乡村振兴背景下四川乡村学校撤并的政策逻辑、实施困境与优化策略
Policy Logic, Implementation Dilemmas, and Optimization Strategies for the Consolidation of Rural Schools in Sichuan under the Rural Revitalization Strategy
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2026.1410840, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 谢红雨:内江师范学院教育科学学院,四川 内江
关键词: 乡村振兴;四川;乡村学校撤并;布局调整;教育均衡;Rural Revitalization; Sichuan; Consolidation of Rural Schools; Layout Optimization; Educational Equity
摘要: 四川省自2019年启动乡镇行政区划和村级建制调整改革以来,乡村学校布局调整进入新一轮加速期。这一轮撤并政策既有国家层面推进义务教育优质均衡的战略考量,也有四川自身“两项改革”的适配逻辑。然而,在政策落地过程中,四川作为西部山区大省,面临着地理空间适配难、弱势群体保障不足、教育资源整合不畅、多元主体诉求失衡等现实困境。基于政策文本分析和四川多县域的实践考察,本文从分类施策的布局标准、全链条就学保障、深度融合的资源配置、多元协同的治理机制四个维度提出优化策略,以期为乡村振兴背景下民族地区和山区省份的乡村教育布局调整提供决策参考。
Abstract: Since the launch of the reform of township administrative division adjustments and village-level organizational restructuring in Sichuan Province in 2019, the spatial realignment of rural schools has entered a new phase of acceleration. This round of school consolidation policies is driven not only by the national strategic objective of advancing high-quality and equitable compulsory education, but also by the adaptive logic of Sichuan’s own “dual reform” initiative. However, during the implementation process, Sichuan, as a major mountainous province in western China, faces practical dilemmas including difficulties in geographic-spatial adaptation, inadequate protection of vulnerable groups, inefficient integration of educational resources, and imbalanced demands among multiple stakeholders. Based on policy text analysis and field investigations across multiple counties in Sichuan, this paper proposes optimization strategies from four dimensions: differentiated school layout standards, a full-chain guarantee for students’ access to schooling, deeply integrated resource allocation, and a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance mechanism, with the aim of providing decision-making references for the spatial adjustment of rural education in ethnic minority regions and mountainous provinces under the Rural Revitalization Strategy.
文章引用:谢红雨. 乡村振兴背景下四川乡村学校撤并的政策逻辑、实施困境与优化策略[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(10): 744-754. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.1410840

参考文献

[1] 王学男, 吴霓. 多重转型背景下乡村小规模学校的政策演进及其特征——基于国家与地方的政策文本互动[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 41(5): 180-190.
[2] 重塑乡村经济和治理格局——四川乡镇行政区划和村级建制调整改革调查[EB/OL].
https://www.sc.gov.cn/10462/10464/10797/2021/6/24/994bf7d83b474d7abb04cf7126239ae6.shtml, 2021-06-24.
[3] 教育统计队伍建设典型案例④丨四川省教育厅: 以高质量统计数据 服务教育高质量发展[EB/OL].
https://www.csdp.edu.cn/article/9674.html, 2024-10-08.
[4] 范先佐, 曾新. 农村中小学布局调整必须慎重处理的若干问题[J]. 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2008, 10(1): 7-12.
[5] 秦玉友. 农村学校布局调整评价研究[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2019.
[6] 雷望红. 乡村教育资源如何实现优化调整[EB/OL]. 中工网.
https://www.workercn.cn/c/2024-01-16/8115678.shtml, 2024-01-16.
[7] 平昌县“四个三”做实教育供给质量提升文章[EB/OL].
http://edu.sc.gov.cn/scedu/c100498/2021/8/11/250f951c108049caa111509b7e755136.shtml, 2021-08-11.
[8] 江安县“四化”并举抓好两项改革教育“后半篇”文章工作[EB/OL].
http://edu.sc.gov.cn/scedu/c100498/2021/12/30/c6bba020ec2149399d0727e023cf45a4.shtml, 2021-12-30.
[9] 杨永忠, 刘平. 南江县优化校点布局做好两项改革“后半篇”教育文章[N]. 四川科技报, 2021-10-13(003).
[10] 盐亭县统筹推进学校布局调整[EB/OL].
http://edu.sc.gov.cn/scedu/c100498/2022/2/23/ab68b954d9154511b2fdb4e73de7bc77.shtml, 2022-02-23.
[11] 南充市顺庆区盘活城乡教育资源激发教育内生动力[EB/OL].
http://edu.sc.gov.cn/scedu/c100498/2021/12/20/36f6ddf25a3a4e3ab4a2895d4d9d5bd8.shtml, 2021-12-20.
[12] 资阳市全力推进两项改革教育“后半篇”文章[EB/OL].
http://edu.sc.gov.cn/scedu/c100498/2022/1/10/54adacbbce674fb3872b999d630b8ec7.shtml, 2022-01-10.
[13] 赵利新, 曹晶瑞, 周博华, 等. 两会三人谈丨读书只为逃离家乡? 乡村教育要为孩子打好人生底色[EB/OL].
https://www.bjnews.com.cn/detail/167827171014056.html, 2023-03-08.
[14] 丁煌. 政策执行阻滞机制及其防治对策——一项基于行为和制度的分析[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018.
[15] 岳池县优化教育做好“两项改革”后半篇文章[EB/OL].
http://edu.sc.gov.cn/scedu/c100498/2021/4/20/140f67d07e3545ed8127d64e8be021c3.shtml, 2021-04-20.
[16] 李涛, 黄嘉欣. 学龄人口减少对乡村小规模学校发展的影响及其疏解——基于东北地区人口负增长省份的调查[J]. 教育研究, 2025, 46(5): 107-121.