养老产业与养老金融产融协同模式及保障机制
Industry-Finance Synergy Mode and Guarantee Mechanism of Elderly Care Industry and Pension Finance
摘要: 深度老龄化背景下,我国养老产业快速扩容但面临供需错配、融资梗阻等结构性矛盾。养老产业长周期、重投入、轻资产、慢回报的特征与传统银行短期信贷模式存在天然冲突,养老金融亦存在产品同质化、场景嵌入不足等问题。本文构建“供需匹配–价值共创–风险共担”三维分析模型,系统剖析养老产业与金融融合发展的内在机理与现实障碍。研究针对机构养老、居家社区养老、智慧养老等细分场景,提出保险 + 养老社区闭环、养老REITs存量盘活、居家养老消费金融嵌入、智慧养老股权赋能四类差异化产融协同模式。从政策激励、行业基建、监管容错三维度构建保障机制,打通市场、信息与制度壁垒,实现资本禀赋与场景禀赋的双向赋能,为破解养老融资难题、推动银发经济升级提供理论与实践参考。
Abstract: Amid deepening population aging, China’s eldercare industry is expanding rapidly yet confronting structural contradictions including supply-demand mismatch and financing bottlenecks. The industry’s inherent characteristics—long investment horizons, heavy capital requirements, asset-light operations, and slow returns—create fundamental tensions with conventional banking models predicated on short-term lending and collateral-heavy structures, while eldercare finance suffers from product homogenization and insufficient scenario integration. This paper constructs a three-dimensional analytical framework of “supply-demand alignment, value co-creation, and risk-sharing” to systematically examine the endogenous mechanisms and practical barriers governing the convergence of eldercare industries and financial services. Tailored to differentiated scenarios encompassing institutional care, home- and community-based eldercare, and smart eldercare, the study proposes four distinct industry-finance synergy models: insurance-eldercare community closed-loop operations, eldercare REITs for inventory revitalization, consumer finance integration in home-based eldercare scenarios, and equity empowerment in smart eldercare. The research identifies maturity mismatch, scenario mismatch, and risk mismatch as core constraints, with imperfect asset, absent valuation standards, and fragmented cross-sectoral regulation constituting deep-seated institutional barriers. Accordingly, the paper establishes a comprehensive safeguard mechanism spanning policy incentives, industry infrastructure, and regulatory forbearance to dismantle market, information, and institutional barriers, thereby enabling bidirectional empowerment between financial capital endowments and industrial scenario endowments—offering theoretical grounding and practical reference for resolving eldercare financing dilemmas and advancing high-quality silver economy development.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
陆岷峰. 智能赋能、价值共创与包容性增长——普惠性养老金融与家庭金融的协同机制与路径[J/OL]. 科技智囊: 1-20. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/11.3538.g3.20260617.1112.003, 2026-06-17.
|
|
[2]
|
农发行重庆市分行课题组. 支持养老金融发展的路径探索与实践策略[J]. 农业发展与金融, 2026(5): 37-42.
|
|
[3]
|
O’Neill, N. and Mercille, J. (2025) Private Equity Investment in Long-Term Care: The Case of Ireland. Health Policy, 159, Article ID: 105378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105378
|
|
[4]
|
Na, L., Zesheng, L. and Tong, P. (2025) Financing Pathways for the Ageing Industry: Mitigating Risks in Older Adult Care Investment. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, Article 1642978. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1642978
|
|
[5]
|
董克用, 施文凯. 中国养老金融的构成逻辑和发展路径[J]. 现代金融导刊, 2024(11): 10-13.
|
|
[6]
|
鲁筱, 叶剑平. 养老金融与养老REITs发展: 机遇、困境与协同路径[J]. 当代经济管理, 2026, 48(2): 83-88.
|
|
[7]
|
方国斌. 险资布局养老社区: 重资产之痛与轻资产之思[J]. 上海保险, 2025(7): 12-19.
|
|
[8]
|
胡继晔. 全生命周期养老金融[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2023: 328.
|
|
[9]
|
董克用, 林佳钰, 张栋. 构建中国特色养老金体系[J]. 中国金融, 2024(12): 49-51.
|
|
[10]
|
姚前. 社区养老服务体系构建策略研究[J]. 现代营销, 2026(18): 166-168.
|
|
[11]
|
黄佳音. 乡村振兴背景下农村养老服务体系的治理困境及优化路径研究[J]. 西部财会, 2026(6): 64-67.
|
|
[12]
|
王巧慧, 靳宗振, 张楠, 等. 标准化助推居家养老服务高质量发展——以北京市巡视探访标准体系建设为例[J]. 标准科学, 2026(4): 43-48.
|
|
[13]
|
张瑾. 智慧养老服务协同体系构建与效能升级[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2026(7): 92-101.
|
|
[14]
|
王海洋. 养老服务监管整全性立法的体系展开[J]. 法治社会, 2024(6): 77-86.
|