互联网使用、线上社群嵌入与社会距离——基于CSS2021的实证研究
Internet Use, Online Community Embeddedness and Social Distance—An Empirical Study Based on CSS2021
摘要: 社会距离是衡量社会融合与社会心态的重要指标,互联网能否缩小群体间的社会距离,关系到数字社会建设的实际成效。本文基于2021年中国社会状况综合调查(CSS)数据,构建了一个“互联网使用–线上社群嵌入–社会距离”的分析框架,旨在探究互联网使用对居民社会接纳度的影响及其内在机制。研究发现:1) 互联网的使用能显著提升社会接纳度,表明“使用鸿沟”比“接入鸿沟”更关键。2) 线上社群嵌入扮演了双向的竞争性中介角色:桥接型社群通过促进跨群体接触,产生正向间接效应,缩小社会距离;而黏合型社群则通过强化内群体认同,产生负向间接效应,扩大社会距离。3) 线下社会参与对线上互动具有正向调节作用,能够放大桥接型社群的积极效应,构成一个有调节的中介模型。4) 社会接纳的效果存在维度分化,信息型使用主要增进对处境不利群体的接纳,而娱乐型与工具型使用则主要增进对生活方式多样性的接纳。研究结论为推动数字包容、优化网络生态提供了实证依据。
Abstract: Social distance is an important indicator of social integration and social mentality. Whether the Internet can narrow social distance between groups bears on the effectiveness of building a digital society. Using data from the 2021 Chinese Social Survey (CSS), this study constructs an analytical framework of “Internet use - online community embeddedness - social distance” to examine how Internet use affects residents’ social acceptance and through what mechanisms. Results indicate that: 1) Internet use significantly enhances social acceptance, suggesting that the “usage divide” is more critical than the “access divide”. 2) Online community embeddedness plays a competing mediating role in opposite directions: bridging communities reduces social distance by facilitating intergroup contact, whereas bonding communities increase it by reinforcing in-group identification. 3) Offline social participation positively moderates online interaction, amplifying the bridging effect and forming a moderated mediation model. 4) Furthermore, the effects vary by dimension: informational use mainly promotes acceptance of disadvantaged groups, while entertainment and instrumental use mainly promotes acceptance of lifestyle diversity. These findings provide empirical evidence for advancing digital inclusion and optimizing the online ecosystem.
文章引用:陈虹妃, 陈永进, 梁展硕, 孙佳琦. 互联网使用、线上社群嵌入与社会距离——基于CSS2021的实证研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(10): 681-690. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.1510887

参考文献

[1] Park, R.E. (1924) The Concept of Social Distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 8, 339-344.
[2] Bogardus, E.S. (1933) A Social Distance Scale. Sociology and Social Research, 17, 265-271.
[3] 赵荣江, 牛雅娟, 杨少杰, 等. 中国北方城乡两地居民对10种特殊人群社会距离及社交限制的调查[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2015, 41(7): 395-400.
[4] 王开庆, 刘林平. 群际交往、人际信任与社会距离——城市居民与农民工的群际关系研究[J]. 云南大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 14(4): 87-96.
[5] Pettigrew, T.F. and Tropp, L.R. (2006) A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
[6] Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
[7] Hargittai, E. and Hinnant, A. (2008) Digital Inequality: Differences in Young Adults’ Use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35, 602-621.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208321782
[8] 许加彪, 李欣. 群际接触理论视角下互联网使用对居民国家认同感的影响机制——基于CSS 2021的实证分析[J]. 民族学刊, 2025, 16(4): 59-68.
[9] 许庆红, 丁定芹, 黄小丽. 间接群际接触对缅甸与中美日印民众社会距离的影响——来自2019年缅甸综合社会调查(MGSS)的微观证据[J]. 中国研究, 2022(2): 103-126.
[10] Wright, S.C., Aron, A., McLaughlin-Volpe, T. and Ropp, S.A. (1997) The Extended Contact Effect: Knowledge of Cross-Group Friendships and Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
[11] Pettigrew, T.F. and Tropp, L.R. (2008) How Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice? Meta‐analytic Tests of Three Mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504
[12] 陈言, 王希, 杨友才. 互联网使用和社交网站兴起对社会资本影响: 研究进展与未来展望[J]. 制度经济学研究, 2021(4): 233-260.
[13] 卜卫, 任娟. 超越“数字鸿沟”: 发展具有社会包容性的数字素养教育[J]. 新闻与写作, 2020(10): 30-38.
[14] 施颖婕, 季诗雨, 张涛甫. 作为不平等再生产闭环的数字鸿沟及其情境差异——基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的交叉滞后分析[J]. 新闻与传播研究, 2025, 32(8): 48-63.
[15] Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. (2007) The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
[16] 姜俊丰. 互联网使用增加了个人社会资本吗? 一个“工具-表达”价值的二元视角[J]. 社会发展研究, 2023(4): 103-125.
[17] 马国栋, 林馨, 杨胜慧, 等. 赋能与分化: 互联网使用对农民工新型社会资本的影响研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2024, 31(4): 90-98.
[18] Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J. and Hampton, K. (2001) Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 436-455.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121957286
[19] 张敏, 邴丕敬, 袁可. 互联网使用与劳动者就业质量: 线上和线下社会资本的双重视角[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2024, 41(5): 110-124.
[20] 程新峰, 李晓敏, 葛廷帅. 线上社会参与对“老漂族”社会适应的影响——基于社会支持的中介作用[J]. 人口学刊, 2026, 48(3): 115-128.