社会工作介入亲密关系暴力的伦理议题——基于生态系统理论和与Reamer伦理决策模型的分析
Ethical Issues of Social Work Intervention in Intimate Partner Violence—An Analysis Based on Ecological Systems Theory and Reamer’s Ethical Decision-Making Model
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.1510884, PDF,   
作者: 李怡婷:浙江工商大学公共管理学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: 亲密关系暴力;伦理困境;社会工作;Intimate Partner Violence; Ethical Dilemmas; Social Work
摘要: 亲密关系暴力具有隐蔽性、持续性和复杂性,社会工作者在介入过程中常面临案主利益与案主自决权之间的伦理冲突。本文基于生态系统理论,从个人、家庭、社会及制度等层面分析影响案主选择的多重因素,并运用Reamer伦理决策模型探讨社会工作者的伦理判断过程。研究认为,应在尊重案主自决的基础上兼顾其人身安全与现实福祉,通过风险评估、资源支持、专业督导及多主体协作等方式,明确保护性介入边界,拓展案主实际选择空间,实现伦理原则与专业实践的平衡。
Abstract: Intimate partner violence is characterized by concealment, persistence, and complexity, often placing social workers in ethical dilemmas between clients’ interests and their right to self-determination during intervention. Based on the ecosystem theory, this article analyzes multiple factors influencing clients’ choices at individual, family, societal, and institutional levels, and applies Reamer’s ethical decision-making model to examine social workers’ ethical reasoning processes. The study argues that while respecting clients’ autonomy, social workers should also safeguard their physical safety and practical well-being. By employing risk assessment, resource support, professional supervision, and multi-stakeholder collaboration, protective intervention boundaries can be clarified, clients’ actual choice options expanded, and a balance achieved between ethical principles and professional practice.
文章引用:李怡婷. 社会工作介入亲密关系暴力的伦理议题——基于生态系统理论和与Reamer伦理决策模型的分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(10): 657-664. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.1510884

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国反家庭暴力法[EB/OL].
https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2015-12/28/content_5029898.htm, 2015-12-28.
[2] 《广东省实施<中华人民共和国反家庭暴力法>办法》全票表决通过[EB/OL].
https://www.gdwomen.org.cn/yw/content/post_298387.html, 2020-07-31.
[3] 当打媳妇被归为“家务事”,农村女性逃离家暴有多难?[EB/OL].
https://news.cnr.cn/native/gd/20251202/t20251202_527447668.shtml, 2025-12-04.
[4] 第四期中国妇女社会地位调查主要数据情况[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2022(1): 1, 129.
[5] Shen, H. and Xie, Y. (2025) Trends of Domestic Violence against Women in China: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1608189.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1608189
[6] 林佳敏, 潘仁, 陈子恒, 等. 已婚女性农民工亲密伴侣暴力的现状及影响因素研究[J]. 科教文汇(中旬刊), 2019(17): 190-192.
[7] 关于离婚案件中人身安全保护令适用的调研报告[EB/OL].
http://huangping.guizhoucourt.gov.cn/dybg/296554.jhtml, 2025-07-25.
[8] 栾晓. 社会工作实务中的价值中立与价值介入[J]. 长沙民政职业技术学院学报, 2017, 24(1): 5-7.
[9] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977) Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.32.7.513
[10] 吴帆, 温腾龙, 菅苗. 社会工作干预家庭暴力的社会性别视角: 归因模式与行动框架[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2023(2): 65-79.
[11] 袁芮. 社会工作介入婚姻暴力中的伦理议题——以案主自决和保密原则为例[J]. 伦理学研究, 2016(3): 104-110.
[12] 文颖慧. 社会工作实务中保密原则的伦理困境及其决策研究[J]. 中国社会工作, 2018(25): 30-32.
[13] 王川兰, 曹英君. 张力中的平衡: 社会工作伦理的理论整合与实践应用[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 40(1): 11-25.
[14] Reamer, F.G. (2021) Social Work Values and Ethics. Columbia University Press.
[15] McCarthy, L.P., Imboden, R., Shdaimah, C.S. and Forrester, P. (2020) ‘Ethics Are Messy’: Supervision as a Tool to Help Social Workers Manage Ethical Challenges. Ethics and Social Welfare, 14, 118-134.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2020.1720265
[16] 杨双, 胡爱萍, 向明芳. 亲密伴侣暴力评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(31): 3965-3970.