及沉积模式[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 35(3): 1-9.
[4] 王爱民, 王朝, 张瑶瑶, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地靖边油田杨米涧地区长6致密油储集砂体特征及其主控因素[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2024, 50(3): 108-111.
[5] 邓杰. 吴起薛岔地区长6段储层的物性演化及其对油水分布的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2011.
[6] 罗仁泽, 李兴宇, 周洋, 等. 基于MC-ABiLSTM的储层单砂体智能识别方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37(3): 1112-1121.
[7] 张小安, 李仁国. 涠西南凹陷WA/B油田储层单砂体构型[J]. 中国石油大学胜利学院学报, 2022, 36(4): 37-44.
[8] 李兴宇. 靖安油田大路沟二区单砂体智能精细识别方法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2021.
[9] 武芳芳, 瞿璇, 周宁杰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地五蛟西地区长6段单砂体叠置特征研究[J]. 地质科学, 2024, 59(4): 1034-1047.
[10] 田正兰, 王凤琴. 瓦窑堡油田水晶沟区长2油层砂体叠置及其对注水开发的影响[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2023, 37(3): 76-81.
[11] 李玮, 刘瑛, 高涛, 等. 浅水三角洲前缘亚相背景下的单砂体刻画——以定边油田YGS区块长4+5油藏为例[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(5): 65-74+83.
[12] 马浪, 杜彦军, 张治东, 等. 安塞坪桥区延长组长9致密油储层预测及有利区优选[J]. 西北地质, 2022, 55(1): 216-224.
[13] 黄少伟, 陈璐, 陈晨, 等. 姬塬油田G83油藏单砂体刻画及动用技术研究[J]. 石油化工应用, 2023, 42(4): 96-98.
[14] 陈玲玲, 白景升, 陈凤来, 等. 姬塬油区北部长2油藏单砂体刻画及注水效果研究[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2024, 50(9): 97-100+121.
[15] 李金蔓, 霍宏博, 胡勇, 等. 特高含水期强非均质油藏剩余油研究新方法[J]. 辽宁石油化工大学学报, 2019, 39(6): 43-47.