波利亚解题思想下可视化技术赋能高中圆锥曲线动点最值问题的探究——以GeoGebra辅助解题为例
Visualizing Moving-Point Extrema on Conic Sections: A Pólya-Inspired Approach in High School Mathematics—A Case Study of GeoGebra-Assisted Problem Solving
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2026.1410845, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 冯瑞珍, 黄春丽*:广东外语外贸大学数学与统计学院,广东 广州;王加翠:大成岳家湾实验学校,浙江 杭州
关键词: 波利亚解题思想;GeoGebra;圆锥曲线;动点最值;Polya’s Problem Solving Framework; GeoGebra; Conic Curves; Moving Point Max-Min Problems
摘要: 《普通高中数学课程标准(2022版)》要求发展学生直观想象、逻辑推理、数学建模等核心素养。圆锥曲线是高考高频考点,试题难度系数0.3~0.4,区分度较好,动点最值问题是学生学习的主要难点。受静态习题呈现形式限制,学生难以想象点、线的动态变化,解题过程易出现思维卡顿与畏难情绪。本文以波利亚解题表的“理解题意、拟订方案、执行计划、回顾反思”四阶段为框架,结合GeoGebra可视化平台,选取椭圆双动点最值问题开展教学案例研究,落实“观察–猜想–验证”的探究过程。借助软件轨迹、滑动条、动画演示功能直观呈现几何关系,先通过可视化提出几何猜想,再完成严格数理证明,并通过变式探究提炼圆锥曲线与定圆联动最值问题的一般规律。教学实践表明,将GeoGebra融入波利亚解题流程,能够降低学生认知负荷,培养动态几何思维,落实数学核心素养。
Abstract: The General Senior High School Mathematics Curriculum Standards (2022 Edition) calls for developing students’ core competencies, including intuitive imagination, logical reasoning, and mathematical modeling. Conic sections are a frequent topic in the college entrance examination, with a difficulty coefficient ranging from 0.3 to 0.4 and a good degree of discrimination. The problem of finding the maximum or minimum values of moving points is the main difficulty for students. Due to the limitations of the static presentation form of exercises, students find it difficult to imagine the dynamic changes of points and lines, and the problem-solving process is prone to thinking blockages and feelings of difficulty. This article takes the four stages of “understanding the problem, formulating a plan, executing the plan, and reviewing and reflecting” from Polya’s problem-solving table as the framework, combines the GeoGebra visualization platform, selects the problem of the maximum or minimum values of the double moving points of an ellipse for teaching case research, and implements the “observation-conjecture-verification” exploration process. The article uses the software’s trajectory, slider, and animation demonstration functions to present geometric relationships intuitively. First, it proposes a geometric conjecture through visualization, then completes a strict mathematical proof, and through variations, refines the general rules of the linkage maximum or minimum value problem of conic sections and fixed circles. Teaching practice shows that integrating GeoGebra into Polya’s problem-solving process can reduce students’ cognitive load, cultivate dynamic geometric thinking, and implement core mathematical literacy.
文章引用:冯瑞珍, 黄春丽, 王加翠. 波利亚解题思想下可视化技术赋能高中圆锥曲线动点最值问题的探究——以GeoGebra辅助解题为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(10): 791-800. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.1410845

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 义务教育数学课程标准(2022年版) [M]. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社, 2022.
[2] 郭衎, 曹一鸣. 动态数学软件GeoGebra使用指南[J]. 中学数学教学参考(上旬), 2012(1): 129-131.
[3] 波利亚. 怎样解题: 数学思维的新方法[M]. 涂泓, 冯承天, 译. 上海: 上海科技教育出版社, 2018.
[4] 陈汉君, 时丽霞, 王信林. 波利亚数学教育思想研究综述[J]. 数学通讯, 2004(9): 1-4.
[5] 罗增儒. 数学解题学引论[M]. 西安: 陕西师范大学出版社, 2000: 125-360.
[6] Schoenfeld, 韩斌. 纪念波利亚《怎样解题》中文版60周年[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版), 2009(5): 599-603+609.
[7] Passmore, T. (2007) Polya’s Legacy: Fully Forgotten or Getting a New Perspective in Theory and Practice? Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 21, 44-53.
[8] 向引. 信息技术条件下的高中数学实验教学[J]. 数学学习与研究, 2021(18): 16-17.
[9] 何威, 关恩. GeoGebra辅助立体几何教学案例与模型剖析[J]. 中学数学研究(华南师范大学版), 2020(14): 53+1-2.
[10] 王永, 刘菲菲. 用GeoGebra的3D功能解一道高考立体几何题[J]. 中学数学月刊, 2020(2): 48.
[11] 赵意扬, 李鑫, 许笛. 基于GeoGebra的高中数学圆锥曲线概念生成教学研究[J]. 中小学数学(高中版), 2026(3): 59-61.
[12] 王海亮. 信息技术赋能椭圆概念可视化教学的实践与反思[J]. 中学数学教学参考, 2026(19): 73-75.
[13] 闫伟. 基于GeoGebra平台的可视化探究教学——以2024年高考全国甲卷理科数学第21题为例[J]. 实验教学与仪器, 2025, 42(8): 133-135+138.
[14] 马广宇. 基于GeoGebra的圆锥曲线变式教学研究[J]. 数学之友, 2025(15): 75-77+80.
[15] 洪凯. 基于GeoGebra平台对椭圆经典试题的多维探究与推广[J]. 中学数学研究, 2026(3): 25-30.