城市快速路横断面案例的聚类识别与关联规则挖掘研究
Clustering Identification and Association Rule Mining of Urban Expressway Cross-Section Cases
DOI: 10.12677/hjdm.2027.171001, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 朱 敏:萍乡学院工程与管理学院,江西 萍乡;萍乡市海绵城市工程技术研究中心,江西 萍乡;许璐瑶:萍乡学院工程与管理学院,江西 萍乡;张财喜:萍乡市工程咨询管理顾问有限责任公司,江西 萍乡
关键词: 城市快速路更新;横断面案例;聚类分析;关联规则;工程知识发现;数据挖掘;Urban Expressway Renewal; Cross-Section Cases; Cluster Analysis; Association Rules; Engineering Knowledge Discovery; Data Mining
摘要: 针对城市快速路更新案例信息分散、工程规律难以提取的问题,本文对横断面案例进行聚类和关联规则挖掘,并利用快速路交通数据验证车道配置规律。结果表明,横断面案例可划分为5类典型模式,综合轮廓系数为0.534;地面辅道与非机动车道、高架主线和25~35 m横断面宽度之间存在较稳定的关联关系;交通量增加时,8车道和10车道方案的比例明显提高。研究结果可为快速路更新案例整理和初步方案分析提供参考。
Abstract: Urban expressway renewal cases are characterized by scattered information and difficulty in extracting engineering regularities. To address these issues, this study conducts clustering and association rule mining on cross-section cases and validates lane configuration patterns using expressway traffic data. The results show that the cross-section cases can be classified into five typical patterns, with an overall silhouette coefficient of 0.534. Relatively stable associations are identified among ground-level frontage roads, non-motorized vehicle lanes, elevated mainlines, and cross-section widths of 25~35 m. In addition, as traffic volume increases, the proportions of 8-lane and 10-lane schemes increase significantly. These findings provide a reference for the systematic compilation of expressway renewal cases and for preliminary scheme analysis.
文章引用:朱敏, 许璐瑶, 张财喜. 城市快速路横断面案例的聚类识别与关联规则挖掘研究[J]. 数据挖掘, 2027, 17(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjdm.2027.171001

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. CJJ 129-2009城市快速路设计规程[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009.
[2] 吴作军, 王麒翔. 城市快速路建设形式研究——以成都市武侯大道(二环路-绕城高速)快速化改造为例[J]. 城市道桥与防洪, 2021(7): 20-24+9.
[3] Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T. and Swami, A. (1993) Mining Association Rules between Sets of Items in Large Databases. ACM SIGMOD Record, 22, 207-216.
https://doi.org/10.1145/170036.170072
[4] Huang, Z. (1998) Extensions to the K-Means Algorithm for Clustering Large Data Sets with Categorical Values. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2, 283-304.
https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009769707641
[5] Kaufman, L. and Rousseeuw, P.J. (1990) Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801
[6] Zhu, M., Zhou, W., Hu, M., Du, J. and Yuan, T. (2023) Evaluating the Renewal Degree for Expressway Regeneration Projects Based on a Model Integrating the Fuzzy Delphi Method, the Fuzzy AHP Method, and the TOPSIS Method. Sustainability, 15, Article 3769.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043769
[7] Zhu, M., Zhou, W. and Yuan, T. (2023) Urban Expressway Renewal Strategy Based on Knowledge Graphs. Applied Sciences, 13, Article 4666.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084666
[8] Pan, X., Xu, M., Jia, J., Xia, Y. and Chen, Q. (2022) Evaluation Model of Highway Reconstruction and Expansion Scheme Based on Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, Article ID: 3764557.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3764557
[9] Hu, X., Xia, B., Skitmore, M. and Chen, Q. (2016) The Application of Case-Based Reasoning in Construction Management Research: An Overview. Automation in Construction, 72, 65-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.023
[10] Farghaly, K., Soman, R.K. and Zhou, S.A. (2023) The Evolution of Ontology in AEC: A Two-Decade Synthesis, Application Domains, and Future Directions. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 36, Article 100519.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2023.100519