从柳江盆地前陆剖面平衡看“吴庄背斜”和“柳江向斜”的构造属性
Tectonic Attributes of the “Wuzhuang Anticline” and the “Liujiang Syncline” from Balanced Foreland Sections in the Liujiang Basin
DOI: 10.12677/ojns.2026.146080, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 关成尧*, 白相东, 刘晓燕, 袁四化:应急管理大学地震科学与技术学院构造物理与岩石摩擦学实验室,河北 廊坊;河北省地震动力学重点实验室,河北 廊坊;伦 畅:中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京;赵国春#:中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院,北京
关键词: 柳江盆地;前陆盆地;构造属性;堆垛构造;演化;Liujiang Basin; Foreland Basin; Tectonic Attribute; Stacking Structure; Evolution
摘要: 根据柳江盆地典型剖面的演化平衡剖面(剥蚀)恢复,认为柳江盆地可以分为西部冲段带系统、中部覆盖区系统、东部非覆盖系统三个区域性构造带,其中的西部冲段带系统可以在分为四个三级构造带。推覆褶皱区的形态整体上属于“断弯褶皱”,上部外来地体的覆盖范围达到5 km以上,覆盖了柳江向斜的大部分地域,经历大规模的覆盖、压陷及剥蚀后形成现代残留结构。柳江盆地西部的整体结构的核心属性应该是冲断带,是坡坪式构造的外来地块断弯褶皱作用的结果,西部冲断带分为寒武纪远程抬升系统、奥陶纪直立系统、石炭纪二叠纪冲断楔形系统三个部分构成。整体性的“宏观褶皱”属于断层相关褶皱。在冲断带的最西部存在向西倾斜的断阶导致了地层的系统性向西陷落和倾斜,形成和背斜体系的“地层向西变新”的整体性格局。黑山窑路线可以认为属于前陆压陷盆地结构中柳江单斜的“缩影”,反映呈现逐渐向西加强的压陷作用,柳江盆地的核心凹陷从属性上不是向斜凹陷,不属于和吴庄背斜共同组成的“背斜–向斜”组合型盆地,而是前陆压陷(单斜)凹陷,可称为“柳江单斜”。
Abstract: Based on the evolution equilibrium profile (erosion) restoration of the typical section of the Liujiang Basin, it is believed that the Liujiang Basin can be divided into three regional structural belts: the western erosion section system, the central coverage area system, and the eastern non-coverage system. Among them, the western erosion section system can be further divided into four tertiary structural belts. The morphology of the erosion fault zone is generally of the “fault-bend fold” type. The coverage range of the upper allochthonous terrane reaches more than 5 km, covering most of the area of the Liujiang syncline. After undergoing large-scale coverage, subsidence, and erosion, it forms the modern residual structure. The overall structure of the western part of the Liujiang Basin should be an erosion fault zone, which is the result of fault-bend folding of an allochthonous block in a ramp-flat structure. The western erosion fault zone is composed of three parts: the Cambrian long-distance uplift system, the Ordovician upright system, and the Carboniferous-Permian erosion wedge system. The overall “macroscopic fold” belongs to the fault-related fold structures. At the westernmost part of the erosion fault zone, there is a westward-sloping fault step, causing the systematic westward subsidence and inclination of the strata, forming an overall pattern of “strata becoming younger westward” in the anticline system. The Heishanyao route can be regarded as the “snapshot” of the Liujiang single anticline in the foreland subsidence basin structure, reflecting the gradually strengthening subsidence effect moving westward. The core depression of the Liujiang Basin is not an anticline depression in terms of its attribute, and does not belong to the “anticline-syncline” combined basin formed together with the Wu Zhuang Anticline, but is a foreland subsidence (single anticline) depression, which can be called “Liujiang Single Anticline”.
文章引用:关成尧, 伦畅, 赵国春, 白相东, 刘晓燕, 袁四化. 从柳江盆地前陆剖面平衡看“吴庄背斜”和“柳江向斜”的构造属性[J]. 自然科学, 2026, 14(6): 762-770. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojns.2026.146080

参考文献

[1] 牛平山, 郭玉华. 建立柳江盆地地质遗迹自然保护区之管见[J]. 石家庄经济学院学报, 1998(4): 362-366.
[2] 姚玉君. 柳江盆地构造地貌的内应力分析[J]. 天津师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1996(2): 61-63.
[3] 郝素琴, 曲以秀, 杨洪英. 柳江火山-构造盆地的特征及演化[J]. 沈阳黄全学院学报, 1997, 16(1): 16-22.
[4] 刘锡文. 从秦皇岛柳江盆地岩浆活动论其大地构造性质及成矿特征[J]. 唐山工程技术学院学报, 1995(1): 76-79.
[5] 马良. 柳江盆地内岩浆侵入活动对煤层煤质的影响[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(8): 226-234.
[6] 王海军. 柳江盆地岩浆活动对主力煤田水文地质特征的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(5): 1670-1684.
[7] 冯诗海, 李红, 蒋佳俊, 等. 华北秦皇岛地区柳江盆地马家沟组碳酸盐岩多期白云化作用[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(4): 664-680.
[8] 刘书燕, 孙浩元, 胡烁, 等. 柳江盆地本溪组铁质鲕粒粉砂岩特征及成因[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(27): 11547-11557.
[9] 赵汇珍, 陈勇, 涂聪, 等. 柳江盆地髫髻山组凝灰岩地球化学与熔体包裹体水含量特征[J]. 岩矿测试, 2025, 44(1): 88-101.
[10] 关成尧, 肖雨, 白相东, 等. 中国河北柳江盆地西部构造演化及前陆盆地规律研究[J]. 自然科学, 2025, 13(5): 986-993.
[11] 林建平, 赵国春, 程捷, 等. 北戴河地质认识实习指导书[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005.
[12] 柳成志, 马凤荣. 北戴河地区地质实习指导书[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2006.
[13] 王青春. 秦皇岛地质认识实习教程[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010.
[14] 邵先杰, 褚庆忠, 马平华, 等. 秦皇岛地质实习指导书[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2018.
[15] 李越, 季建清, 涂继耀, 等. 燕山东部柳江地区构造属性新解与郯庐断裂系活动[J]. 岩石学报, 2009, 25(3): 675-681.
[16] 任学义, 刘强, 齐云飞. 柳江盆地西翼含煤岩系特征及构造控煤作用研究[J]. 中国锰业, 2017, 35(3): 27-39, 57.
[17] 边惠惠. 秦皇岛柳江地区中生代构造变形及其演化[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2021.
[18] Biot, M.A. (1957) Folding Instability of a Layered Viscoelastic Medium under Compression. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 242, 444-454.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1957.0187
[19] Ramberg, H. (1963) Fluid Dynamics of Viscous Buckling Applicable to Folding of Layered Rocks. AAPG Bulletin, 47, 484-505.
https://doi.org/10.1306/bc743a5b-16be-11d7-8645000102c1865d
[20] 关成尧, 白相东, 刘晓燕, 等. 柳江盆地西部吴庄背斜巨型角砾区的揭层逆冲滑脱及伸展垮塌[J]. 自然科学, 2025, 13(5): 1004-1010.