马克思主义劳动价值论视域下银发经济的发展逻辑与路径优化——基于养老服务业的理论对话与实证考察
Development Logic and Path Optimization of the “Silver Economy” from the Perspective of Marxist Labor Theory of Value—A Theoretical Dialogue and Empirical Investigation Based on the Elderly Care Service Industry
摘要: 随着我国人口老龄化进程的加快,银发经济正成为推动经济高质量发展的重要新引擎。马克思主义劳动价值论作为揭示商品经济运行规律的科学理论,为探析银发经济的发展逻辑提供了重要的分析工具。本文在系统梳理国内外银发经济研究主要流派的基础上,以马克思主义劳动价值论为视角,以养老服务业为具体切入点,深入探讨了劳动价值论在这一特殊领域的适用性边界与理论修正。养老服务业中普遍存在的情感劳动与非物质劳动,对社会必要劳动时间的衡量构成挑战,却也进一步凸显了活劳动作为价值唯一源泉的不可替代性。通过与人力资本理论的比较分析,本文认为劳动价值论的独特洞见在于揭示了照护劳动“高技能、低回报”现象背后价值创造与价值分配的社会矛盾。研究结合低龄老年劳动参与率、银发市场规模等统计数据,对泰康之家、南京互助“时间银行”等典型案例进行剖析,指出当前银发经济发展中存在老年劳动参与率持续走低、产品供需错配、市场机制不完善、劳动权益保障不足等问题。为此,应从构建“老年技能价值评估与再开发体系”、优化产品供给、完善市场体系、建立“时间银行与社区服务价值转换机制”四个维度协同发力,将“尊重活劳动价值”的核心理念转化为可操作的政策工具,把老龄化压力转化为“长寿红利”。
Abstract: With the acceleration of population aging in China, the silver economy is becoming an important new engine for high-quality economic development. As a scientific theory revealing the operating laws of the commodity economy, the Marxist labor theory of value provides an important analytical tool. Based on a systematic review of the major research schools on the silver economy at home and abroad, this paper takes the elderly care service industry as a specific entry point and explores the applicability boundary and theoretical revision of the labor theory of value in this special field. The emotional labor and immaterial labor prevalent in the elderly care service industry challenge the measurement of socially necessary labor time, yet further highlight the irreplaceability of living labor as the sole source of value. Through a comparative analysis with human capital theory, this paper argues that the unique insight of the labor theory of value lies in revealing the social contradiction between value creation and value distribution behind the “high-skill, low-return” phenomenon of care labor. Drawing on statistical data such as the labor participation rate of the young-old and the scale of the silver market, and conducting anatomical analyses of typical cases such as Taikang Home and the Nanjing mutual-aid “Time Bank”, the study identifies problems including the continuously declining elderly labor participation rate, the mismatch between product supply and demand, an imperfect market mechanism, and insufficient protection of labor rights. Accordingly, coordinated efforts should be made in four dimensions—building an “elderly skill value assessment and redevelopment system”, optimizing product supply, improving the market system, and establishing a “time bank and community service value conversion mechanism”—so as to transform the core idea of “respecting the value of living labor” into operable policy tools and turn the pressure of aging into a “longevity dividend”.
文章引用:袁驰. 马克思主义劳动价值论视域下银发经济的发展逻辑与路径优化——基于养老服务业的理论对话与实证考察[J]. 老龄化研究, 2026, 13(10): 722-730. https://doi.org/10.12677/ar.2026.1310813

参考文献

[1] OECD (2014) The Silver Economy as a Pathway for Growth. OECD Publishing.
[2] European Commission (2018) The Silver Economy: Final Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
[3] International Monetary Fund (2025) Chapter 2. The Rise of the Silver Economy: Global Implications of Population Aging. In: World Economic Outlook, IMF, 1-26.
[4] 韩鹏. 关于老年人收入的政治经济学分析[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2018(11): 88-95.
[5] 马克思. 资本论: 第一卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2001: 47-57.
[6] Hochschild, A.R. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.
[7] 奈格里, 哈特. 帝国——全球化的政治秩序[M]. 杨建国, 范一亭, 译. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2008.
[8] 陈飞. 非物质劳动的生命政治解读——基于马克思立场对哈特和奈格里观点的批判性反思[J]. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 50(5): 128-139.
[9] 梅笑, 涂炯. 效率与温情: 大病照护中的情感劳动何以可能[J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2021(3): 53-67.
[10] 舒尔茨. 论人力资本投资[M]. 北京: 北京经济学院出版社, 1990.
[11] Becker, G.S. (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Columbia University Press.
[12] 马克思. 1857-1858年经济学手稿[M]//马克思恩格斯全集: 第30卷. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 331.
[13] 文文, 顾成敏. 数字新质生产力赋能银发经济高质量发展: 理论机制与实证检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2025, 41(22): 55-60.
[14] 宋月萍, 张光赢, 彭可余. 中国低龄老年人劳动参与的现状、特征及趋势[J]. 人口研究, 2024, 48(2): 75-89.
[15] 国家信息中心. 中国银发经济发展报告(2024) [R]. 北京: 国家信息中心, 2024.
[16] 徐倩. 发展型社会政策与社会养老服务之逻辑契合性辨析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2017(4): 48-56.
[17] 中国老龄科学研究中心. 中国养老产业发展报告[R]. 北京: 科学文献出版社, 2024.
[18] 梁淑雯, 李录堂. 低龄老年人力资源再开发方式探究——基于中国老年社会调查数据[J]. 理论导刊, 2018(2): 78-84.
[19] 郑爱文. 基于异质性视角的低龄高智老年人力资源开发利用探析[J]. 北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(4): 128-134.
[20] 李晓天. 养老金融支持银发经济高质量发展的内在逻辑及路径[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2025(2): 152-160.
[21] 杨康, 沈苏燕, 李放. 农村“时间银行”互助养老困境及其价值实现路径——基于“结构-行动”分析框架的探索[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 22(6): 102-111.
[22] 李俏, 刘亚琪. 农村互助养老的历史演进、实践模式与发展走向[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(5): 72-78.
[23] 陈友华, 施旖旎. 时间银行: 推进养老服务还是增进广义互惠[J]. 阅江学刊, 2024, 16(1): 139-146+175.